拯救混战/抢劫式案件

IF 0.3 3区文学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition Pub Date : 2023-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s12136-023-00547-2

Pablo Rychter

{"title":"拯救混战/抢劫式案件","authors":"Pablo Rychter","doi":"10.1007/s12136-023-00547-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A good part of the philosophical debate on free will and moral responsibility in the last fifty years has revolved around so-called Frankfurt-style cases. One of the most important milestones in this debate is the case described by Mele and Robb (1998), which was intended to avoid some earlier objections directed at Frankfurt’s original argument. However, the success of Mele and Robb’s case has been contested by Pereboom (2001), Widerker (2003), and Moya (2003, 2017), among others. The present paper aims to vindicate Mele and Robb’s (and Frankfurt’s) general argument by describing a variation of their case that overcomes or avoids the objections of those authors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":"38 4","pages":"689 - 705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-023-00547-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rescuing Mele/Robb-Style Cases\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Rychter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12136-023-00547-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A good part of the philosophical debate on free will and moral responsibility in the last fifty years has revolved around so-called Frankfurt-style cases. One of the most important milestones in this debate is the case described by Mele and Robb (1998), which was intended to avoid some earlier objections directed at Frankfurt’s original argument. However, the success of Mele and Robb’s case has been contested by Pereboom (2001), Widerker (2003), and Moya (2003, 2017), among others. The present paper aims to vindicate Mele and Robb’s (and Frankfurt’s) general argument by describing a variation of their case that overcomes or avoids the objections of those authors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"689 - 705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-023-00547-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12136-023-00547-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12136-023-00547-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去50年里，关于自由意志和道德责任的哲学辩论，很大一部分都围绕着所谓的法兰克福案例展开。这场辩论中最重要的里程碑之一是Mele和Robb(1998)所描述的案例，该案例旨在避免早期针对法兰克福原始论点的一些反对意见。然而，Mele和Robb案例的成功受到了Pereboom(2001)、Widerker(2003)和Moya(2003、2017)等人的质疑。本文旨在通过描述他们的案例的一个变体来证明Mele和Robb(以及Frankfurt)的一般论点是正确的，该案例克服或避免了这些作者的反对意见。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Rescuing Mele/Robb-Style Cases

A good part of the philosophical debate on free will and moral responsibility in the last fifty years has revolved around so-called Frankfurt-style cases. One of the most important milestones in this debate is the case described by Mele and Robb (1998), which was intended to avoid some earlier objections directed at Frankfurt’s original argument. However, the success of Mele and Robb’s case has been contested by Pereboom (2001), Widerker (2003), and Moya (2003, 2017), among others. The present paper aims to vindicate Mele and Robb’s (and Frankfurt’s) general argument by describing a variation of their case that overcomes or avoids the objections of those authors.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Acta Analytica is an international journal for philosophy in the analytical tradition covering a variety of philosophical topics including philosophical logic, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of science and philosophy of mind. Special attention is devoted to cognitive science. The journal aims to promote a rigorous, argument-based approach in philosophy. Acta Analytica is a peer reviewed journal, published quarterly, with authors from all over the world.