法律与数字化:一些学术幻想与现实问题

I. Leksin
{"title":"法律与数字化:一些学术幻想与现实问题","authors":"I. Leksin","doi":"10.17516/1997-1370-0745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes two interrelated issues: the influence of digitalization upon the key phenomena that the legal theory deals with and the degree to which digitalization of actual processes reflects in the construction of the legislative provisions. The author examines the body of recent papers on these issues and the content of the Russian electoral and referendum legislation affected by the digitalization processes. He criticizes the unduly broad approach to understanding digitalization the Russian legal scholars tend to use and questions the applicability of the respective word to the most important legal phenomena. Above all, it comes necessary that the law can lend itself to digitization, while by no means it can be digitalized. Among the practical challenges the author emphasizes the need to rethink or redesign the structure of the usual legal relations exposed to the digital context. Vocabulary update and other superficial amendments to the existing legal provisions are quite an insufficient answer to this challenge. A careful and sophisticated revision of legislative construction is required in order to deal with the digitization issues, while currently the mentioned need often remains without due attention of the lawmakers.","PeriodicalId":37201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"602-610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law and Digitalization: Some Academic Illusions and Practical Issues\",\"authors\":\"I. Leksin\",\"doi\":\"10.17516/1997-1370-0745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes two interrelated issues: the influence of digitalization upon the key phenomena that the legal theory deals with and the degree to which digitalization of actual processes reflects in the construction of the legislative provisions. The author examines the body of recent papers on these issues and the content of the Russian electoral and referendum legislation affected by the digitalization processes. He criticizes the unduly broad approach to understanding digitalization the Russian legal scholars tend to use and questions the applicability of the respective word to the most important legal phenomena. Above all, it comes necessary that the law can lend itself to digitization, while by no means it can be digitalized. Among the practical challenges the author emphasizes the need to rethink or redesign the structure of the usual legal relations exposed to the digital context. Vocabulary update and other superficial amendments to the existing legal provisions are quite an insufficient answer to this challenge. A careful and sophisticated revision of legislative construction is required in order to deal with the digitization issues, while currently the mentioned need often remains without due attention of the lawmakers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"602-610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了两个相互关联的问题:数字化对法学理论处理的关键现象的影响以及实际过程的数字化在立法条款构建中的体现程度。作者研究了最近关于这些问题的论文,以及受数字化进程影响的俄罗斯选举和公民投票立法的内容。他批评了俄罗斯法律学者倾向于使用的过于宽泛的方法来理解数字化,并质疑了该词在最重要的法律现象中的适用性。最重要的是,法律必须能够数字化,而绝不能数字化。在实际挑战中,作者强调需要重新思考或重新设计暴露于数字背景下的通常法律关系的结构。词汇更新和对现有法律条款的其他肤浅修改是远远不足以应对这一挑战的。要应对数字化问题,需要对立法建设进行缜密细致的修改,而目前立法工作者往往对这一需求缺乏应有的重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Law and Digitalization: Some Academic Illusions and Practical Issues
The article analyzes two interrelated issues: the influence of digitalization upon the key phenomena that the legal theory deals with and the degree to which digitalization of actual processes reflects in the construction of the legislative provisions. The author examines the body of recent papers on these issues and the content of the Russian electoral and referendum legislation affected by the digitalization processes. He criticizes the unduly broad approach to understanding digitalization the Russian legal scholars tend to use and questions the applicability of the respective word to the most important legal phenomena. Above all, it comes necessary that the law can lend itself to digitization, while by no means it can be digitalized. Among the practical challenges the author emphasizes the need to rethink or redesign the structure of the usual legal relations exposed to the digital context. Vocabulary update and other superficial amendments to the existing legal provisions are quite an insufficient answer to this challenge. A careful and sophisticated revision of legislative construction is required in order to deal with the digitization issues, while currently the mentioned need often remains without due attention of the lawmakers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信