多于各部分的总和：理解计划网络的方法

IF 2.8 3区经济学 Q2 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Journal of Planning Education and Research Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI:10.1177/0739456x221096395

Sierra Woodruff, Sara Meerow, Bryce Hannibal, Melina Matos, Malini Roy, Philip Gilbertson

{"title":"多于各部分的总和：理解计划网络的方法","authors":"Sierra Woodruff, Sara Meerow, Bryce Hannibal, Melina Matos, Malini Roy, Philip Gilbertson","doi":"10.1177/0739456x221096395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Communities create a variety of plans that collectively shape future development patterns. Methodological approaches to analyze multiple plans and their relationships have been underdeveloped. We compare four complementary methodological approaches to study the relationships between plans: (1) cross-referencing, (2) plan quality evaluation, (3) plan integration for resilience scorecard, and (4) social network analysis. We apply each approach to Boston’s network of plans to understand how the city’s plans together address current and future flooding. We find relatively strong integration of plans in Boston. When combined, these four approaches provide a more comprehensive framework for understanding networks of plans.","PeriodicalId":16793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More than the Sum of Their Parts: Approaches to Understand a Network of Plans\",\"authors\":\"Sierra Woodruff, Sara Meerow, Bryce Hannibal, Melina Matos, Malini Roy, Philip Gilbertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0739456x221096395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Communities create a variety of plans that collectively shape future development patterns. Methodological approaches to analyze multiple plans and their relationships have been underdeveloped. We compare four complementary methodological approaches to study the relationships between plans: (1) cross-referencing, (2) plan quality evaluation, (3) plan integration for resilience scorecard, and (4) social network analysis. We apply each approach to Boston’s network of plans to understand how the city’s plans together address current and future flooding. We find relatively strong integration of plans in Boston. When combined, these four approaches provide a more comprehensive framework for understanding networks of plans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Planning Education and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Planning Education and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x221096395\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x221096395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

社区制定了各种计划，共同塑造了未来的发展模式。分析多个计划及其关系的方法论方法尚不成熟。我们比较了四种互补的方法来研究计划之间的关系：（1）交叉引用，（2）计划质量评估，（3）弹性记分卡的计划整合，以及（4）社会网络分析。我们将每种方法应用于波士顿的计划网络，以了解该市的计划如何共同应对当前和未来的洪水。我们发现波士顿的计划整合相对较强。这四种方法结合起来，为理解计划网络提供了一个更全面的框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

More than the Sum of Their Parts: Approaches to Understand a Network of Plans

Communities create a variety of plans that collectively shape future development patterns. Methodological approaches to analyze multiple plans and their relationships have been underdeveloped. We compare four complementary methodological approaches to study the relationships between plans: (1) cross-referencing, (2) plan quality evaluation, (3) plan integration for resilience scorecard, and (4) social network analysis. We apply each approach to Boston’s network of plans to understand how the city’s plans together address current and future flooding. We find relatively strong integration of plans in Boston. When combined, these four approaches provide a more comprehensive framework for understanding networks of plans.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Planning Education and Research Multiple-

CiteScore

7.40

自引率

4.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Planning Education and Research (JPER) is a forum for planning educators and scholars (from both academia and practice) to present results from teaching and research that advance the profession and improve planning practice. JPER is the official journal of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP) and the journal of record for North American planning scholarship. Aimed at scholars and educators in urban and regional planning, political science, policy analysis, urban geography, economics, and sociology, JPER presents the most vital contemporary trends and issues in planning theory, practice, and pedagogy.