{"title":"朝鲜同胞是“朝鲜人”吗?李承晚时代韩国民族主义的三次分化(1948-60)","authors":"Bumsoo Kim","doi":"10.1215/21581665-7258094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Focusing on the question of whether South Koreans' notion of \"we, the people of Korea\" (uri taehan kungmin) included North Korean compatriots or not, this study examines the trifurcation of ethnic nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee era (1948–1960). Specifically, by analyzing columns and editorials of three Korean newspapers, Chosŏn ilbo, Tonga ilbo, and Kyŏnghyang sinmun, this study reveals that, following the division of Korea (1948), Korean nationalism trifurcated, at least in South Korea, into three different but closely related versions, each of which did not deny that historically all Koreans belonged to the same nation, but defined \"we, the people of Korea\" differently: (1) tanil minjok (one nation) nationalism, which included not only South Koreans but also North Korean compatriots in \"we, the people of Korea\"; (2) anticommunist nationalism, which included South Koreans and \"patriotic compatriots\" of North Korea in \"we, the people of Korea\" while excluding North Korean \"commies\"; and (3) Taehan Min'guk (the great ROK) nationalism, which identified only South Koreans as \"we, the people of Korea.\" In doing so, this study suggests that, as the division of Korea solidified after the Korean War, South Koreans began to \"imagine\" themselves as a different national community, separated from North Korean compatriots.","PeriodicalId":43322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"149 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are North Korean Compatriots \\\"Korean\\\"? The Trifurcation of Ethnic Nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee Era (1948–60)\",\"authors\":\"Bumsoo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/21581665-7258094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Focusing on the question of whether South Koreans' notion of \\\"we, the people of Korea\\\" (uri taehan kungmin) included North Korean compatriots or not, this study examines the trifurcation of ethnic nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee era (1948–1960). Specifically, by analyzing columns and editorials of three Korean newspapers, Chosŏn ilbo, Tonga ilbo, and Kyŏnghyang sinmun, this study reveals that, following the division of Korea (1948), Korean nationalism trifurcated, at least in South Korea, into three different but closely related versions, each of which did not deny that historically all Koreans belonged to the same nation, but defined \\\"we, the people of Korea\\\" differently: (1) tanil minjok (one nation) nationalism, which included not only South Koreans but also North Korean compatriots in \\\"we, the people of Korea\\\"; (2) anticommunist nationalism, which included South Koreans and \\\"patriotic compatriots\\\" of North Korea in \\\"we, the people of Korea\\\" while excluding North Korean \\\"commies\\\"; and (3) Taehan Min'guk (the great ROK) nationalism, which identified only South Koreans as \\\"we, the people of Korea.\\\" In doing so, this study suggests that, as the division of Korea solidified after the Korean War, South Koreans began to \\\"imagine\\\" themselves as a different national community, separated from North Korean compatriots.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/21581665-7258094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/21581665-7258094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are North Korean Compatriots "Korean"? The Trifurcation of Ethnic Nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee Era (1948–60)
Abstract:Focusing on the question of whether South Koreans' notion of "we, the people of Korea" (uri taehan kungmin) included North Korean compatriots or not, this study examines the trifurcation of ethnic nationalism in South Korea during the Syngman Rhee era (1948–1960). Specifically, by analyzing columns and editorials of three Korean newspapers, Chosŏn ilbo, Tonga ilbo, and Kyŏnghyang sinmun, this study reveals that, following the division of Korea (1948), Korean nationalism trifurcated, at least in South Korea, into three different but closely related versions, each of which did not deny that historically all Koreans belonged to the same nation, but defined "we, the people of Korea" differently: (1) tanil minjok (one nation) nationalism, which included not only South Koreans but also North Korean compatriots in "we, the people of Korea"; (2) anticommunist nationalism, which included South Koreans and "patriotic compatriots" of North Korea in "we, the people of Korea" while excluding North Korean "commies"; and (3) Taehan Min'guk (the great ROK) nationalism, which identified only South Koreans as "we, the people of Korea." In doing so, this study suggests that, as the division of Korea solidified after the Korean War, South Koreans began to "imagine" themselves as a different national community, separated from North Korean compatriots.