罗马尼亚信息系统分析师和设计师工具箱的一些见解

Marin Fotache, Gabriela Mesnita, Florin Dumitriu, G. Olaru
{"title":"罗马尼亚信息系统分析师和设计师工具箱的一些见解","authors":"Marin Fotache, Gabriela Mesnita, Florin Dumitriu, G. Olaru","doi":"10.1515/tjeb-2017-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Information Systems (IS) analysts and designers have been key members in software development teams. From waterfall to Rational Unified Process, from UML to agile development, IS modelers have faced many trends and buzzwords. Even if the topic of models and modeling tools in software development is important, there are no many detailed studies to identify for what the developers, customers and managers decide to use the modeling and specific tools. Despite the popularity of the subject, studies showing what tools the IS modelers prefer are scarce, and quasi-non-existent, when talking about Romanian market. As Romania is an important IT outsourcing market, this paper investigated what methods and tools Romanian IS analysts and designers apply. In this context, the starting question of our research focuses on the preference of the developers to choose between agile or non-agile methods in IT projects. As a result, the research questions targeted the main drivers in choosing specific methods and tools for IT projects deployed in Romanian companies. Also, one of the main objectives of this paper was to approach the relationship between the methodologies (agile or non-agile), diagrams and other tools (we refer in our study to the CASE features) with other variables/metrics of the system/software development project. The observational study was conducted based on a survey filled by IS modelers in Romanian IT companies. The data collected were processed and analyzed using Exploratory Data Analysis. The platform for data visualization and analysis was R.","PeriodicalId":30596,"journal":{"name":"Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business","volume":"10 1","pages":"1 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Few Insights Into Romanian Information Systems Analysts and Designers Toolbox\",\"authors\":\"Marin Fotache, Gabriela Mesnita, Florin Dumitriu, G. Olaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/tjeb-2017-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Information Systems (IS) analysts and designers have been key members in software development teams. From waterfall to Rational Unified Process, from UML to agile development, IS modelers have faced many trends and buzzwords. Even if the topic of models and modeling tools in software development is important, there are no many detailed studies to identify for what the developers, customers and managers decide to use the modeling and specific tools. Despite the popularity of the subject, studies showing what tools the IS modelers prefer are scarce, and quasi-non-existent, when talking about Romanian market. As Romania is an important IT outsourcing market, this paper investigated what methods and tools Romanian IS analysts and designers apply. In this context, the starting question of our research focuses on the preference of the developers to choose between agile or non-agile methods in IT projects. As a result, the research questions targeted the main drivers in choosing specific methods and tools for IT projects deployed in Romanian companies. Also, one of the main objectives of this paper was to approach the relationship between the methodologies (agile or non-agile), diagrams and other tools (we refer in our study to the CASE features) with other variables/metrics of the system/software development project. The observational study was conducted based on a survey filled by IS modelers in Romanian IT companies. The data collected were processed and analyzed using Exploratory Data Analysis. The platform for data visualization and analysis was R.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/tjeb-2017-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tjeb-2017-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信息系统(IS)分析师和设计师一直是软件开发团队中的关键成员。从瀑布到Rational统一过程,从UML到敏捷开发,信息系统建模者面临着许多趋势和流行语。即使软件开发中模型和建模工具的主题很重要,也没有很多详细的研究来确定开发人员、客户和管理人员决定使用建模和特定工具的目的。尽管这个主题很受欢迎,但在谈论罗马尼亚市场时,显示IS建模者更喜欢什么工具的研究很少,而且几乎不存在。由于罗马尼亚是一个重要的信息技术外包市场,本文调查了罗马尼亚信息技术分析师和设计师使用的方法和工具。在这种情况下,我们研究的开始问题集中在开发人员在IT项目中选择敏捷方法还是非敏捷方法的偏好上。因此,研究问题针对罗马尼亚公司部署的IT项目选择特定方法和工具的主要驱动因素。此外,本文的主要目标之一是探讨方法(敏捷或非敏捷)、图和其他工具(我们在研究中提到了CASE特性)与系统/软件开发项目的其他变量/度量之间的关系。这项观察性研究是根据罗马尼亚IT公司的IS建模者填写的调查进行的。收集的数据使用探索性数据分析进行处理和分析。数据可视化和分析的平台是R。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Few Insights Into Romanian Information Systems Analysts and Designers Toolbox
Abstract Information Systems (IS) analysts and designers have been key members in software development teams. From waterfall to Rational Unified Process, from UML to agile development, IS modelers have faced many trends and buzzwords. Even if the topic of models and modeling tools in software development is important, there are no many detailed studies to identify for what the developers, customers and managers decide to use the modeling and specific tools. Despite the popularity of the subject, studies showing what tools the IS modelers prefer are scarce, and quasi-non-existent, when talking about Romanian market. As Romania is an important IT outsourcing market, this paper investigated what methods and tools Romanian IS analysts and designers apply. In this context, the starting question of our research focuses on the preference of the developers to choose between agile or non-agile methods in IT projects. As a result, the research questions targeted the main drivers in choosing specific methods and tools for IT projects deployed in Romanian companies. Also, one of the main objectives of this paper was to approach the relationship between the methodologies (agile or non-agile), diagrams and other tools (we refer in our study to the CASE features) with other variables/metrics of the system/software development project. The observational study was conducted based on a survey filled by IS modelers in Romanian IT companies. The data collected were processed and analyzed using Exploratory Data Analysis. The platform for data visualization and analysis was R.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信