双歧杆菌联合呋喃唑酮四环素三联疗法抢救性根除幽门螺杆菌的疗程研究

Haitao Wang, Jie Zhang, Xiaozhong Jiang
{"title":"双歧杆菌联合呋喃唑酮四环素三联疗法抢救性根除幽门螺杆菌的疗程研究","authors":"Haitao Wang, Jie Zhang, Xiaozhong Jiang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6315.2020.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the effect of the eradication rate and adverse reactions of different courses of Bifidobacterium combined with quadruple therapy containing furazolidone and tetracycline for rescue eradication of Helicobacter pylori. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom December 2016 to May 2019, 348 patients with chronic gastritis who failed to eradicate Hp for the first time were selected from the outpatient department of digestive medicine of Kailuan General Hospital affiliated to North China University of Technology.Group A, B and C were randomly divided by Excel, Group A(116 patients): 14-day quadruple therapy (Eprazole+ colloidal bismuth pectin+ furazolidone + tetracycline); group B(116 patients): Bifidobacterium was given 14 days on the basis of treatment in group A; group C(116 patients): 7 days Bifidobacterium was given in the second week of treatment in group A 4 weeks after the end of eradication treatment, 14 C urea breath test was reexamined, to compare the eradication rate and the incidence of adverse reactions. \n \n \nResults \nThe eradication rates were 80.2%, 84.5% and 82.3% respectively according to intention treatment.The eradication rates were 88.6%, 90.7% and 89.7%, respectively according to perprotocol.There was no significant difference between the three groups(according to intention to treat analysis: χ2=0.755, P=0.685; according to the perprotocol analysis: χ2=0.271, P=0.873). The incidence of adverse reactions in three groups was 16.4%, 6.3% and 7.3% respectively, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=7.561, P=0.023). Group B was significantly lower than group A(χ2=5.570, P=0.017), the difference was statistically significant, but there was no statistically significant difference between group C and group A(χ2=4.362, P=0.037). \n \n \nConclusion \nAfter 14 days of Bifidobacterium tetrad live tablet assisted with tetrad therapy containing furazolidone and tetracycline, the adverse reactions could be significantly reduced, but Bifidobacterium could not significantly improve the eradication rate. \n \n \nKey words: \nHelicobacter pylori; Quadruple therapy; Eradication rate; Rescue eradication therapy; Bifidobacterium","PeriodicalId":10365,"journal":{"name":"中国综合临床","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the treatment course of Bifidobacterium combined with quadruple therapy including furazolidone and tetracycline for rescue eradication of Helicobacter pylori\",\"authors\":\"Haitao Wang, Jie Zhang, Xiaozhong Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6315.2020.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the effect of the eradication rate and adverse reactions of different courses of Bifidobacterium combined with quadruple therapy containing furazolidone and tetracycline for rescue eradication of Helicobacter pylori. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom December 2016 to May 2019, 348 patients with chronic gastritis who failed to eradicate Hp for the first time were selected from the outpatient department of digestive medicine of Kailuan General Hospital affiliated to North China University of Technology.Group A, B and C were randomly divided by Excel, Group A(116 patients): 14-day quadruple therapy (Eprazole+ colloidal bismuth pectin+ furazolidone + tetracycline); group B(116 patients): Bifidobacterium was given 14 days on the basis of treatment in group A; group C(116 patients): 7 days Bifidobacterium was given in the second week of treatment in group A 4 weeks after the end of eradication treatment, 14 C urea breath test was reexamined, to compare the eradication rate and the incidence of adverse reactions. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe eradication rates were 80.2%, 84.5% and 82.3% respectively according to intention treatment.The eradication rates were 88.6%, 90.7% and 89.7%, respectively according to perprotocol.There was no significant difference between the three groups(according to intention to treat analysis: χ2=0.755, P=0.685; according to the perprotocol analysis: χ2=0.271, P=0.873). The incidence of adverse reactions in three groups was 16.4%, 6.3% and 7.3% respectively, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=7.561, P=0.023). Group B was significantly lower than group A(χ2=5.570, P=0.017), the difference was statistically significant, but there was no statistically significant difference between group C and group A(χ2=4.362, P=0.037). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nAfter 14 days of Bifidobacterium tetrad live tablet assisted with tetrad therapy containing furazolidone and tetracycline, the adverse reactions could be significantly reduced, but Bifidobacterium could not significantly improve the eradication rate. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nHelicobacter pylori; Quadruple therapy; Eradication rate; Rescue eradication therapy; Bifidobacterium\",\"PeriodicalId\":10365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国综合临床\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国综合临床\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6315.2020.02.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国综合临床","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6315.2020.02.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨双歧杆菌不同疗程联合呋喃唑酮和四环素四联疗法抢救根除幽门螺杆菌的效果及不良反应。方法选取2016年12月至2019年5月华北工业大学附属开滦总医院消化内科门诊首次Hp根除失败的慢性胃炎患者348例。A、B、C组采用Excel随机分组,A组(116例):14 d四联治疗(依哌唑+胶态铋果胶+呋喃唑酮+四环素);B组116例:在A组治疗的基础上给予双歧杆菌治疗14 d;C组(116例):治疗第2周给予双歧杆菌治疗,A组根除治疗结束4周后复查14c尿素呼气试验,比较根除率和不良反应发生率。结果意向治疗的根除率分别为80.2%、84.5%和82.3%。根据perprotocol,根除率分别为88.6%、90.7%和89.7%。三组间差异无统计学意义(按治疗意向分析:χ2=0.755, P=0.685;超协议分析:χ2=0.271, P=0.873)。三组患者不良反应发生率分别为16.4%、6.3%、7.3%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.561, P=0.023)。B组明显低于A组(χ2=5.570, P=0.017),差异有统计学意义;C组与A组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=4.362, P=0.037)。结论双歧杆菌四活片配合呋喃唑酮和四环素四活片治疗14 d后,不良反应明显减少,但双歧杆菌的根除率没有明显提高。关键词:幽门螺杆菌;四联疗法治疗过程中;根除率;抢救根除疗法;双歧杆菌属
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on the treatment course of Bifidobacterium combined with quadruple therapy including furazolidone and tetracycline for rescue eradication of Helicobacter pylori
Objective To explore the effect of the eradication rate and adverse reactions of different courses of Bifidobacterium combined with quadruple therapy containing furazolidone and tetracycline for rescue eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Methods From December 2016 to May 2019, 348 patients with chronic gastritis who failed to eradicate Hp for the first time were selected from the outpatient department of digestive medicine of Kailuan General Hospital affiliated to North China University of Technology.Group A, B and C were randomly divided by Excel, Group A(116 patients): 14-day quadruple therapy (Eprazole+ colloidal bismuth pectin+ furazolidone + tetracycline); group B(116 patients): Bifidobacterium was given 14 days on the basis of treatment in group A; group C(116 patients): 7 days Bifidobacterium was given in the second week of treatment in group A 4 weeks after the end of eradication treatment, 14 C urea breath test was reexamined, to compare the eradication rate and the incidence of adverse reactions. Results The eradication rates were 80.2%, 84.5% and 82.3% respectively according to intention treatment.The eradication rates were 88.6%, 90.7% and 89.7%, respectively according to perprotocol.There was no significant difference between the three groups(according to intention to treat analysis: χ2=0.755, P=0.685; according to the perprotocol analysis: χ2=0.271, P=0.873). The incidence of adverse reactions in three groups was 16.4%, 6.3% and 7.3% respectively, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=7.561, P=0.023). Group B was significantly lower than group A(χ2=5.570, P=0.017), the difference was statistically significant, but there was no statistically significant difference between group C and group A(χ2=4.362, P=0.037). Conclusion After 14 days of Bifidobacterium tetrad live tablet assisted with tetrad therapy containing furazolidone and tetracycline, the adverse reactions could be significantly reduced, but Bifidobacterium could not significantly improve the eradication rate. Key words: Helicobacter pylori; Quadruple therapy; Eradication rate; Rescue eradication therapy; Bifidobacterium
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16855
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine of China is an academic journal organized by the Chinese Medical Association (CMA), which mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and commentaries in the field. Clinical Medicine of China is a source journal of Peking University (2000 and 2004 editions), a core journal of Chinese science and technology, an academic journal of RCCSE China Core (Extended Edition), and has been published in Chemical Abstracts of the United States (CA), Abstracts Journal of Russia (AJ), Chinese Core Journals (Selection) Database, Chinese Science and Technology Materials Directory, Wanfang Database, China Academic Journal Database, JST Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (Japanese) (2018) and other databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信