错失的机会与社会科学的局限性:托马斯·皮凯蒂《资本与意识形态》述评[i]

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
G. Meisenberg
{"title":"错失的机会与社会科学的局限性:托马斯·皮凯蒂《资本与意识形态》述评[i]","authors":"G. Meisenberg","doi":"10.46469/mq.2020.61.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Piketty’s new book is a sequel to his 2014 bestseller The Capital in the 21st Century. Like the earlier book, Capital and Ideology offers descriptions of historical developments that are sound, relevant and enlightening, and most of his policy proposals are commendable. Piketty recognizes that ideology is causally effective rather than mere superstructure, and that it has driven in large part the political and economic developments that he describes. However, he has his blind spots. His neglect of psychology and biology leaves his treatment of ideology shallow and unenlightening. Although he advocates for inequality-reducing policies, he presents no coherent rationale to justify such an endeavor; nor does he consider the individual differences in ability and personality that every effort at reducing inequality has to face. Piketty’s book provides a wealth of useful information, but it is also a prominent example for the inability of mainstream economics and social science to explain existing inequalities and to guide policies aimed at minimizing them.","PeriodicalId":45285,"journal":{"name":"MUSICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"61 1","pages":"136-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Missed Opportunities and the Limitations of Social Science: A Review of Thomas Piketty’s [i]Capital and Ideology[/i]\",\"authors\":\"G. Meisenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.46469/mq.2020.61.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Piketty’s new book is a sequel to his 2014 bestseller The Capital in the 21st Century. Like the earlier book, Capital and Ideology offers descriptions of historical developments that are sound, relevant and enlightening, and most of his policy proposals are commendable. Piketty recognizes that ideology is causally effective rather than mere superstructure, and that it has driven in large part the political and economic developments that he describes. However, he has his blind spots. His neglect of psychology and biology leaves his treatment of ideology shallow and unenlightening. Although he advocates for inequality-reducing policies, he presents no coherent rationale to justify such an endeavor; nor does he consider the individual differences in ability and personality that every effort at reducing inequality has to face. Piketty’s book provides a wealth of useful information, but it is also a prominent example for the inability of mainstream economics and social science to explain existing inequalities and to guide policies aimed at minimizing them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUSICAL QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"136-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUSICAL QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46469/mq.2020.61.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46469/mq.2020.61.1.12","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

皮凯蒂的新书是他2014年畅销书《21世纪的资本》的续集。与前一本书一样,《资本论与意识形态》对历史发展的描述是合理的、相关的、有启发性的,他的大多数政策建议都是值得称赞的。皮凯蒂认识到,意识形态具有因果效应,而不仅仅是上层建筑,它在很大程度上推动了他所描述的政治和经济发展。然而,他也有自己的盲点。他对心理学和生物学的忽视使得他对意识形态的处理肤浅而没有启发性。虽然他提倡减少不平等的政策,但他没有提出合理的理由来证明这种努力;他也没有考虑到每一项减少不平等的努力都必须面对的个人能力和个性差异。皮凯蒂的书提供了大量有用的信息,但它也是一个突出的例子,说明主流经济学和社会科学无法解释现有的不平等现象,也无法指导旨在将其最小化的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Missed Opportunities and the Limitations of Social Science: A Review of Thomas Piketty’s [i]Capital and Ideology[/i]
Piketty’s new book is a sequel to his 2014 bestseller The Capital in the 21st Century. Like the earlier book, Capital and Ideology offers descriptions of historical developments that are sound, relevant and enlightening, and most of his policy proposals are commendable. Piketty recognizes that ideology is causally effective rather than mere superstructure, and that it has driven in large part the political and economic developments that he describes. However, he has his blind spots. His neglect of psychology and biology leaves his treatment of ideology shallow and unenlightening. Although he advocates for inequality-reducing policies, he presents no coherent rationale to justify such an endeavor; nor does he consider the individual differences in ability and personality that every effort at reducing inequality has to face. Piketty’s book provides a wealth of useful information, but it is also a prominent example for the inability of mainstream economics and social science to explain existing inequalities and to guide policies aimed at minimizing them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Musical Quarterly, founded in 1915 by Oscar Sonneck, has long been cited as the premier scholarly musical journal in the United States. Over the years it has published the writings of many important composers and musicologists, including Aaron Copland, Arnold Schoenberg, Marc Blitzstein, Henry Cowell, and Camille Saint-Saens. The journal focuses on the merging areas in scholarship where much of the challenging new work in the study of music is being produced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信