科学教师TPACK量表评分标准的效度与信度

Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI:10.30870/jppi.v8i1.11164
Raden Ahmad Hadian Adhy Permana, A. Widodo
{"title":"科学教师TPACK量表评分标准的效度与信度","authors":"Raden Ahmad Hadian Adhy Permana, A. Widodo","doi":"10.30870/jppi.v8i1.11164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the content validity of the scoring rubric instrument for measuring science teachers’ TPACK and the inter-rater reliability in using the instrument. This research was conducted as part of research and development which has been designed for the development of instruments for measuring teacher knowledge. The analysis carried out was a qualitative analysis based on triangulation of the three validators’ validation results and quantitative analysis for inter-rater reliability based on the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) obtained for each question. The validation involved three science education experts from the university to assess the suitability of the scoring rubrics in the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. Inter-rater reliability examining involved 100 participants who answered 15 questions on the instrument and three experienced raters to assess the participants' answers. The validation results showed that the instrument content was valid for measuring the knowledge tested and had very high inter-rater reliability coefficient for all items The validation results show that qualitatively the contents of the instrument are valid for measuring the knowledge being tested and had an average inter-rater reliability coefficient of 0.94 (very high).","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Inter-rater Reliability of the Scoring Rubrics for the Science Teacher TPACK Test Instrument\",\"authors\":\"Raden Ahmad Hadian Adhy Permana, A. Widodo\",\"doi\":\"10.30870/jppi.v8i1.11164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the content validity of the scoring rubric instrument for measuring science teachers’ TPACK and the inter-rater reliability in using the instrument. This research was conducted as part of research and development which has been designed for the development of instruments for measuring teacher knowledge. The analysis carried out was a qualitative analysis based on triangulation of the three validators’ validation results and quantitative analysis for inter-rater reliability based on the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) obtained for each question. The validation involved three science education experts from the university to assess the suitability of the scoring rubrics in the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. Inter-rater reliability examining involved 100 participants who answered 15 questions on the instrument and three experienced raters to assess the participants' answers. The validation results showed that the instrument content was valid for measuring the knowledge tested and had very high inter-rater reliability coefficient for all items The validation results show that qualitatively the contents of the instrument are valid for measuring the knowledge being tested and had an average inter-rater reliability coefficient of 0.94 (very high).\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v8i1.11164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v8i1.11164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究检验了科学教师TPACK量表的内容效度及量表使用时的信度。本研究是为开发测量教师知识的工具而设计的研究与开发的一部分。对三位验证者的验证结果进行三角剖分进行定性分析,并根据每个问题的类内相关系数(Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC)进行定量分析。该验证涉及三位来自该大学的科学教育专家,以评估技术教学内容知识(TPACK)框架中评分规则的适用性。评估者之间的可靠性测试涉及100名参与者,他们在仪器上回答15个问题,并由3名经验丰富的评估者评估参与者的答案。验证结果表明,量表内容对被测知识的测量是有效的,对所有项目都有很高的信度系数。验证结果表明,量表内容对被测知识的测量在定性上是有效的,平均信度系数为0.94(很高)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Validity and Inter-rater Reliability of the Scoring Rubrics for the Science Teacher TPACK Test Instrument
This study examined the content validity of the scoring rubric instrument for measuring science teachers’ TPACK and the inter-rater reliability in using the instrument. This research was conducted as part of research and development which has been designed for the development of instruments for measuring teacher knowledge. The analysis carried out was a qualitative analysis based on triangulation of the three validators’ validation results and quantitative analysis for inter-rater reliability based on the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) obtained for each question. The validation involved three science education experts from the university to assess the suitability of the scoring rubrics in the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. Inter-rater reliability examining involved 100 participants who answered 15 questions on the instrument and three experienced raters to assess the participants' answers. The validation results showed that the instrument content was valid for measuring the knowledge tested and had very high inter-rater reliability coefficient for all items The validation results show that qualitatively the contents of the instrument are valid for measuring the knowledge being tested and had an average inter-rater reliability coefficient of 0.94 (very high).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信