关于在Well Child就诊时筛查破坏性行为问题的临床实践指南:关于父母行为关注准确性的文献快速回顾

R. Baillargeon, M. Charette, François Tessier, K. Brand
{"title":"关于在Well Child就诊时筛查破坏性行为问题的临床实践指南:关于父母行为关注准确性的文献快速回顾","authors":"R. Baillargeon, M. Charette, François Tessier, K. Brand","doi":"10.21926/obm.icm.2203031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current recommendations of the Canadian Paediatric Society about monitoring children’s disruptive behaviors at well-child visits call for screening if behavioral concerns are being raised by parents. But do parents’ concerns about their child’s behavior constitute a reliable means for primary care providers (PCPs) to decide either in favor or against screening? We conducted a rapid systematic review of the literature by identifying documents that cited the landmark study by Glascoe and her colleagues (1991) on the accuracy of behavioral concerns at identifying children with a disruptive behavior problem. Citation tracking was done using Web of Science (Core Collection; 17 October 2018) and SCOPUS (19 October 2018). Only one recent published study was identified. The calibration of concerns’ specificity (and other indices alike) yielded, at best, a fair value of the weighted kappa coefficient κ(0,0) (i.e., 0.255 and 0.094). Also, the calibration of concerns’ sensitivity (and other indices alike) yielded, at best, a moderate value of the weighted kappa coefficient κ(1,0) (i.e., 0.533 and 0.392). Overall, the results do not support the current recommendations. In fact, behavioral concerns do not provide PCPs with enough information to reach a decision about screening. We discuss different ways of gathering the necessary information.","PeriodicalId":74333,"journal":{"name":"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Practice Guidelines About Screening for Disruptive Behavior Problems at Well-Child Visits: A Rapid Review of the Literature on the Accuracy of Parents’ Behavioral Concerns\",\"authors\":\"R. Baillargeon, M. Charette, François Tessier, K. Brand\",\"doi\":\"10.21926/obm.icm.2203031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current recommendations of the Canadian Paediatric Society about monitoring children’s disruptive behaviors at well-child visits call for screening if behavioral concerns are being raised by parents. But do parents’ concerns about their child’s behavior constitute a reliable means for primary care providers (PCPs) to decide either in favor or against screening? We conducted a rapid systematic review of the literature by identifying documents that cited the landmark study by Glascoe and her colleagues (1991) on the accuracy of behavioral concerns at identifying children with a disruptive behavior problem. Citation tracking was done using Web of Science (Core Collection; 17 October 2018) and SCOPUS (19 October 2018). Only one recent published study was identified. The calibration of concerns’ specificity (and other indices alike) yielded, at best, a fair value of the weighted kappa coefficient κ(0,0) (i.e., 0.255 and 0.094). Also, the calibration of concerns’ sensitivity (and other indices alike) yielded, at best, a moderate value of the weighted kappa coefficient κ(1,0) (i.e., 0.533 and 0.392). Overall, the results do not support the current recommendations. In fact, behavioral concerns do not provide PCPs with enough information to reach a decision about screening. We discuss different ways of gathering the necessary information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.icm.2203031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.icm.2203031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大儿科学会目前的建议是,在健康儿童访视中监测儿童的破坏性行为,要求对父母是否提出了行为担忧进行筛查。但是,父母对孩子行为的担忧是否构成初级保健提供者(pcp)决定支持或反对筛查的可靠手段?我们对文献进行了快速系统的回顾,找出了引用Glascoe和她的同事(1991)的里程碑式研究的文件,该研究是关于行为关注在识别具有破坏性行为问题的儿童方面的准确性。引文跟踪使用Web of Science (Core Collection;2018年10月17日)和SCOPUS(2018年10月19日)。只有最近发表的一项研究得到了证实。对关注的特异性(以及其他类似的指标)的校准最多产生一个加权kappa系数κ(0,0)的公允值(即0.255和0.094)。此外,对关注点的敏感性(以及其他类似指标)的校准最多产生一个加权kappa系数κ(1,0)的中等值(即0.533和0.392)。总的来说,研究结果并不支持目前的建议。事实上,对行为的关注并不能为pcp提供足够的信息来决定是否进行筛查。我们讨论了收集必要信息的不同方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Practice Guidelines About Screening for Disruptive Behavior Problems at Well-Child Visits: A Rapid Review of the Literature on the Accuracy of Parents’ Behavioral Concerns
The current recommendations of the Canadian Paediatric Society about monitoring children’s disruptive behaviors at well-child visits call for screening if behavioral concerns are being raised by parents. But do parents’ concerns about their child’s behavior constitute a reliable means for primary care providers (PCPs) to decide either in favor or against screening? We conducted a rapid systematic review of the literature by identifying documents that cited the landmark study by Glascoe and her colleagues (1991) on the accuracy of behavioral concerns at identifying children with a disruptive behavior problem. Citation tracking was done using Web of Science (Core Collection; 17 October 2018) and SCOPUS (19 October 2018). Only one recent published study was identified. The calibration of concerns’ specificity (and other indices alike) yielded, at best, a fair value of the weighted kappa coefficient κ(0,0) (i.e., 0.255 and 0.094). Also, the calibration of concerns’ sensitivity (and other indices alike) yielded, at best, a moderate value of the weighted kappa coefficient κ(1,0) (i.e., 0.533 and 0.392). Overall, the results do not support the current recommendations. In fact, behavioral concerns do not provide PCPs with enough information to reach a decision about screening. We discuss different ways of gathering the necessary information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信