女子大满贯网球比赛中的符号分析

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
Kinesiology Pub Date : 2021-06-16 DOI:10.26582/k.53.1.18
A. Sánchez-Pay, José Antonio Ortega-Soto, B. Sánchez-Alcaraz
{"title":"女子大满贯网球比赛中的符号分析","authors":"A. Sánchez-Pay, José Antonio Ortega-Soto, B. Sánchez-Alcaraz","doi":"10.26582/k.53.1.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grand\nSlam tennis tournaments are played on different surfaces. The aims of the\npresent study were to analyse the technical differences in the Grand Slam\ntournaments (Australian Open or AO, Roland Garros or RG, Wimbledon or W, and the\nUnited States Open or US), as well as to establish differences between winning\nand losing players. A total of 580 sets in 248 matches played in Grand Slams\nbetween 2017 and 2018 were analysed. To observe differences between the tournaments,\na one-way analysis of variance (Kruskal Wallis) with the Bonferroni post-hoc\ntest was performed. Univariate (Wilcoxon test) analysis of data was carried out\nto show the differences between the winning and losing performances\nof sets. Players who\nhad more aces, points won on the 1st serve, winning shots and net points won\nmore matches in the AO, W and US than in the RG (p<.05). However, in RG,\nplayers won more receiving points (43.56% of the points played) with chances to\nbreak the opponents’ service game. The results also showed that the winning\nplayers were superior in both service and receiving, and the most influential\nvariables on the outcome of the match were percentage of receiving points won,\nbreak points won, and percentage of points won on the first serve. Such knowledge may have\nimplications in the design of appropriate game strategies and specific training\nsessions to improve performance in professional women’s tennis.","PeriodicalId":49943,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notational analysis in female grand slam tennis competitions\",\"authors\":\"A. Sánchez-Pay, José Antonio Ortega-Soto, B. Sánchez-Alcaraz\",\"doi\":\"10.26582/k.53.1.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Grand\\nSlam tennis tournaments are played on different surfaces. The aims of the\\npresent study were to analyse the technical differences in the Grand Slam\\ntournaments (Australian Open or AO, Roland Garros or RG, Wimbledon or W, and the\\nUnited States Open or US), as well as to establish differences between winning\\nand losing players. A total of 580 sets in 248 matches played in Grand Slams\\nbetween 2017 and 2018 were analysed. To observe differences between the tournaments,\\na one-way analysis of variance (Kruskal Wallis) with the Bonferroni post-hoc\\ntest was performed. Univariate (Wilcoxon test) analysis of data was carried out\\nto show the differences between the winning and losing performances\\nof sets. Players who\\nhad more aces, points won on the 1st serve, winning shots and net points won\\nmore matches in the AO, W and US than in the RG (p<.05). However, in RG,\\nplayers won more receiving points (43.56% of the points played) with chances to\\nbreak the opponents’ service game. The results also showed that the winning\\nplayers were superior in both service and receiving, and the most influential\\nvariables on the outcome of the match were percentage of receiving points won,\\nbreak points won, and percentage of points won on the first serve. Such knowledge may have\\nimplications in the design of appropriate game strategies and specific training\\nsessions to improve performance in professional women’s tennis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26582/k.53.1.18\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26582/k.53.1.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

大满贯网球锦标赛在不同的场地举行。本研究的目的是分析大满贯赛事(澳网或AO,罗兰加洛斯或RG,温布尔登或W,以及美国公开赛或US)的技术差异,并确定输赢球员之间的差异。分析了2017年至2018年大满贯赛事的248场比赛中的580局。为了观察比赛之间的差异,进行了单向方差分析(Kruskal Wallis)和Bonferroni赛后检验。对数据进行单变量(Wilcoxon检验)分析,以显示各组输赢表现之间的差异。在澳网、澳网和美网中,得分、第一发球得分、制胜球和净胜分较多的选手比在澳网、美网中获胜的选手多(p< 0.05)。然而,在RG中,有机会打破对手发球局的球员赢得了更多的接发球分(43.56%的得分)。结果还显示,获胜选手在发球和接发球方面都更胜一筹,而对比赛结果影响最大的变量是接发球得分的百分比、破发得分的百分比和首发得分的百分比。这些知识可能会对设计合适的比赛策略和特定的训练课程产生影响,以提高职业女子网球的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Notational analysis in female grand slam tennis competitions
Grand Slam tennis tournaments are played on different surfaces. The aims of the present study were to analyse the technical differences in the Grand Slam tournaments (Australian Open or AO, Roland Garros or RG, Wimbledon or W, and the United States Open or US), as well as to establish differences between winning and losing players. A total of 580 sets in 248 matches played in Grand Slams between 2017 and 2018 were analysed. To observe differences between the tournaments, a one-way analysis of variance (Kruskal Wallis) with the Bonferroni post-hoc test was performed. Univariate (Wilcoxon test) analysis of data was carried out to show the differences between the winning and losing performances of sets. Players who had more aces, points won on the 1st serve, winning shots and net points won more matches in the AO, W and US than in the RG (p<.05). However, in RG, players won more receiving points (43.56% of the points played) with chances to break the opponents’ service game. The results also showed that the winning players were superior in both service and receiving, and the most influential variables on the outcome of the match were percentage of receiving points won, break points won, and percentage of points won on the first serve. Such knowledge may have implications in the design of appropriate game strategies and specific training sessions to improve performance in professional women’s tennis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kinesiology
Kinesiology REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Kinesiology – International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Kinesiology (print ISSN 1331- 1441, online ISSN 1848-638X) publishes twice a year scientific papers and other written material from kinesiology (a scientific discipline which investigates art and science of human movement; in the meaning and scope close to the idiom “sport sciences”) and other adjacent human sciences focused on sport and exercise, primarily from anthropology (biological and cultural alike), medicine, sociology, psychology, natural sciences and mathematics applied to sport in its broadest sense, history, and others. Contributions of high scientific interest, including also results of theoretical analyses and their practical application in physical education, sport, physical recreation and kinesitherapy, are accepted for publication. The following sections define the scope of the journal: Sport and sports activities, Physical education, Recreation/leisure, Kinesiological anthropology, Training methods, Biology of sport and exercise, Sports medicine and physiology of sport, Biomechanics, History of sport and Book reviews with news.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信