运动员压力调节干预的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和多水平荟萃分析

IF 6.4 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-28 DOI:10.1080/1750984x.2021.1977974

Elizabeth M. Murdoch, Robin L. J. Lines, M. Crane, N. Ntoumanis, Carly J. Brade, E. Quested, Joanne Ayers, D. Gucciardi

{"title":"运动员压力调节干预的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和多水平荟萃分析","authors":"Elizabeth M. Murdoch, Robin L. J. Lines, M. Crane, N. Ntoumanis, Carly J. Brade, E. Quested, Joanne Ayers, D. Gucciardi","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2021.1977974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"s in order of significance from existing articles known to the team as relevant for inclusion based on the screening criteria, and continuously updates the learning algorithm every 50 abstracts screened based on what is deemed as in/eligible by the reviewer. Preliminary evidence supports the utility of Research Screener for semi-automating the screening process (Chai et al., 2021). Briefly, across nine systematic reviews and two scoping reviews, Research Screener delivered a 60-90% workload saving, and estimated a conservative threshold of the need to screen no more than 50% of articles to assure that 100% of eligible articles are identified. EM and RL discussed uncertainty regarding the screening decision for 16 papers with DG, who made the executive decision regarding their suitability for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Reasons for study exclusion were summarised as part of the search and included in the data extraction flow diagram (see Figure 1).","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of stress regulation interventions with athletes: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth M. Murdoch, Robin L. J. Lines, M. Crane, N. Ntoumanis, Carly J. Brade, E. Quested, Joanne Ayers, D. Gucciardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1750984x.2021.1977974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"s in order of significance from existing articles known to the team as relevant for inclusion based on the screening criteria, and continuously updates the learning algorithm every 50 abstracts screened based on what is deemed as in/eligible by the reviewer. Preliminary evidence supports the utility of Research Screener for semi-automating the screening process (Chai et al., 2021). Briefly, across nine systematic reviews and two scoping reviews, Research Screener delivered a 60-90% workload saving, and estimated a conservative threshold of the need to screen no more than 50% of articles to assure that 100% of eligible articles are identified. EM and RL discussed uncertainty regarding the screening decision for 16 papers with DG, who made the executive decision regarding their suitability for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Reasons for study exclusion were summarised as part of the search and included in the data extraction flow diagram (see Figure 1).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2021.1977974\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2021.1977974","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

根据筛选标准，从团队已知的与纳入相关的现有文章中按重要性排序S，并根据审稿人认为符合条件的内容，每筛选50篇摘要，不断更新学习算法。初步证据支持Research Screener在半自动化筛选过程中的效用(Chai et al.， 2021)。简而言之，在9个系统审查和2个范围审查中，Research Screener节省了60-90%的工作量，并估计了一个保守的阈值，即需要筛选不超过50%的文章，以确保100%符合条件的文章被确定。EM和RL与DG讨论了16篇论文筛选决策的不确定性，DG对这些论文是否适合纳入meta分析做出了执行决定。排除研究的原因被总结为检索的一部分，并纳入数据提取流程图(见图1)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The effectiveness of stress regulation interventions with athletes: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

s in order of significance from existing articles known to the team as relevant for inclusion based on the screening criteria, and continuously updates the learning algorithm every 50 abstracts screened based on what is deemed as in/eligible by the reviewer. Preliminary evidence supports the utility of Research Screener for semi-automating the screening process (Chai et al., 2021). Briefly, across nine systematic reviews and two scoping reviews, Research Screener delivered a 60-90% workload saving, and estimated a conservative threshold of the need to screen no more than 50% of articles to assure that 100% of eligible articles are identified. EM and RL discussed uncertainty regarding the screening decision for 16 papers with DG, who made the executive decision regarding their suitability for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Reasons for study exclusion were summarised as part of the search and included in the data extraction flow diagram (see Figure 1).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

17.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology is the first scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes critical reviews of research literature in sport and exercise psychology. Typically, these reviews evaluate relevant conceptual and methodological issues in the field and provide a critique of the strengths and weaknesses of empirical studies that address common themes or hypotheses. The reviews present summaries of, and conclusions about, the current state of knowledge concerning topics of interest, as well as assessments of relevant unresolved issues and future trends. Reviews of research literature on theories, topics and issues that are at the interface with mainstream psychology are especially welcome.