在线学习平台与忏悔主题

IF 1.1 0 ARCHITECTURE

Architecture and Culture Pub Date : 2021-02-26 DOI:10.1080/20507828.2021.1888211

E. Dare

{"title":"在线学习平台与忏悔主题","authors":"E. Dare","doi":"10.1080/20507828.2021.1888211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Is there a connection between pedagogic practices of confessional reflectivity, online learning platforms, and the massively scaled surveillance of Higher Education student transactions via data analysis? It is the contention of this paper that there is an ideological and processual logic which connects these practices and platforms. It argues this logic has been benignly embedded in pedagogy, but has now become scaled via technologically deterministic paradigms, providing companies such as Pearson Ltd with monopolistic scope to dominate the epistemic foundations of teaching theory and practice. How these forces converge on the learning platform is the theme of this paper, which draws upon an arts and creative computation educational background rather than a specifically architectural context.","PeriodicalId":42146,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Culture","volume":"9 1","pages":"249 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20507828.2021.1888211","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Learning Platforms and the Confessional Subject\",\"authors\":\"E. Dare\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20507828.2021.1888211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Is there a connection between pedagogic practices of confessional reflectivity, online learning platforms, and the massively scaled surveillance of Higher Education student transactions via data analysis? It is the contention of this paper that there is an ideological and processual logic which connects these practices and platforms. It argues this logic has been benignly embedded in pedagogy, but has now become scaled via technologically deterministic paradigms, providing companies such as Pearson Ltd with monopolistic scope to dominate the epistemic foundations of teaching theory and practice. How these forces converge on the learning platform is the theme of this paper, which draws upon an arts and creative computation educational background rather than a specifically architectural context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture and Culture\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"249 - 259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20507828.2021.1888211\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2021.1888211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2021.1888211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

忏悔反思性的教学实践、在线学习平台和通过数据分析对高等教育学生交易的大规模监控之间是否存在联系?本文的论点是，这些实践和平台之间存在着一种思想和过程逻辑。它认为，这种逻辑已经被良性地嵌入到教育学中，但现在已经通过技术确定性范式扩大了规模，为培生有限公司等公司提供了垄断范围，以主导教学理论和实践的认知基础。这些力量如何汇聚在学习平台上是本文的主题，它借鉴了艺术和创造性计算的教育背景，而不是特定的建筑背景。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Online Learning Platforms and the Confessional Subject

Abstract Is there a connection between pedagogic practices of confessional reflectivity, online learning platforms, and the massively scaled surveillance of Higher Education student transactions via data analysis? It is the contention of this paper that there is an ideological and processual logic which connects these practices and platforms. It argues this logic has been benignly embedded in pedagogy, but has now become scaled via technologically deterministic paradigms, providing companies such as Pearson Ltd with monopolistic scope to dominate the epistemic foundations of teaching theory and practice. How these forces converge on the learning platform is the theme of this paper, which draws upon an arts and creative computation educational background rather than a specifically architectural context.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Architecture and Culture ARCHITECTURE-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Architecture and Culture, the international award winning, peer-reviewed journal of the Architectural Humanities Research Association, investigates the relationship between architecture and the culture that shapes and is shaped by it. Whether culture is understood extensively, as shared experience of everyday life, or in terms of the rules and habits of different disciplinary practices, Architecture and Culture asks how architecture participates in and engages with it – and how both culture and architecture might be reciprocally transformed. Architecture and Culture publishes exploratory research that is purposively imaginative, rigorously speculative, visually and verbally stimulating. From architects, artists and urban designers, film-makers, animators and poets, from historians of culture and architecture, from geographers, anthropologists and other social scientists, from thinkers and writers of all kinds, established and new, it solicits essays, critical reviews, interviews, fictional narratives in both images and words, art and building projects, and design hypotheses. Architecture and Culture aims to promote a conversation between all those who are curious about what architecture might be and what it can do.