联邦政府对语音合成技术发展的支持:以库兹韦尔阅读机为例

IF 0.6 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY
S. Bell
{"title":"联邦政府对语音合成技术发展的支持:以库兹韦尔阅读机为例","authors":"S. Bell","doi":"10.7560/ic58103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This case study situates an early text-to-speech computer developed for blind persons, the Kurzweil Reading Machine (KRM), within a broader history of speech synthesis technologies. Though typically no more than a footnote in the technical history of speech synthesis, the KRM was still a powerful symbol of innovation that reveals how disability can be used as a pretext for funding technology development. I argue that various boosters held the KRM up as a symbol of technological solutionism that promised to fully enroll blind people into the US political economy. However, the success of the KRM as a symbol belies its technical flaws, the federal subsidies needed to bring it to fruition, and the structural barriers to its use that were elided by its utopian promise.","PeriodicalId":42337,"journal":{"name":"Information & Culture","volume":"58 1","pages":"39 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federal Support for the Development of Speech Synthesis Technologies: A Case Study of the Kurzweil Reading Machine\",\"authors\":\"S. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.7560/ic58103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This case study situates an early text-to-speech computer developed for blind persons, the Kurzweil Reading Machine (KRM), within a broader history of speech synthesis technologies. Though typically no more than a footnote in the technical history of speech synthesis, the KRM was still a powerful symbol of innovation that reveals how disability can be used as a pretext for funding technology development. I argue that various boosters held the KRM up as a symbol of technological solutionism that promised to fully enroll blind people into the US political economy. However, the success of the KRM as a symbol belies its technical flaws, the federal subsidies needed to bring it to fruition, and the structural barriers to its use that were elided by its utopian promise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information & Culture\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information & Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7560/ic58103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/ic58103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例研究将早期为盲人开发的文本转语音计算机库兹韦尔阅读机(Kurzweil Reading Machine, KRM)置于更广泛的语音合成技术历史中。虽然KRM在语音合成技术史上通常不过是一个注脚,但它仍然是一个强有力的创新象征,它揭示了残疾如何被用作资助技术开发的借口。我认为,各种支持者将KRM视为技术解决方案主义的象征,承诺将盲人完全纳入美国政治经济。然而,KRM作为一个象征的成功掩盖了它的技术缺陷,实现它所需的联邦补贴,以及使用它的结构性障碍,而这些障碍被它的乌托邦承诺所忽略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Federal Support for the Development of Speech Synthesis Technologies: A Case Study of the Kurzweil Reading Machine
abstract:This case study situates an early text-to-speech computer developed for blind persons, the Kurzweil Reading Machine (KRM), within a broader history of speech synthesis technologies. Though typically no more than a footnote in the technical history of speech synthesis, the KRM was still a powerful symbol of innovation that reveals how disability can be used as a pretext for funding technology development. I argue that various boosters held the KRM up as a symbol of technological solutionism that promised to fully enroll blind people into the US political economy. However, the success of the KRM as a symbol belies its technical flaws, the federal subsidies needed to bring it to fruition, and the structural barriers to its use that were elided by its utopian promise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信