分压器偏置共发射极放大器近似计算的误差分析

Xinwu Chen, Jingjing Xue, Shuangbo Xie, W. Huang, Peng Wang, Ke Gong, Lijuan Zhong
{"title":"分压器偏置共发射极放大器近似计算的误差分析","authors":"Xinwu Chen, Jingjing Xue, Shuangbo Xie, W. Huang, Peng Wang, Ke Gong, Lijuan Zhong","doi":"10.4236/CS.2017.810017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voltage divider biasing common emitter amplifier is one of the core contents in analog circuit curriculum, and almost all of traditional textbooks apply approximate calculation method to estimate all characteristic parameters. In calculating quiescent point, transistor base current is generally ignored to get the approximate base potential and emitter current, then other operating parameters, and AC small signal parameters can be acquired. The main purpose of this paper is to compare traditional and Thevenin equivalent methods and to get the difference of the two methods. A Formula is given to calculate the error of the traditional method. Example calculating reveals that the traditional method can generate an error about 10%, and even severe for small signal amplifier with higher quiescent point.","PeriodicalId":63422,"journal":{"name":"电路与系统(英文)","volume":"08 1","pages":"247-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Error Analysis of Approximate Calculation of Voltage Divider Biased Common-Emitter Amplifier\",\"authors\":\"Xinwu Chen, Jingjing Xue, Shuangbo Xie, W. Huang, Peng Wang, Ke Gong, Lijuan Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/CS.2017.810017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Voltage divider biasing common emitter amplifier is one of the core contents in analog circuit curriculum, and almost all of traditional textbooks apply approximate calculation method to estimate all characteristic parameters. In calculating quiescent point, transistor base current is generally ignored to get the approximate base potential and emitter current, then other operating parameters, and AC small signal parameters can be acquired. The main purpose of this paper is to compare traditional and Thevenin equivalent methods and to get the difference of the two methods. A Formula is given to calculate the error of the traditional method. Example calculating reveals that the traditional method can generate an error about 10%, and even severe for small signal amplifier with higher quiescent point.\",\"PeriodicalId\":63422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"电路与系统(英文)\",\"volume\":\"08 1\",\"pages\":\"247-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"电路与系统(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/CS.2017.810017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"电路与系统(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/CS.2017.810017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

分压器偏置共射极放大器是模拟电路课程的核心内容之一,传统的教科书几乎都采用近似计算方法来估计所有的特性参数。在计算静态点时,通常忽略晶体管基极电流以获得近似的基极电势和发射极电流,然后可以获得其他操作参数,以及AC小信号参数。本文的主要目的是比较传统方法和Thevenin等效方法,并得出这两种方法的区别。给出了传统方法误差的计算公式。实例计算表明,对于静态点较高的小信号放大器,传统方法产生的误差约为10%,甚至严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Error Analysis of Approximate Calculation of Voltage Divider Biased Common-Emitter Amplifier
Voltage divider biasing common emitter amplifier is one of the core contents in analog circuit curriculum, and almost all of traditional textbooks apply approximate calculation method to estimate all characteristic parameters. In calculating quiescent point, transistor base current is generally ignored to get the approximate base potential and emitter current, then other operating parameters, and AC small signal parameters can be acquired. The main purpose of this paper is to compare traditional and Thevenin equivalent methods and to get the difference of the two methods. A Formula is given to calculate the error of the traditional method. Example calculating reveals that the traditional method can generate an error about 10%, and even severe for small signal amplifier with higher quiescent point.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
273
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信