联合国非洲经济委员会发展指标,1980-1990年

Q2 Arts and Humanities
G. Serra
{"title":"联合国非洲经济委员会发展指标,1980-1990年","authors":"G. Serra","doi":"10.4000/histoiremesure.6942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reconstructs the discourse built by the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) on socio-economic indicators in the first decade of structural adjustment. While in the early 1980s such indicators were envisaged as a statistical language to translate the alternative ideas of the Lagos Plan of Action into an operational reality, over the course of the decade they were increasingly seen as tools to evaluate the human and social costs of the policies imposed by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. This shift in emphasis informs a reflection on the “governance of indicators”, problematizing the relationship between development visions and quantification, and the dynamics which prevented the ECA’s vision from shaping African statistics in the way that was intended.","PeriodicalId":39718,"journal":{"name":"Histoire et Mesure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development Indicators at the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, 1980-1990\",\"authors\":\"G. Serra\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/histoiremesure.6942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reconstructs the discourse built by the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) on socio-economic indicators in the first decade of structural adjustment. While in the early 1980s such indicators were envisaged as a statistical language to translate the alternative ideas of the Lagos Plan of Action into an operational reality, over the course of the decade they were increasingly seen as tools to evaluate the human and social costs of the policies imposed by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. This shift in emphasis informs a reflection on the “governance of indicators”, problematizing the relationship between development visions and quantification, and the dynamics which prevented the ECA’s vision from shaping African statistics in the way that was intended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Histoire et Mesure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Histoire et Mesure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/histoiremesure.6942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histoire et Mesure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/histoiremesure.6942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文重建了联合国非洲经济委员会(非洲经委会)关于结构调整第一个十年的社会经济指标的论述。虽然在1980年代初,这些指标被设想为一种统计语言,将《拉各斯行动计划》的备选想法转化为实际的业务,但在这十年中,它们越来越被视为评价世界银行和国际货币基金组织所实行的政策的人力和社会成本的工具。这种重点的转变引起了对“指标管理”的反思,对发展愿景与量化之间的关系以及阻碍非洲经委会愿景按照预期方式塑造非洲统计数据的动力提出了问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development Indicators at the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, 1980-1990
This article reconstructs the discourse built by the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) on socio-economic indicators in the first decade of structural adjustment. While in the early 1980s such indicators were envisaged as a statistical language to translate the alternative ideas of the Lagos Plan of Action into an operational reality, over the course of the decade they were increasingly seen as tools to evaluate the human and social costs of the policies imposed by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. This shift in emphasis informs a reflection on the “governance of indicators”, problematizing the relationship between development visions and quantification, and the dynamics which prevented the ECA’s vision from shaping African statistics in the way that was intended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Histoire et Mesure
Histoire et Mesure Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信