临床医生在姑息治疗环境中使用丧亲风险筛查工具的观点探讨:一项定性研究

Q3 Nursing
Lois K. Lawler, E. Plunkett, Lise Johns, C. Noble, Rachel J. Wenke
{"title":"临床医生在姑息治疗环境中使用丧亲风险筛查工具的观点探讨:一项定性研究","authors":"Lois K. Lawler, E. Plunkett, Lise Johns, C. Noble, Rachel J. Wenke","doi":"10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To minimise the adverse outcomes of prolonged complex bereavement, health professionals need effective risk screening tools to identify those at risk. However, existing tools can be challenging to implement in the clinical setting. This qualitative study aimed to explore clinicians’ perspectives and experiences of using the Bereavement Risk Index (BRI) screening tool, including identifying barriers and enablers regarding its use and what they perceived as important domains in bereavement risk screening. Data was collected through semi-structured group and individual interviews and deductively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eleven participants employed in one regional palliative care service were interviewed. The results revealed three key implications: 1) a risk screening tool is highly beneficial, however contextual factors can limit its implementation; 2) clinician confidence in the tool and perception of the tool’s comprehensiveness are significant factors in its use; 3) feedback is needed as to whether clinicians’ assessment of bereavement risk remains accurate and valid in the longer term.","PeriodicalId":44115,"journal":{"name":"Bereavement Care","volume":"39 1","pages":"133 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of clinicians’ perspectives of using a bereavement risk screening tool in a palliative care setting: a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Lois K. Lawler, E. Plunkett, Lise Johns, C. Noble, Rachel J. Wenke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract To minimise the adverse outcomes of prolonged complex bereavement, health professionals need effective risk screening tools to identify those at risk. However, existing tools can be challenging to implement in the clinical setting. This qualitative study aimed to explore clinicians’ perspectives and experiences of using the Bereavement Risk Index (BRI) screening tool, including identifying barriers and enablers regarding its use and what they perceived as important domains in bereavement risk screening. Data was collected through semi-structured group and individual interviews and deductively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eleven participants employed in one regional palliative care service were interviewed. The results revealed three key implications: 1) a risk screening tool is highly beneficial, however contextual factors can limit its implementation; 2) clinician confidence in the tool and perception of the tool’s comprehensiveness are significant factors in its use; 3) feedback is needed as to whether clinicians’ assessment of bereavement risk remains accurate and valid in the longer term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bereavement Care\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"133 - 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bereavement Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bereavement Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要为了最大限度地减少长期复杂丧亲之痛的不良后果,卫生专业人员需要有效的风险筛查工具来识别风险人群。然而,现有的工具在临床环境中的实施可能具有挑战性。这项定性研究旨在探索临床医生使用丧亲风险指数(BRI)筛查工具的观点和经验,包括确定其使用的障碍和促成因素,以及他们认为丧亲风险筛查的重要领域。数据是通过半结构化的小组和个人访谈收集的,并使用理论领域框架进行演绎分析。采访了受雇于一个地区姑息治疗服务机构的11名参与者。研究结果揭示了三个关键含义:1)风险筛查工具非常有益,但背景因素可能会限制其实施;2) 临床医生对该工具的信心和对该工具全面性的感知是其使用的重要因素;3) 需要反馈临床医生对丧亲风险的评估是否长期准确有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of clinicians’ perspectives of using a bereavement risk screening tool in a palliative care setting: a qualitative study
Abstract To minimise the adverse outcomes of prolonged complex bereavement, health professionals need effective risk screening tools to identify those at risk. However, existing tools can be challenging to implement in the clinical setting. This qualitative study aimed to explore clinicians’ perspectives and experiences of using the Bereavement Risk Index (BRI) screening tool, including identifying barriers and enablers regarding its use and what they perceived as important domains in bereavement risk screening. Data was collected through semi-structured group and individual interviews and deductively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eleven participants employed in one regional palliative care service were interviewed. The results revealed three key implications: 1) a risk screening tool is highly beneficial, however contextual factors can limit its implementation; 2) clinician confidence in the tool and perception of the tool’s comprehensiveness are significant factors in its use; 3) feedback is needed as to whether clinicians’ assessment of bereavement risk remains accurate and valid in the longer term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bereavement Care
Bereavement Care SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信