教育研究中使用表格和矩阵系统进行定性数据分析

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Elena Hernández de la Torre, Sandra González-Miguel
{"title":"教育研究中使用表格和矩阵系统进行定性数据分析","authors":"Elena Hernández de la Torre, Sandra González-Miguel","doi":"10.6018/REIFOP.435021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to provide qualitative analysis systems of the data generated from the information obtained in interviews of focus groups and discussion groups as a method of shared and conversational learning. Interviews have been carried out with two groups of experts in education, on the one hand focus groups formed by 4/5 teachers-consultants of teaching centers; on the other hand discussion groups formed by 4/6 teacher-mentors. A group of each group strategy has been used for the qualitative analysis of the data, the topics being used in the focus groups “Advantages and disadvantages of the participation of schools in school networks” and in the discussion groups “Identification of obstacles and barriers in the process of advising beginner teachers”. In both cases, the conversation about their own professional experiences has been deepened, being analyzed with systems of tables and matrices of which we propose two models. It concludes the need to use rigorous models of systematic analysis of the information obtained with the objective of building solid theories by the interviewees on the topics to be treated in shared experiences for the construction of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":36972,"journal":{"name":"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado","volume":"23 1","pages":"115-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis de datos cualitativos a través del sistema de tablas y matrices en investigación educativa\",\"authors\":\"Elena Hernández de la Torre, Sandra González-Miguel\",\"doi\":\"10.6018/REIFOP.435021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to provide qualitative analysis systems of the data generated from the information obtained in interviews of focus groups and discussion groups as a method of shared and conversational learning. Interviews have been carried out with two groups of experts in education, on the one hand focus groups formed by 4/5 teachers-consultants of teaching centers; on the other hand discussion groups formed by 4/6 teacher-mentors. A group of each group strategy has been used for the qualitative analysis of the data, the topics being used in the focus groups “Advantages and disadvantages of the participation of schools in school networks” and in the discussion groups “Identification of obstacles and barriers in the process of advising beginner teachers”. In both cases, the conversation about their own professional experiences has been deepened, being analyzed with systems of tables and matrices of which we propose two models. It concludes the need to use rigorous models of systematic analysis of the information obtained with the objective of building solid theories by the interviewees on the topics to be treated in shared experiences for the construction of knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"115-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6018/REIFOP.435021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6018/REIFOP.435021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在提供从焦点小组和讨论小组访谈中获得的信息中产生的数据的定性分析系统,作为共享和对话学习的方法。对两组教育专家进行了访谈,一组是由4/5名教学中心教师顾问组成的焦点小组;另一方面,由4/6名教师组成的讨论小组。每个小组的一组策略被用于数据的定性分析,主题被用于焦点小组“学校参与学校网络的优点和缺点”和讨论小组“在向初级教师提供建议的过程中确定障碍和障碍”。在这两种情况下,关于他们自己的专业经验的对话已经加深,用表格和矩阵系统进行分析,我们提出了两个模型。它的结论是,需要使用严格的模型对获得的信息进行系统分析,目的是让受访者对要在共享经验中处理的主题建立坚实的理论,以构建知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Análisis de datos cualitativos a través del sistema de tablas y matrices en investigación educativa
This article aims to provide qualitative analysis systems of the data generated from the information obtained in interviews of focus groups and discussion groups as a method of shared and conversational learning. Interviews have been carried out with two groups of experts in education, on the one hand focus groups formed by 4/5 teachers-consultants of teaching centers; on the other hand discussion groups formed by 4/6 teacher-mentors. A group of each group strategy has been used for the qualitative analysis of the data, the topics being used in the focus groups “Advantages and disadvantages of the participation of schools in school networks” and in the discussion groups “Identification of obstacles and barriers in the process of advising beginner teachers”. In both cases, the conversation about their own professional experiences has been deepened, being analyzed with systems of tables and matrices of which we propose two models. It concludes the need to use rigorous models of systematic analysis of the information obtained with the objective of building solid theories by the interviewees on the topics to be treated in shared experiences for the construction of knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信