润滑物质对根管粘结强度的影响

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry
César Blaas Knabach, Victório Poletto-Neto, Rafael Sarkis-Onofre, Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci, Tatiana Pereira-Cenci, Rogério de Castilho Jacinto
{"title":"润滑物质对根管粘结强度的影响","authors":"César Blaas Knabach,&nbsp;Victório Poletto-Neto,&nbsp;Rafael Sarkis-Onofre,&nbsp;Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci,&nbsp;Tatiana Pereira-Cenci,&nbsp;Rogério de Castilho Jacinto","doi":"10.1186/s40563-016-0074-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was evaluate the influence of the substance used as root canal lubricant during relining and the cleaning protocol on the bond strength of relined posts to root dentin. Eighty single canal mandibular bovine incisors were used in the study. The root canals were endodontically treated and allocated into four groups (n?=?20) according to the lubricant material and the root canal cleaning protocol: petroleum jelly/no cleaning; petroleum jelly/cleaning with paper points; hydrosoluble gel/no cleaning; hydrosoluble gel/water rinse and drying with paper points. All posts were relined with resin composite and luted to the root canals with regular resin cement. Specimens were cross-sectioned to obtain root slices producing 1.5?mm thick slices. The push-out test was performed at a crosshead speed of 0.5?mm/min until post dislodgement occurred. The failure mode was verified using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test (push-out) with α?=?0.05. A statistically significant difference was found considering the type of lubricant (p?&lt;?0.001). The hydrosoluble gel/water rinse group showed the highest mean bond strength value (11.0?±?3.7?MPa). The most frequent pattern of failure was adhesive between the root canal walls and resin cement. The use of a hydrosoluble gel as lubricant substance seems to be adequate for the relining post technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2016-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0074-4","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of lubricant substances on the bond strength of relined posts to root canals\",\"authors\":\"César Blaas Knabach,&nbsp;Victório Poletto-Neto,&nbsp;Rafael Sarkis-Onofre,&nbsp;Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci,&nbsp;Tatiana Pereira-Cenci,&nbsp;Rogério de Castilho Jacinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40563-016-0074-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study was evaluate the influence of the substance used as root canal lubricant during relining and the cleaning protocol on the bond strength of relined posts to root dentin. Eighty single canal mandibular bovine incisors were used in the study. The root canals were endodontically treated and allocated into four groups (n?=?20) according to the lubricant material and the root canal cleaning protocol: petroleum jelly/no cleaning; petroleum jelly/cleaning with paper points; hydrosoluble gel/no cleaning; hydrosoluble gel/water rinse and drying with paper points. All posts were relined with resin composite and luted to the root canals with regular resin cement. Specimens were cross-sectioned to obtain root slices producing 1.5?mm thick slices. The push-out test was performed at a crosshead speed of 0.5?mm/min until post dislodgement occurred. The failure mode was verified using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test (push-out) with α?=?0.05. A statistically significant difference was found considering the type of lubricant (p?&lt;?0.001). The hydrosoluble gel/water rinse group showed the highest mean bond strength value (11.0?±?3.7?MPa). The most frequent pattern of failure was adhesive between the root canal walls and resin cement. The use of a hydrosoluble gel as lubricant substance seems to be adequate for the relining post technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6800,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-016-0074-4\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0074-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-016-0074-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在补线过程中用作根管润滑剂的物质和清洁方案对补线桩与根本质结合强度的影响。本研究使用80个单管牛下颌门牙。根管进行根管治疗,根据润滑材料和根管清洁方案分为4组(n = 20):凡士林/不清洁;凡士林/清洁用纸点;水溶性凝胶/无需清洗;水溶性凝胶/水冲洗和干燥用纸点。所有桩均以树脂复合材料作衬里,并用常规树脂胶泥固定在根管上。对标本进行横切,得到产1.5?毫米厚的切片。推出试验以十字头速度0.5?Mm /min,直到发生后位移。用体视显微镜验证了失效模式。数据采用双因素方差分析,并采用Tukey事后检验(push-out), α = 0.05。考虑到润滑剂的类型,发现有统计学上显著的差异(p <?0.001)。水溶性凝胶/水冲洗组的平均结合强度值最高(11.0±3.7 MPa)。最常见的失败类型是根管壁与树脂水泥之间的粘连。使用一种水溶性凝胶作为润滑物质似乎是足够的衬桩技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of lubricant substances on the bond strength of relined posts to root canals

Effect of lubricant substances on the bond strength of relined posts to root canals

The aim of this study was evaluate the influence of the substance used as root canal lubricant during relining and the cleaning protocol on the bond strength of relined posts to root dentin. Eighty single canal mandibular bovine incisors were used in the study. The root canals were endodontically treated and allocated into four groups (n?=?20) according to the lubricant material and the root canal cleaning protocol: petroleum jelly/no cleaning; petroleum jelly/cleaning with paper points; hydrosoluble gel/no cleaning; hydrosoluble gel/water rinse and drying with paper points. All posts were relined with resin composite and luted to the root canals with regular resin cement. Specimens were cross-sectioned to obtain root slices producing 1.5?mm thick slices. The push-out test was performed at a crosshead speed of 0.5?mm/min until post dislodgement occurred. The failure mode was verified using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test (push-out) with α?=?0.05. A statistically significant difference was found considering the type of lubricant (p?<?0.001). The hydrosoluble gel/water rinse group showed the highest mean bond strength value (11.0?±?3.7?MPa). The most frequent pattern of failure was adhesive between the root canal walls and resin cement. The use of a hydrosoluble gel as lubricant substance seems to be adequate for the relining post technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信