单极狂:不可避免的诊断。关于一个案例的文献综述

Q4 Medicine
Felipe Vergara T., Jennifer Green M., Antonia Cooper S.
{"title":"单极狂:不可避免的诊断。关于一个案例的文献综述","authors":"Felipe Vergara T., Jennifer Green M., Antonia Cooper S.","doi":"10.4067/s0717-92272021000400302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Unipolar mania (UM) is a disorder that behaves differently from bipolar-I disorder (BP-I), however, it is not considered an independent entity by current diagnostic manuals, but rather included within the diagnosis of BP-I. Case report: A 21-year-old man presented a 3-month-long episode characterized by exalted mood and mood-congruent psychotic symptoms. The patient denies previous depressive episodes. Treatment with lithium and aripiprazole was established, which was satisfactory, not showing recurrence after 5 years of follow-up. Literature review and discussion: Diagnostic manuals describe that to diagnose BP-I the presence of a major depressive episode is not required, which implies that patients with UM fall into the same diagnostic category as patients with BP-I. Differences between UM and BP-I have been demonstrated in epidemiological, clinical, and genetic studies, therefore, including heterogeneous patients within the same category could hinder the interpretation of studies and limit advances in the knowledge of both disorders. Conclusion: Based on the literature review, it is suggested that UM should be recognized as an independent diagnosis. Despite its low prevalence, by validating it as such, in the future we could have more and better-quality data about this diagnosis. In this way, its distinctive characteristics can be defined more concretely, and therefore improve the clinical approach of these patients.","PeriodicalId":39300,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manía unipolar: un ineludible diagnóstico. Revisión de la literatura a propósito de un caso\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Vergara T., Jennifer Green M., Antonia Cooper S.\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0717-92272021000400302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Unipolar mania (UM) is a disorder that behaves differently from bipolar-I disorder (BP-I), however, it is not considered an independent entity by current diagnostic manuals, but rather included within the diagnosis of BP-I. Case report: A 21-year-old man presented a 3-month-long episode characterized by exalted mood and mood-congruent psychotic symptoms. The patient denies previous depressive episodes. Treatment with lithium and aripiprazole was established, which was satisfactory, not showing recurrence after 5 years of follow-up. Literature review and discussion: Diagnostic manuals describe that to diagnose BP-I the presence of a major depressive episode is not required, which implies that patients with UM fall into the same diagnostic category as patients with BP-I. Differences between UM and BP-I have been demonstrated in epidemiological, clinical, and genetic studies, therefore, including heterogeneous patients within the same category could hinder the interpretation of studies and limit advances in the knowledge of both disorders. Conclusion: Based on the literature review, it is suggested that UM should be recognized as an independent diagnosis. Despite its low prevalence, by validating it as such, in the future we could have more and better-quality data about this diagnosis. In this way, its distinctive characteristics can be defined more concretely, and therefore improve the clinical approach of these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-92272021000400302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-92272021000400302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:单极躁狂(UM)是一种表现不同于双相i型障碍(BP-I)的障碍,然而,目前的诊断手册不认为它是一个独立的实体,而是包括在BP-I的诊断中。病例报告:一名21岁的男性出现了长达3个月的发作,其特征是情绪高涨和情绪一致的精神病症状。病人否认有过抑郁发作。采用锂离子联合阿立哌唑治疗,5年随访无复发,效果满意。文献回顾和讨论:诊断手册描述,要诊断BP-I,不需要出现重度抑郁发作,这意味着UM患者与BP-I患者属于相同的诊断类别。UM和BP-I之间的差异已在流行病学、临床和遗传学研究中得到证实,因此,将异质患者纳入同一类别可能会阻碍研究的解释,并限制对这两种疾病的认识的进展。结论:在文献回顾的基础上,建议将UM视为一种独立的诊断。尽管它的患病率很低,但通过验证它,在未来我们可以获得更多和更高质量的关于这种诊断的数据。这样可以更具体地定义其独特的特征,从而改善这些患者的临床治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manía unipolar: un ineludible diagnóstico. Revisión de la literatura a propósito de un caso
Introduction: Unipolar mania (UM) is a disorder that behaves differently from bipolar-I disorder (BP-I), however, it is not considered an independent entity by current diagnostic manuals, but rather included within the diagnosis of BP-I. Case report: A 21-year-old man presented a 3-month-long episode characterized by exalted mood and mood-congruent psychotic symptoms. The patient denies previous depressive episodes. Treatment with lithium and aripiprazole was established, which was satisfactory, not showing recurrence after 5 years of follow-up. Literature review and discussion: Diagnostic manuals describe that to diagnose BP-I the presence of a major depressive episode is not required, which implies that patients with UM fall into the same diagnostic category as patients with BP-I. Differences between UM and BP-I have been demonstrated in epidemiological, clinical, and genetic studies, therefore, including heterogeneous patients within the same category could hinder the interpretation of studies and limit advances in the knowledge of both disorders. Conclusion: Based on the literature review, it is suggested that UM should be recognized as an independent diagnosis. Despite its low prevalence, by validating it as such, in the future we could have more and better-quality data about this diagnosis. In this way, its distinctive characteristics can be defined more concretely, and therefore improve the clinical approach of these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: La Revista Chilena de Neuro-psychiatry was established in 1947 and belongs to the Society of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, Chile (SONEPSYN), of which his body of scientific expression. The financial management of the magazine conducted the directory SONEPSYN. The editorial management is delegated to an editor and editorial committee, who have full freedom and independence in this area. Is a quarterly publication. The journal publishes original articles and unpublished covering basic and clinical aspects of the three specialties with ethics, medical education, physician-patient relationship, care management, public health, epidemiology, sociology and medical profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信