Diana Restrepo, Ana M. Zapata-Barco, Juan A. Escobar, David Mejía-Rodríguez, Daniela Parra-Dunoyer, Oscar Vargas, Luis Miguel Vélez, Iris T. Buriticá, Isabel Vélez, Sebastián Estrada, Diego F. Rojas-Gualdrón
{"title":"对《哥伦比亚预防、诊断和治疗自杀意念和/或行为临床实践指南》(收养)的批判性评估","authors":"Diana Restrepo, Ana M. Zapata-Barco, Juan A. Escobar, David Mejía-Rodríguez, Daniela Parra-Dunoyer, Oscar Vargas, Luis Miguel Vélez, Iris T. Buriticá, Isabel Vélez, Sebastián Estrada, Diego F. Rojas-Gualdrón","doi":"10.1016/j.rcp.2021.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Suicide is a complex, global public health problem. The Colombian clinical practice guideline provides relevant input for its prevention, diagnosis and treatment. The objective was to evaluate the methodological quality, credibility and applicability of the Colombian clinical practice guideline for suicidal behaviour.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An academic group of 12 evaluators was established to assess the guide and its recommendations in a standardised way, using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX instruments. The evaluations were given in the range of 0.0-1.0 with 0.7 as a cut-off point for appropriate quality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The global assessment of the AGREE-II was greater than 0.7 in the dimensions: “scope and objective” (0.86), “clarity of presentation” (0.89), “applicability” (0.73) and “editorial independence” (0.89). The lowest scores were for “participation of those involved” (0.67) and “rigour in preparation” (0.69). With the AGREE-REX, the results in all dimensions were below 0.70, which indicates lower quality and suitability for use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The adoption process of the Colombian guideline for suicidal behaviour was a rigorous methodological process, while the practice recommendations were valued as of low applicability due to low support in local evidence. It is necessary to strengthen the generation and synthesis of evidence at the national level to give greater support and applicability to the practice recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52477,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","volume":"53 1","pages":"Pages 85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valoración crítica de la guía de práctica clínica colombiana para la prevención, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la ideación y/o la conducta suicida (adopción)\",\"authors\":\"Diana Restrepo, Ana M. Zapata-Barco, Juan A. Escobar, David Mejía-Rodríguez, Daniela Parra-Dunoyer, Oscar Vargas, Luis Miguel Vélez, Iris T. Buriticá, Isabel Vélez, Sebastián Estrada, Diego F. Rojas-Gualdrón\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcp.2021.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Suicide is a complex, global public health problem. The Colombian clinical practice guideline provides relevant input for its prevention, diagnosis and treatment. The objective was to evaluate the methodological quality, credibility and applicability of the Colombian clinical practice guideline for suicidal behaviour.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An academic group of 12 evaluators was established to assess the guide and its recommendations in a standardised way, using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX instruments. The evaluations were given in the range of 0.0-1.0 with 0.7 as a cut-off point for appropriate quality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The global assessment of the AGREE-II was greater than 0.7 in the dimensions: “scope and objective” (0.86), “clarity of presentation” (0.89), “applicability” (0.73) and “editorial independence” (0.89). The lowest scores were for “participation of those involved” (0.67) and “rigour in preparation” (0.69). With the AGREE-REX, the results in all dimensions were below 0.70, which indicates lower quality and suitability for use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The adoption process of the Colombian guideline for suicidal behaviour was a rigorous methodological process, while the practice recommendations were valued as of low applicability due to low support in local evidence. It is necessary to strengthen the generation and synthesis of evidence at the national level to give greater support and applicability to the practice recommendations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 85-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745021001827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745021001827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Valoración crítica de la guía de práctica clínica colombiana para la prevención, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la ideación y/o la conducta suicida (adopción)
Introduction
Suicide is a complex, global public health problem. The Colombian clinical practice guideline provides relevant input for its prevention, diagnosis and treatment. The objective was to evaluate the methodological quality, credibility and applicability of the Colombian clinical practice guideline for suicidal behaviour.
Methods
An academic group of 12 evaluators was established to assess the guide and its recommendations in a standardised way, using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX instruments. The evaluations were given in the range of 0.0-1.0 with 0.7 as a cut-off point for appropriate quality.
Results
The global assessment of the AGREE-II was greater than 0.7 in the dimensions: “scope and objective” (0.86), “clarity of presentation” (0.89), “applicability” (0.73) and “editorial independence” (0.89). The lowest scores were for “participation of those involved” (0.67) and “rigour in preparation” (0.69). With the AGREE-REX, the results in all dimensions were below 0.70, which indicates lower quality and suitability for use.
Conclusions
The adoption process of the Colombian guideline for suicidal behaviour was a rigorous methodological process, while the practice recommendations were valued as of low applicability due to low support in local evidence. It is necessary to strengthen the generation and synthesis of evidence at the national level to give greater support and applicability to the practice recommendations.
期刊介绍:
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (RCP) is a quarterly official publication of Colombian Psychiatry Association (March, June, September and December) and its purpose is to spread different the knowledge models that currently constitute the theoretical and practical body of our specialty. Psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, non psychiatric physicians, psychologists, philosophers or other health professionals or persons interested in this area can take part in the magazine. This journal publishes original works, revision or updating articles, case reports of all psychiatry and mental health areas, epistemology, mind philosophy, bioethics and also articles about methodology of investigation and critical reading.