2015年最高法院关于简单的诉讼解决方案的条例,作为简单的、快速和成本的证明原则的工具

Shanti Riskawati
{"title":"2015年最高法院关于简单的诉讼解决方案的条例,作为简单的、快速和成本的证明原则的工具","authors":"Shanti Riskawati","doi":"10.25123/vej.2917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a need to conduct business transactions rapidly and in a quick perfunctory manner.  At the same time arose also the need to develop and implement a quick, simple and cost efficient business dispute settlement procedure.  In response to this need, the Indonesian Supreme Court issued regulation no. 2 of 2015 re. procedure for filing simple civil claims. The legal issue to be discussed here, using a juridical normative or dogmatic approach, is whether this regulation succeed in fulfilling its promise to provide for a quick, simple and cost efficient civil claim examination procedure? The answer to this question is sought, in addition to the method mentioned above, by comparing the procedure provided by the Supreme Court regulation with the existing model of civil claim court examination procedure.  By virtue of this comparison the strength and weakness of the Supreme Court dispute settlement model can be analyzed.","PeriodicalId":32446,"journal":{"name":"Veritas et Justitia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2015 TENTANG TATA CARA PENYELESAIAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PERWUJUDAN ASAS PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN\",\"authors\":\"Shanti Riskawati\",\"doi\":\"10.25123/vej.2917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a need to conduct business transactions rapidly and in a quick perfunctory manner.  At the same time arose also the need to develop and implement a quick, simple and cost efficient business dispute settlement procedure.  In response to this need, the Indonesian Supreme Court issued regulation no. 2 of 2015 re. procedure for filing simple civil claims. The legal issue to be discussed here, using a juridical normative or dogmatic approach, is whether this regulation succeed in fulfilling its promise to provide for a quick, simple and cost efficient civil claim examination procedure? The answer to this question is sought, in addition to the method mentioned above, by comparing the procedure provided by the Supreme Court regulation with the existing model of civil claim court examination procedure.  By virtue of this comparison the strength and weakness of the Supreme Court dispute settlement model can be analyzed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veritas et Justitia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veritas et Justitia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veritas et Justitia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

有必要以快速和敷衍的方式进行商业交易。与此同时,还需要制定和执行一种快速、简单和成本效益高的商业争端解决程序。针对这一需要,印度尼西亚最高法院颁布了第2号条例。2015年第2号关于简单民事索赔的程序。这里要讨论的法律问题是,采用司法规范或教条的方法,该条例是否成功履行其承诺,提供一个快速,简单和成本效益高的民事索赔审查程序?除了上述方法外,还可以通过比较最高法院规定的程序与现有的民事索赔法院审查程序模式来寻求这个问题的答案。通过这种比较,可以分析出最高法院纠纷解决模式的优劣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2015 TENTANG TATA CARA PENYELESAIAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PERWUJUDAN ASAS PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN
There is a need to conduct business transactions rapidly and in a quick perfunctory manner.  At the same time arose also the need to develop and implement a quick, simple and cost efficient business dispute settlement procedure.  In response to this need, the Indonesian Supreme Court issued regulation no. 2 of 2015 re. procedure for filing simple civil claims. The legal issue to be discussed here, using a juridical normative or dogmatic approach, is whether this regulation succeed in fulfilling its promise to provide for a quick, simple and cost efficient civil claim examination procedure? The answer to this question is sought, in addition to the method mentioned above, by comparing the procedure provided by the Supreme Court regulation with the existing model of civil claim court examination procedure.  By virtue of this comparison the strength and weakness of the Supreme Court dispute settlement model can be analyzed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信