会计战略选择的决定因素:“实证会计理论与制度理论的理论与实证研究”

SSRN Pub Date : 2021-10-22 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3948221
F. Saci
{"title":"会计战略选择的决定因素:“实证会计理论与制度理论的理论与实证研究”","authors":"F. Saci","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3948221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is devoted to the theoretical and empirical study seeking to explain the choice of accounting strategies made by the Algerian companies in the framework of positive accounting theory (Watts and Zimmerman, 1978) and the institutional theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983). The empirical analysis, using multinomial logistic regression with some specification tests as Wald Test and Ramsey RESET Test, of 50 public and private Algerian companies on the data for year 2010, suggests that accounting strategy is determined by the company’ size, the system of managers’ compensation and legal status.","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The determinants of Accounting Strategy Choices: “A Theoretical and Empirical Study through Positive Accounting Theory and Institutional Theory”\",\"authors\":\"F. Saci\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3948221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is devoted to the theoretical and empirical study seeking to explain the choice of accounting strategies made by the Algerian companies in the framework of positive accounting theory (Watts and Zimmerman, 1978) and the institutional theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983). The empirical analysis, using multinomial logistic regression with some specification tests as Wald Test and Ramsey RESET Test, of 50 public and private Algerian companies on the data for year 2010, suggests that accounting strategy is determined by the company’ size, the system of managers’ compensation and legal status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSRN\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSRN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3948221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3948221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于理论和实证研究,试图在实证会计理论(Watts和Zimmerman,1978)和制度理论(DiMaggio和Powell,1983)的框架下解释阿尔及利亚公司的会计策略选择。对阿尔及利亚50家公共和私营公司2010年的数据进行了多项逻辑回归和Wald检验和Ramsey RESET检验,实证分析表明,会计策略是由公司规模、经理薪酬制度和法律地位决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The determinants of Accounting Strategy Choices: “A Theoretical and Empirical Study through Positive Accounting Theory and Institutional Theory”
This paper is devoted to the theoretical and empirical study seeking to explain the choice of accounting strategies made by the Algerian companies in the framework of positive accounting theory (Watts and Zimmerman, 1978) and the institutional theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983). The empirical analysis, using multinomial logistic regression with some specification tests as Wald Test and Ramsey RESET Test, of 50 public and private Algerian companies on the data for year 2010, suggests that accounting strategy is determined by the company’ size, the system of managers’ compensation and legal status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信