后社会主义东欧的阶级文化

IF 1 Q1 Arts and Humanities
Ana Birešev
{"title":"后社会主义东欧的阶级文化","authors":"Ana Birešev","doi":"10.1515/soeu-2020-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tation taken from a newspaper article— Cercel analyzes public discourses on this ‘invasion’ of the deserted German villages by ‘gypsies’. Instead of debating rational public policies and launching media campaigns to cope with the emigration of the Germans, the ethnic Romanian elites resorted to blaming other minorities, such as the most vulnerable one, the Roma, and sometimes even the Hungarians. Thus, in reality, their professed ‘philo-Germanism without Germans’ reveals their rejection of Romania’s other national minorities and thus, of the ‘other Others’. The volume informs the readers about the German–Romanian relationship in the turbulent postsocialist years. The richness of detail and their careful contextualization helps readers to form an accurate image of these relationships. That said, with regard to the theoretical framework, the shortcomings I have noted above diminish the quality of the book and leave scholars specializing in this field with a sense of inconsistency.","PeriodicalId":51954,"journal":{"name":"Sudosteuropa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/soeu-2020-0008","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Class Cultures in Postsocialist Eastern Europe\",\"authors\":\"Ana Birešev\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/soeu-2020-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"tation taken from a newspaper article— Cercel analyzes public discourses on this ‘invasion’ of the deserted German villages by ‘gypsies’. Instead of debating rational public policies and launching media campaigns to cope with the emigration of the Germans, the ethnic Romanian elites resorted to blaming other minorities, such as the most vulnerable one, the Roma, and sometimes even the Hungarians. Thus, in reality, their professed ‘philo-Germanism without Germans’ reveals their rejection of Romania’s other national minorities and thus, of the ‘other Others’. The volume informs the readers about the German–Romanian relationship in the turbulent postsocialist years. The richness of detail and their careful contextualization helps readers to form an accurate image of these relationships. That said, with regard to the theoretical framework, the shortcomings I have noted above diminish the quality of the book and leave scholars specializing in this field with a sense of inconsistency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sudosteuropa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/soeu-2020-0008\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sudosteuropa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2020-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudosteuropa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2020-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘自报纸上的一篇文章——Cercel分析了关于“吉普赛人”“入侵”被遗弃的德国村庄的公共话语。罗马尼亚少数民族的精英们没有就合理的公共政策进行辩论,也没有发起媒体运动来应对德国人的移民,而是转而指责其他少数民族,比如最脆弱的罗姆人,有时甚至是匈牙利人。因此,实际上,他们所宣称的“没有德国人的爱日耳曼主义”表明他们拒绝罗马尼亚的其他少数民族,因此也拒绝“其他他者”。该卷告知读者在动荡的后社会主义岁月德国罗马尼亚的关系。丰富的细节和精心的语境化有助于读者对这些关系形成准确的印象。也就是说,就理论框架而言,我上面提到的缺点降低了本书的质量,并使专门研究这一领域的学者感到不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Class Cultures in Postsocialist Eastern Europe
tation taken from a newspaper article— Cercel analyzes public discourses on this ‘invasion’ of the deserted German villages by ‘gypsies’. Instead of debating rational public policies and launching media campaigns to cope with the emigration of the Germans, the ethnic Romanian elites resorted to blaming other minorities, such as the most vulnerable one, the Roma, and sometimes even the Hungarians. Thus, in reality, their professed ‘philo-Germanism without Germans’ reveals their rejection of Romania’s other national minorities and thus, of the ‘other Others’. The volume informs the readers about the German–Romanian relationship in the turbulent postsocialist years. The richness of detail and their careful contextualization helps readers to form an accurate image of these relationships. That said, with regard to the theoretical framework, the shortcomings I have noted above diminish the quality of the book and leave scholars specializing in this field with a sense of inconsistency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sudosteuropa
Sudosteuropa AREA STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信