超越问责制的外部:从内部构建可持续性问责制

IF 5.2 4区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Magnus Frostenson, Leanne Johnstone
{"title":"超越问责制的外部:从内部构建可持续性问责制","authors":"Magnus Frostenson, Leanne Johnstone","doi":"10.1108/sampj-04-2022-0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMotivated to know more about the internal means through which accountability for sustainability takes shape within organisations (in what ways and by whom), this paper aims to explore how accountability for sustainability is constructed within an organisation during a process of establishing a control system for sustainability.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper adopts a qualitative case study approach of a decentralised industrial group, operating mainly in Scandinavia, between 2017 and 2020. Both primary and secondary data are used (e.g. document analyses, semi-structured interviews, informal conversations and site visits) to inform the findings and analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings reveal a multi-faceted path towards accountability for sustainability that involves several concerns and priorities at organisational and individual levels, resulting in a separate sustainability control systems within each subsidiary company. Although hierarchical structures for accountability exist, socialising accountability activities are needed to (further) mobilise sustainable accounts.\n\n\nPractical implications\nSuccessful sustainable control systems require employees making sense of formalised accountability instruments (e.g. policies and procedures) to establish their roles and responsibilities in organisations.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis paper proposes socialisation processes as important for driving forward sustainability solutions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study elaborates on the internal accountability dynamic for the construction of sustainable accounts. Its novelty is built upon the interaction of hierarchical and socialising accountability forms as necessary for establishing a control system for sustainability. It furthermore illustrates the relationship between the external and internal pathways of accountability.\n","PeriodicalId":22143,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving beyond the external face of accountability: constructing accountability for sustainability from within\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Frostenson, Leanne Johnstone\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sampj-04-2022-0198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nMotivated to know more about the internal means through which accountability for sustainability takes shape within organisations (in what ways and by whom), this paper aims to explore how accountability for sustainability is constructed within an organisation during a process of establishing a control system for sustainability.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper adopts a qualitative case study approach of a decentralised industrial group, operating mainly in Scandinavia, between 2017 and 2020. Both primary and secondary data are used (e.g. document analyses, semi-structured interviews, informal conversations and site visits) to inform the findings and analysis.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings reveal a multi-faceted path towards accountability for sustainability that involves several concerns and priorities at organisational and individual levels, resulting in a separate sustainability control systems within each subsidiary company. Although hierarchical structures for accountability exist, socialising accountability activities are needed to (further) mobilise sustainable accounts.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nSuccessful sustainable control systems require employees making sense of formalised accountability instruments (e.g. policies and procedures) to establish their roles and responsibilities in organisations.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThis paper proposes socialisation processes as important for driving forward sustainability solutions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study elaborates on the internal accountability dynamic for the construction of sustainable accounts. Its novelty is built upon the interaction of hierarchical and socialising accountability forms as necessary for establishing a control system for sustainability. It furthermore illustrates the relationship between the external and internal pathways of accountability.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":22143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-04-2022-0198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-04-2022-0198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了了解更多关于可持续发展问责制在组织内部形成的内部手段(以什么方式和由谁),本文旨在探讨在建立可持续发展控制系统的过程中,如何在组织内部构建可持续发展问责制。设计/方法/方法本文采用定性案例研究的方法,一个分散的工业集团,主要在斯堪的纳维亚半岛,在2017年和2020年之间。主要和次要数据(例如文件分析、半结构化访谈、非正式谈话和实地考察)都被用来为调查结果和分析提供信息。研究结果研究结果揭示了可持续发展责任的多方面路径,涉及组织和个人层面的几个关注点和优先事项,导致每个子公司都有单独的可持续发展控制系统。尽管存在问责的等级结构,但需要社会化问责活动来(进一步)调动可持续账户。实际意义成功的可持续控制系统要求员工理解正式的问责工具(如政策和程序),以确定他们在组织中的角色和责任。社会影响本文提出社会化过程对于推动可持续发展解决方案非常重要。原创性/价值本研究阐述了可持续会计构建的内部问责动态。它的新颖性是建立在等级和社会化的问责形式之间的相互作用之上,这是建立可持续性控制系统所必需的。它进一步说明了问责的外部途径和内部途径之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving beyond the external face of accountability: constructing accountability for sustainability from within
Purpose Motivated to know more about the internal means through which accountability for sustainability takes shape within organisations (in what ways and by whom), this paper aims to explore how accountability for sustainability is constructed within an organisation during a process of establishing a control system for sustainability. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a qualitative case study approach of a decentralised industrial group, operating mainly in Scandinavia, between 2017 and 2020. Both primary and secondary data are used (e.g. document analyses, semi-structured interviews, informal conversations and site visits) to inform the findings and analysis. Findings The findings reveal a multi-faceted path towards accountability for sustainability that involves several concerns and priorities at organisational and individual levels, resulting in a separate sustainability control systems within each subsidiary company. Although hierarchical structures for accountability exist, socialising accountability activities are needed to (further) mobilise sustainable accounts. Practical implications Successful sustainable control systems require employees making sense of formalised accountability instruments (e.g. policies and procedures) to establish their roles and responsibilities in organisations. Social implications This paper proposes socialisation processes as important for driving forward sustainability solutions. Originality/value This study elaborates on the internal accountability dynamic for the construction of sustainable accounts. Its novelty is built upon the interaction of hierarchical and socialising accountability forms as necessary for establishing a control system for sustainability. It furthermore illustrates the relationship between the external and internal pathways of accountability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信