针灸与中药结合治疗痔疮临床疗效的meta分析

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Mengjie Zeng, Xue-Hui Cheng, Geer Chen, Ji-you Kou
{"title":"针灸与中药结合治疗痔疮临床疗效的meta分析","authors":"Mengjie Zeng, Xue-Hui Cheng, Geer Chen, Ji-you Kou","doi":"10.3727/036012919x15650315071915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, surgical resection is the main method of the treatment of haemorrhoids, but is easy to recur after surgery. Recently, it is reported that acupuncture has a beneficial influence on haemorrhoids. Thus, whether acupuncture is effective in the treatment of haemorrhoids is the\n key in this meta-analysis. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the treatment of combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine in haemorrhoids by meta-analysis, which provide a scientific, effective and feasible evidence for clinical decision-making and practice. A systematic review and\n meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3. All RCTs about combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine versus Chinese medicine alone were selected and assessed for inclusion. The effective rate (ER), recurrence rate(RR),\n Symptom score before and after treatment (perianal edema, hemafecia, perianal pain, pruritus ani, prolapse of haemorrhoids) were the outcomes analyzed in this meta-analysis. II RCTs and 976 patients were included. The methodological quality of most included trials was low to moderate. In this\n meta-analysis, the clinical efficacy of combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine was more effective than only Chinese medicine used in haemorrhoids. The effective rate [OR=5.24,95%CI(3.72,7.40), P<O. OOOOI], recurrence rate [OR=O.29, 95%CI(O. II, O.73), P=O.009], perianal edema [WMD=-O.74,95%CI-O.90\n to-O.59, P<O. OOOOI], hemafecia[WMD=-O.78,95%CI-O.89 to-O.67. P<O. OOOOI], perianal pain[WMD=-O.72,95%CI-O.94 to-O.50, P<O. OOOOI], pruritus ani[WMD=-O.75,95%CI-O.92 to-O.58, P<O. OOOOI] and prolapse of haemorrhoids[WMD=-0.43,95%CI-O.84 to-O.02, P=O.04] were shown in this meta-analysis.(OR:odds\n ratio;CI:confidence interval;WMD: weighted mean difference). There was about 96% of the clinical efficiency in the treatment of acupuncture plus Chinese medicine in haemorrhoids and 89% of that used in Chinese medicine alone, which indicates clearly that 7% higher efficiency in the experimental\n group compared with the control group. The treatment of combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine in haemorrhoids is more useful than Chinese medicine alone applied in piles, which is shown in 91% of clinical effects in average.","PeriodicalId":50881,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of the combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine in the treatment of haemorrhoids\",\"authors\":\"Mengjie Zeng, Xue-Hui Cheng, Geer Chen, Ji-you Kou\",\"doi\":\"10.3727/036012919x15650315071915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At present, surgical resection is the main method of the treatment of haemorrhoids, but is easy to recur after surgery. Recently, it is reported that acupuncture has a beneficial influence on haemorrhoids. Thus, whether acupuncture is effective in the treatment of haemorrhoids is the\\n key in this meta-analysis. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the treatment of combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine in haemorrhoids by meta-analysis, which provide a scientific, effective and feasible evidence for clinical decision-making and practice. A systematic review and\\n meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3. All RCTs about combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine versus Chinese medicine alone were selected and assessed for inclusion. The effective rate (ER), recurrence rate(RR),\\n Symptom score before and after treatment (perianal edema, hemafecia, perianal pain, pruritus ani, prolapse of haemorrhoids) were the outcomes analyzed in this meta-analysis. II RCTs and 976 patients were included. The methodological quality of most included trials was low to moderate. In this\\n meta-analysis, the clinical efficacy of combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine was more effective than only Chinese medicine used in haemorrhoids. The effective rate [OR=5.24,95%CI(3.72,7.40), P<O. OOOOI], recurrence rate [OR=O.29, 95%CI(O. II, O.73), P=O.009], perianal edema [WMD=-O.74,95%CI-O.90\\n to-O.59, P<O. OOOOI], hemafecia[WMD=-O.78,95%CI-O.89 to-O.67. P<O. OOOOI], perianal pain[WMD=-O.72,95%CI-O.94 to-O.50, P<O. OOOOI], pruritus ani[WMD=-O.75,95%CI-O.92 to-O.58, P<O. OOOOI] and prolapse of haemorrhoids[WMD=-0.43,95%CI-O.84 to-O.02, P=O.04] were shown in this meta-analysis.(OR:odds\\n ratio;CI:confidence interval;WMD: weighted mean difference). There was about 96% of the clinical efficiency in the treatment of acupuncture plus Chinese medicine in haemorrhoids and 89% of that used in Chinese medicine alone, which indicates clearly that 7% higher efficiency in the experimental\\n group compared with the control group. The treatment of combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine in haemorrhoids is more useful than Chinese medicine alone applied in piles, which is shown in 91% of clinical effects in average.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3727/036012919x15650315071915\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/036012919x15650315071915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,手术切除是治疗痔疮的主要方法,但手术后容易复发。最近,有报道称针灸对痔疮有有益的影响。因此,针灸治疗痔疮是否有效是本荟萃分析的关键。通过荟萃分析,评价针灸与中药结合治疗痔疮的临床疗效,为临床决策和实践提供科学、有效、可行的依据。随机临床试验(rct)的系统回顾和荟萃分析。使用Review Manager 5.3进行meta分析。所有关于针灸和中药结合与单独使用中药的随机对照试验均被选择并评估纳入。有效率(ER)、复发率(RR)、治疗前后症状评分(肛周水肿、便血、肛周疼痛、瘙痒、痔疮脱垂)是本meta分析的结果。纳入2项随机对照试验和976例患者。大多数纳入的试验的方法学质量为低到中等。在本荟萃分析中,针灸与中药结合治疗痔疮的临床疗效比单纯使用中药更有效。有效率[OR=5.24,95%CI(3.72,7.40), P< 0.05]。,复发率[OR= 0。29日,95% ci (O。Ii, 0.73), p = 0。[009],肛周水肿[WMD=- 0.74,95%CI-O]。90 o。59岁的P < O。OOOOI],便血[大规模杀伤性武器= -O.78 ci-o 95%。89 to-O.67。P < O。[qh],肛周疼痛[WMD=- 0.72,95%CI-O]。94 o。50 P < O。WMD=- 0.75,95%CI-O。92 o。58岁的P < O。[qh]和痔疮脱垂[WMD=-0.43,95%CI-O]。84 o。02年,P = O。[04]在本荟萃分析中显示。(OR:优势比;CI:置信区间;WMD:加权平均差)。针灸结合中药治疗痔疮的临床有效率约为96%,单用中药治疗痔疮的临床有效率约为89%,明显表明实验组的疗效比对照组高7%。针灸与中医结合治疗痔疮比单纯中医治疗痔疮更有效,平均临床疗效达91%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of the combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine in the treatment of haemorrhoids
At present, surgical resection is the main method of the treatment of haemorrhoids, but is easy to recur after surgery. Recently, it is reported that acupuncture has a beneficial influence on haemorrhoids. Thus, whether acupuncture is effective in the treatment of haemorrhoids is the key in this meta-analysis. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the treatment of combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine in haemorrhoids by meta-analysis, which provide a scientific, effective and feasible evidence for clinical decision-making and practice. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3. All RCTs about combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine versus Chinese medicine alone were selected and assessed for inclusion. The effective rate (ER), recurrence rate(RR), Symptom score before and after treatment (perianal edema, hemafecia, perianal pain, pruritus ani, prolapse of haemorrhoids) were the outcomes analyzed in this meta-analysis. II RCTs and 976 patients were included. The methodological quality of most included trials was low to moderate. In this meta-analysis, the clinical efficacy of combination of acupuncture and Chinese medicine was more effective than only Chinese medicine used in haemorrhoids. The effective rate [OR=5.24,95%CI(3.72,7.40), P
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide an international forum for the exchange of ideas and promotion of basic and clinical research in acupuncture, electro-therapeutics, and related fields. The journal was established in order to make acupuncture and electro-therapeutics a universally acceptable branch of medicine through multidisciplinary research based on scientific disciplines. The final goal is to provide a better understanding of both the beneficial and adverse effects of these treatments in order to supplement or improve existing methods of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases in both Western and Oriental medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信