波兰ARB建筑竞赛

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Journal of Slavic Linguistics Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1353/jsl.2021.0007

Maria Katarzyna Prenner, Daniel Bunčić

{"title":"波兰ARB建筑竞赛","authors":"Maria Katarzyna Prenner, Daniel Bunčić","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2021.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Polish has three quasi-synonymous impersonal constructions: the -no/-to construction, the reflexive impersonal, and the 3pl impersonal. This raises the question of what the differences between them are and how one of them is selected. This paper presents the results of an acceptability judgment test, which is informed by an explorative corpus study and examines the following factors: colloquial vs. neutral register; perfective vs. imperfective aspect; present tense vs. preterite; and generic vs. specific reading. The main findings are that the 3pl impersonal turned out to be better in colloquial discourse and the reflexive impersonal is much more acceptable with the imperfective than with the perfective aspect. Furthermore, the corpus data and the acceptability judgments show numerically that both reflexive and 3pl impersonal have a certain tendency towards present tense and generic reading, and that the -no/-to construction is more typical with the perfective than the imperfective aspect.","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"29 1","pages":"201 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Competition of ARB Constructions in Polish\",\"authors\":\"Maria Katarzyna Prenner, Daniel Bunčić\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jsl.2021.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Polish has three quasi-synonymous impersonal constructions: the -no/-to construction, the reflexive impersonal, and the 3pl impersonal. This raises the question of what the differences between them are and how one of them is selected. This paper presents the results of an acceptability judgment test, which is informed by an explorative corpus study and examines the following factors: colloquial vs. neutral register; perfective vs. imperfective aspect; present tense vs. preterite; and generic vs. specific reading. The main findings are that the 3pl impersonal turned out to be better in colloquial discourse and the reflexive impersonal is much more acceptable with the imperfective than with the perfective aspect. Furthermore, the corpus data and the acceptability judgments show numerically that both reflexive and 3pl impersonal have a certain tendency towards present tense and generic reading, and that the -no/-to construction is more typical with the perfective than the imperfective aspect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Slavic Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"201 - 220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Slavic Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2021.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2021.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要：波兰语有三种准同义的非人格结构：否定结构、反身非人格结构和3pl非人格结构。这就提出了一个问题，即它们之间的区别是什么，以及如何选择其中一个。本文介绍了可接受性判断测试的结果，该测试由探索性语料库研究提供，并考察了以下因素：口语与中性语域；完全方面与不完全方面；现在时与前仪式；以及一般阅读与特定阅读。主要研究结果表明，第三人称非人称在口语中表现得更好，反身非人称在不完全体中比在完成体中更容易被接受。此外，语料库数据和可接受性判断在数字上表明，反身和3pl非人称都有一定的现在时和一般阅读倾向，而且-no/-to结构在完成体方面比在不完成体方面更典型。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Competition of ARB Constructions in Polish

Abstract:Polish has three quasi-synonymous impersonal constructions: the -no/-to construction, the reflexive impersonal, and the 3pl impersonal. This raises the question of what the differences between them are and how one of them is selected. This paper presents the results of an acceptability judgment test, which is informed by an explorative corpus study and examines the following factors: colloquial vs. neutral register; perfective vs. imperfective aspect; present tense vs. preterite; and generic vs. specific reading. The main findings are that the 3pl impersonal turned out to be better in colloquial discourse and the reflexive impersonal is much more acceptable with the imperfective than with the perfective aspect. Furthermore, the corpus data and the acceptability judgments show numerically that both reflexive and 3pl impersonal have a certain tendency towards present tense and generic reading, and that the -no/-to construction is more typical with the perfective than the imperfective aspect.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Slavic Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Slavic Linguistics, or JSL, is the official journal of the Slavic Linguistics Society. JSL publishes research articles and book reviews that address the description and analysis of Slavic languages and that are of general interest to linguists. Published papers deal with any aspect of synchronic or diachronic Slavic linguistics – phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, or pragmatics – which raises substantive problems of broad theoretical concern or proposes significant descriptive generalizations. Comparative studies and formal analyses are also published. Different theoretical orientations are represented in the journal. One volume (two issues) is published per year, ca. 360 pp.