工党和左翼政党的纲领取向:显著性、效价和大衰退的影响

Q1 Social Sciences
M. Lisi
{"title":"工党和左翼政党的纲领取向:显著性、效价和大衰退的影响","authors":"M. Lisi","doi":"10.1080/23745118.2021.1935579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The steady weakening of the relationship between parties and civil society, in particular trade unions, has been the subject of considerable research. The same cannot be said, however, of the programmatic salience assigned by political parties to labour issues. This paper aims to explore how different party families relate to labour through a quantitative and qualitative approach. First, data from the MARPOR/Comparative Manifestos Project is used to compare the relative salience of labour in distinct party families, thus allowing us to analyse trends over time and across countries. Second, we focus on Southern Europe, before and after the crisis, to conduct a qualitative analysis of left-of-centre party positions toward labour. The findings suggest that labour issues are less salient in contemporary party platforms and that the mainstream left depoliticised this dimension of competition over the last decades. The historical links between parties and trade unions, the ideological legacies of left-of-centre parties and electoral pressures are the main factors that explain variations of party positions toward labour.","PeriodicalId":53479,"journal":{"name":"European Politics and Society","volume":"23 1","pages":"735 - 753"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23745118.2021.1935579","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labour and left-wing parties’ programmatic orientations: salience, valence and the impact of the Great Recession\",\"authors\":\"M. Lisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23745118.2021.1935579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The steady weakening of the relationship between parties and civil society, in particular trade unions, has been the subject of considerable research. The same cannot be said, however, of the programmatic salience assigned by political parties to labour issues. This paper aims to explore how different party families relate to labour through a quantitative and qualitative approach. First, data from the MARPOR/Comparative Manifestos Project is used to compare the relative salience of labour in distinct party families, thus allowing us to analyse trends over time and across countries. Second, we focus on Southern Europe, before and after the crisis, to conduct a qualitative analysis of left-of-centre party positions toward labour. The findings suggest that labour issues are less salient in contemporary party platforms and that the mainstream left depoliticised this dimension of competition over the last decades. The historical links between parties and trade unions, the ideological legacies of left-of-centre parties and electoral pressures are the main factors that explain variations of party positions toward labour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Politics and Society\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"735 - 753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23745118.2021.1935579\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Politics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1935579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1935579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

政党与民间社会,特别是工会之间关系的不断削弱,一直是大量研究的主题。然而,政党对劳工问题的纲领性重视程度却不尽相同。本文旨在通过定量和定性的方法探讨不同党派家庭与劳动力的关系。首先,MARPOR/比较宣言项目的数据用于比较不同政党家庭中劳动力的相对突出程度,从而使我们能够分析一段时间内和不同国家的趋势。其次,我们关注危机前后的南欧,对中左翼政党对工党的立场进行定性分析。研究结果表明,劳工问题在当代政党纲领中不那么突出,而且在过去几十年中,主流左翼将这一竞争层面非政治化。政党和工会之间的历史联系、中间偏左政党的意识形态遗产和选举压力是解释政党对劳工立场变化的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Labour and left-wing parties’ programmatic orientations: salience, valence and the impact of the Great Recession
ABSTRACT The steady weakening of the relationship between parties and civil society, in particular trade unions, has been the subject of considerable research. The same cannot be said, however, of the programmatic salience assigned by political parties to labour issues. This paper aims to explore how different party families relate to labour through a quantitative and qualitative approach. First, data from the MARPOR/Comparative Manifestos Project is used to compare the relative salience of labour in distinct party families, thus allowing us to analyse trends over time and across countries. Second, we focus on Southern Europe, before and after the crisis, to conduct a qualitative analysis of left-of-centre party positions toward labour. The findings suggest that labour issues are less salient in contemporary party platforms and that the mainstream left depoliticised this dimension of competition over the last decades. The historical links between parties and trade unions, the ideological legacies of left-of-centre parties and electoral pressures are the main factors that explain variations of party positions toward labour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Politics and Society
European Politics and Society Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The editors of European Politics and Society welcome the submission of high quality articles on all aspects of European Politics, widely defined to include, comparative politics, political sociology, social policy, international relations, security, and modern history. The geographical scope of the journal covers all parts of Europe including the Russian Federation. The Journal also welcomes proposals for special thematic issues. For further guidelines on submission of special issue proposals, please see the Instructions for Authors page. All articles will be subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process by a minimum of two referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信