质疑司法公正

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2019-09-25 DOI:10.1075/jaic.17026.plu

H. Plug

{"title":"质疑司法公正","authors":"H. Plug","doi":"10.1075/jaic.17026.plu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Impartiality is one of the core values underlying the\n administration of justice. A complaint about a judge’s supposed lack of\n impartiality may be filed on the grounds of the judge’s verbal behavior. In this\n article I will analyze complaints that concern the judge’s use of rhetorical\n questions during court hearings. I will explore what role these complaints may\n play in the strategic maneuvering of a party who seeks the judge’s\n disqualification.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging judicial impartiality\",\"authors\":\"H. Plug\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jaic.17026.plu\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Impartiality is one of the core values underlying the\\n administration of justice. A complaint about a judge’s supposed lack of\\n impartiality may be filed on the grounds of the judge’s verbal behavior. In this\\n article I will analyze complaints that concern the judge’s use of rhetorical\\n questions during court hearings. I will explore what role these complaints may\\n play in the strategic maneuvering of a party who seeks the judge’s\\n disqualification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Argumentation in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17026.plu\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17026.plu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

公正是司法的核心价值之一。对法官所谓缺乏公正性的投诉可以基于法官的言语行为提出。在这篇文章中，我将分析与法官在庭审中使用修辞问题有关的投诉。我将探讨这些投诉在寻求取消法官资格的一方的战略策略中可能扮演什么角色。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Challenging judicial impartiality

Impartiality is one of the core values underlying the administration of justice. A complaint about a judge’s supposed lack of impartiality may be filed on the grounds of the judge’s verbal behavior. In this article I will analyze complaints that concern the judge’s use of rhetorical questions during court hearings. I will explore what role these complaints may play in the strategic maneuvering of a party who seeks the judge’s disqualification.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Argumentation in Context COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.