反应率材料引导探究学习模型对批判性思维能力的分析

R. Ningtiyas, H. Nasrudin
{"title":"反应率材料引导探究学习模型对批判性思维能力的分析","authors":"R. Ningtiyas, H. Nasrudin","doi":"10.17977/um048v27i2p64-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to analyze students' Critical Thinking Skills on the Reaction Rate materials through the Guided Inquiry Learning Model. This study was conducted in SMAN 1 Taman using a one-group pretest-posttest design. The data obtained were analyzed using the percentage, mean, n-gain, and t-test techniques. The research result shows that (1) The average percentage implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Model syntax executed in phases 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 in a row is 94.17 percent; 98.61 percen; 100 percent; 98.96 percen; 100 percen; and 100 percen, with excellent criteria, (2) the percentage of students' activities who are actively involved and relevant to Guided Inquiry Learning Model is 94.45 percent at a meeting I and 97.78 percent at meeting II, (3) students' Critical Thinking Skills are complete in all components tested, namely interpretation, inference, analysis, and explanation with an average gained score of 0.82; 0.84; 0.77; and 0.91, and (4) there is a significant difference in the results of Critical Thinking Skills between before and after being given a Guided Inquiry Learning Model. The results showed that the Guided Inquiry Learning Model is effective in improving students' Critical Thinking Skills","PeriodicalId":30895,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Through Guided Inquiry Learning Model on Reaction Rate Materials\",\"authors\":\"R. Ningtiyas, H. Nasrudin\",\"doi\":\"10.17977/um048v27i2p64-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to analyze students' Critical Thinking Skills on the Reaction Rate materials through the Guided Inquiry Learning Model. This study was conducted in SMAN 1 Taman using a one-group pretest-posttest design. The data obtained were analyzed using the percentage, mean, n-gain, and t-test techniques. The research result shows that (1) The average percentage implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Model syntax executed in phases 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 in a row is 94.17 percent; 98.61 percen; 100 percent; 98.96 percen; 100 percen; and 100 percen, with excellent criteria, (2) the percentage of students' activities who are actively involved and relevant to Guided Inquiry Learning Model is 94.45 percent at a meeting I and 97.78 percent at meeting II, (3) students' Critical Thinking Skills are complete in all components tested, namely interpretation, inference, analysis, and explanation with an average gained score of 0.82; 0.84; 0.77; and 0.91, and (4) there is a significant difference in the results of Critical Thinking Skills between before and after being given a Guided Inquiry Learning Model. The results showed that the Guided Inquiry Learning Model is effective in improving students' Critical Thinking Skills\",\"PeriodicalId\":30895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v27i2p64-72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v27i2p64-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过引导式探究学习模式分析学生对反应率材料的批判性思维技能。本研究采用一组前测后测设计,在SMAN1-Taman进行。使用百分比、平均值、n增益和t检验技术对获得的数据进行分析。研究结果表明:(1)引导探究学习模型语法在1、2、3、4、5和6阶段连续执行的平均执行率为94.17%;98.61%;100%;98.96%;100%;和100 percen,具有优秀的标准,(2)学生积极参与并与引导探究学习模式相关的活动的百分比在第一次会议上为94.45%,在第二次会议上是97.78%;(3)学生的批判性思维技能在所有测试组成部分,即解释、推理、分析和解释方面都是完整的,平均得分为0.82;0.84;0.77;和0.91,以及(4)在给予引导探究学习模型之前和之后,批判性思维技能的结果存在显著差异。结果表明,引导式探究学习模式在提高学生批判性思维能力方面是有效的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Through Guided Inquiry Learning Model on Reaction Rate Materials
This study aimed to analyze students' Critical Thinking Skills on the Reaction Rate materials through the Guided Inquiry Learning Model. This study was conducted in SMAN 1 Taman using a one-group pretest-posttest design. The data obtained were analyzed using the percentage, mean, n-gain, and t-test techniques. The research result shows that (1) The average percentage implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Model syntax executed in phases 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 in a row is 94.17 percent; 98.61 percen; 100 percent; 98.96 percen; 100 percen; and 100 percen, with excellent criteria, (2) the percentage of students' activities who are actively involved and relevant to Guided Inquiry Learning Model is 94.45 percent at a meeting I and 97.78 percent at meeting II, (3) students' Critical Thinking Skills are complete in all components tested, namely interpretation, inference, analysis, and explanation with an average gained score of 0.82; 0.84; 0.77; and 0.91, and (4) there is a significant difference in the results of Critical Thinking Skills between before and after being given a Guided Inquiry Learning Model. The results showed that the Guided Inquiry Learning Model is effective in improving students' Critical Thinking Skills
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信