介绍

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
M. Saito
{"title":"介绍","authors":"M. Saito","doi":"10.1515/tlr-2019-2038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japanese is full of syntactic phenomena that are not found in English and other European languages. The papers in this issue examine those phenomena in Minimalist perspective. The Minimalist Syntax as proposed in Chomsky (2013, 2015) consists of two basic components. One is the fundamental operation Merge, which takes two elements α, β and forms a constituent γ= {α, β}. It accompanies a labeling algorithm that specifies the nature of the formed object γ. For example, when α is verbal and β is nominal, the algorithm decides which property γ inherits. The other is Transfer, which sends the structures constructed by Merge to the interpretive components. The standard hypothesis is that Transfer does not take place all at once after a derivation is completed but applies throughout the derivation in units called phases. Merge and Transfer are indeed two operations that are minimally required of syntactic theory. One of the main goals of research in Minimalism is to eliminate stipulated syntactic principles. Thus, the distribution of DPs and the obligatory application of movement (Internal Merge) as well as its last resort property, for example, are argued to follow from the nature of Merge and the accompanying labeling algorithm. Transfer, on the other hand, is claimed to be responsible for the locality observed in movement as well as anaphor binding. (See, for example, Quicoli (2008) and Charnavel and Sportiche (2016) for attempts to derive Condition (A) effects from Transfer.) This makes the analysis of parametric variation among languages more challenging and poses new problems to be addressed in language acquisition. A unique property of a language or of a group of languages cannot be accounted for by a parameter attached to a stipulated principle. It must be derived from the universal mechanisms of Merge and Transfer. On the other hand, the Minimalist Program makes investigation into parametric variation more rewarding as well. An analysis of a unique property of a language in Minimalist perspective is automatically a proposal on the fundamentals of the general syntactic theory. The papers in this issue are all on Japanese but aim at this goal. They concern how Merge applies, how ellipsis takes place in a derivation, how movement chains are interpreted, what labels are for, and how the labeling mechanism is acquired by children.","PeriodicalId":46358,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Review","volume":"37 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tlr-2019-2038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction\",\"authors\":\"M. Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/tlr-2019-2038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Japanese is full of syntactic phenomena that are not found in English and other European languages. The papers in this issue examine those phenomena in Minimalist perspective. The Minimalist Syntax as proposed in Chomsky (2013, 2015) consists of two basic components. One is the fundamental operation Merge, which takes two elements α, β and forms a constituent γ= {α, β}. It accompanies a labeling algorithm that specifies the nature of the formed object γ. For example, when α is verbal and β is nominal, the algorithm decides which property γ inherits. The other is Transfer, which sends the structures constructed by Merge to the interpretive components. The standard hypothesis is that Transfer does not take place all at once after a derivation is completed but applies throughout the derivation in units called phases. Merge and Transfer are indeed two operations that are minimally required of syntactic theory. One of the main goals of research in Minimalism is to eliminate stipulated syntactic principles. Thus, the distribution of DPs and the obligatory application of movement (Internal Merge) as well as its last resort property, for example, are argued to follow from the nature of Merge and the accompanying labeling algorithm. Transfer, on the other hand, is claimed to be responsible for the locality observed in movement as well as anaphor binding. (See, for example, Quicoli (2008) and Charnavel and Sportiche (2016) for attempts to derive Condition (A) effects from Transfer.) This makes the analysis of parametric variation among languages more challenging and poses new problems to be addressed in language acquisition. A unique property of a language or of a group of languages cannot be accounted for by a parameter attached to a stipulated principle. It must be derived from the universal mechanisms of Merge and Transfer. On the other hand, the Minimalist Program makes investigation into parametric variation more rewarding as well. An analysis of a unique property of a language in Minimalist perspective is automatically a proposal on the fundamentals of the general syntactic theory. The papers in this issue are all on Japanese but aim at this goal. They concern how Merge applies, how ellipsis takes place in a derivation, how movement chains are interpreted, what labels are for, and how the labeling mechanism is acquired by children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Review\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tlr-2019-2038\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2038\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日语中充满了英语和其他欧洲语言所没有的句法现象。这期论文从极简主义的角度来审视这些现象。乔姆斯基(2013,2015)提出的极简语法由两个基本组成部分组成。一种是基本的合并操作,它采用两个元素α, β并形成一个组成γ= {α, β}。它伴随着一个标记算法,该算法指定了形成的对象γ的性质。例如,当α是口头的,β是名义的,算法决定哪个属性γ继承。另一个是Transfer,它将Merge构造的结构发送给解释组件。标准假设是,在推导完成后,转移不会立即发生,而是以称为阶段的单位在整个推导过程中应用。合并和转移确实是语法理论中最低要求的两个操作。极简主义研究的主要目标之一是消除规定的句法原则。因此,dp的分布和运动的强制应用(内部合并)以及它的最后手段属性,例如,被认为是从合并的本质和伴随的标记算法中得出的。另一方面,迁移被认为是在运动中观察到的位置以及隐喻结合的原因。(例如,参见Quicoli(2008)和Charnavel and Sportiche(2016)试图从迁移中得出条件(A)效应。)这使得语言间参数变化的分析更具挑战性,并提出了语言习得中需要解决的新问题。一种语言或一组语言的独特属性不能用附加在规定原则上的参数来解释。它必须来自合并和转移的通用机制。另一方面,极简程序也使对参数变化的研究更有意义。从极简主义的角度分析一种语言的独特属性,自然是对一般句法理论基础的提出。这期的文章都是关于日语的,但都是为了这个目的。它们涉及如何应用Merge,在派生中如何发生省略号,如何解释运动链,标签的目的是什么,以及儿童如何获得标签机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction
Japanese is full of syntactic phenomena that are not found in English and other European languages. The papers in this issue examine those phenomena in Minimalist perspective. The Minimalist Syntax as proposed in Chomsky (2013, 2015) consists of two basic components. One is the fundamental operation Merge, which takes two elements α, β and forms a constituent γ= {α, β}. It accompanies a labeling algorithm that specifies the nature of the formed object γ. For example, when α is verbal and β is nominal, the algorithm decides which property γ inherits. The other is Transfer, which sends the structures constructed by Merge to the interpretive components. The standard hypothesis is that Transfer does not take place all at once after a derivation is completed but applies throughout the derivation in units called phases. Merge and Transfer are indeed two operations that are minimally required of syntactic theory. One of the main goals of research in Minimalism is to eliminate stipulated syntactic principles. Thus, the distribution of DPs and the obligatory application of movement (Internal Merge) as well as its last resort property, for example, are argued to follow from the nature of Merge and the accompanying labeling algorithm. Transfer, on the other hand, is claimed to be responsible for the locality observed in movement as well as anaphor binding. (See, for example, Quicoli (2008) and Charnavel and Sportiche (2016) for attempts to derive Condition (A) effects from Transfer.) This makes the analysis of parametric variation among languages more challenging and poses new problems to be addressed in language acquisition. A unique property of a language or of a group of languages cannot be accounted for by a parameter attached to a stipulated principle. It must be derived from the universal mechanisms of Merge and Transfer. On the other hand, the Minimalist Program makes investigation into parametric variation more rewarding as well. An analysis of a unique property of a language in Minimalist perspective is automatically a proposal on the fundamentals of the general syntactic theory. The papers in this issue are all on Japanese but aim at this goal. They concern how Merge applies, how ellipsis takes place in a derivation, how movement chains are interpreted, what labels are for, and how the labeling mechanism is acquired by children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Review
Linguistic Review Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Linguistic Review aims at publishing high-quality papers in syntax, semantics, phonology, and morphology, within a framework of Generative Grammar and related disciplines, as well as critical discussions of theoretical linguistics as a branch of cognitive psychology. Striving to be a platform for discussion, The Linguistic Review welcomes reviews of important new monographs in these areas, dissertation abstracts, and letters to the editor. The editor also welcomes initiatives for thematic issues with guest editors. The Linguistic Review is a peer-reviewed journal of international scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信