再访库兹涅茨:我们对结构转型与不平等之间的关系了解多少?

IF 1 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Çinar Baymul, K. Sen
{"title":"再访库兹涅茨:我们对结构转型与不平等之间的关系了解多少?","authors":"Çinar Baymul, K. Sen","doi":"10.1162/adev_a_00126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper revisits the Kuznets postulate that structural transformation will be associated with increasing inequality using comparable time series data for 32 developing and recently developed economies for the post-1950 period. We find that structural transformation in the majority of our economies has resulted in the movement of workers from agriculture to services, and not to manufacturing. Economies show different paths of structural transformation that cut across geographical regions, being either structurally underdeveloped, structurally developing, or structurally developed. We see clear differences in the structural transformation–inequality relationship depending on the stage of structural transformation that a particular economy is in, as well as across regions. We do not see a Kuznets-type relationship between manufacturing employment share and inequality when we take into account the different paths of industrialization that economies in our dataset have followed. On the other hand, inequality unambiguously increases with structural transformation if the movement of workers from agriculture is to services.","PeriodicalId":39852,"journal":{"name":"Asian Development Review","volume":"36 1","pages":"136-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/adev_a_00126","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kuznets Revisited: What Do We Know about the Relationship between Structural Transformation and Inequality?\",\"authors\":\"Çinar Baymul, K. Sen\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/adev_a_00126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper revisits the Kuznets postulate that structural transformation will be associated with increasing inequality using comparable time series data for 32 developing and recently developed economies for the post-1950 period. We find that structural transformation in the majority of our economies has resulted in the movement of workers from agriculture to services, and not to manufacturing. Economies show different paths of structural transformation that cut across geographical regions, being either structurally underdeveloped, structurally developing, or structurally developed. We see clear differences in the structural transformation–inequality relationship depending on the stage of structural transformation that a particular economy is in, as well as across regions. We do not see a Kuznets-type relationship between manufacturing employment share and inequality when we take into account the different paths of industrialization that economies in our dataset have followed. On the other hand, inequality unambiguously increases with structural transformation if the movement of workers from agriculture is to services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Development Review\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"136-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/adev_a_00126\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Development Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/adev_a_00126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/adev_a_00126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文使用1950年后32个发展中经济体和最近发达经济体的可比时间序列数据,重新审视了库兹涅茨假设,即结构转型将与不平等加剧有关。我们发现,我们大多数经济体的结构转型导致了工人从农业转向服务业,而不是制造业。经济体呈现出跨越地理区域的不同结构转型路径,要么是结构欠发达,要么是结构性发展,要么是结构化发达。我们看到,结构转型-不平等关系存在明显差异,这取决于特定经济体所处的结构转型阶段,也取决于不同地区。当我们考虑到数据集中经济体所走的不同工业化道路时,我们没有看到制造业就业份额和不平等之间存在库兹涅茨式的关系。另一方面,如果工人从农业转向服务业,那么不平等无疑会随着结构转型而加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kuznets Revisited: What Do We Know about the Relationship between Structural Transformation and Inequality?
This paper revisits the Kuznets postulate that structural transformation will be associated with increasing inequality using comparable time series data for 32 developing and recently developed economies for the post-1950 period. We find that structural transformation in the majority of our economies has resulted in the movement of workers from agriculture to services, and not to manufacturing. Economies show different paths of structural transformation that cut across geographical regions, being either structurally underdeveloped, structurally developing, or structurally developed. We see clear differences in the structural transformation–inequality relationship depending on the stage of structural transformation that a particular economy is in, as well as across regions. We do not see a Kuznets-type relationship between manufacturing employment share and inequality when we take into account the different paths of industrialization that economies in our dataset have followed. On the other hand, inequality unambiguously increases with structural transformation if the movement of workers from agriculture is to services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Development Review
Asian Development Review Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asian Development Review is a professional journal for disseminating the results of economic and development research carried out by staff and resource persons of the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The Review stresses policy and operational relevance of development issues rather than the technical aspects of economics and other social sciences. Articles are refereed and intended for readership among economists and social scientists in government, private sector, academia, and international organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信