商品硬南瓜品种对疫霉腐病的敏感性差异

IF 1.7 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
David E. Perla, Z. Hayden, M. Hausbeck
{"title":"商品硬南瓜品种对疫霉腐病的敏感性差异","authors":"David E. Perla, Z. Hayden, M. Hausbeck","doi":"10.1094/php-01-23-0009-rs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crown rot and fruit rot, caused by the oomycete Phytophthora capsici, limit yield and quality of hard squash grown for processing. In a two-year field study, we compared four Butternut types (Cucurbita moschata), two Delicious varietal Hubbard types (Cucurbita maxima), and six Kabocha types (C. maxima) for crown rot resistance, and fruit characteristics relevant to processing including mesocarp soluble solids, percent dry matter, and average fruit weight in 2019 and 2020. To evaluate crown rot, plants were inoculated in replicated field trials. The C. moschata cultivars ‘Dickinson’, ‘Buckskin’, ‘New England Cheddar’, and ‘Ultra Butternut’ had significantly less plant death for both years (<15%) than other cultivars. Significantly fewer 'Thunder' plants died in 2020 (59.6%) compared to the Kabocha cultivars 'Sweet Mama' (>94.2%), 'Delica' (>92.3%), and 'Sunshine' (>90.4%) and had a lower rAUDPC value (≤22.4) in both years. In non-inoculated field trials, mature fruits were assessed for fruit characteristics. Of the resistant C. moschata cultivars, only ‘Ultra Butternut’ exhibited similar °Brix than ‘NK 580’ in both years and had comparable or greater dry matter and fruit weight. Kabocha cultivars with moderate crown rot susceptibility (i.e., ‘Thunder’) exhibited higher °Brix and dry matter and smaller fruit weight compared to ‘NK 580’ each year. Integrated management programs can be advanced by selecting cultivars with crown rot resistance. Further evaluation of desirable yield and quality characteristics of the resistant cultivars could accelerate acceptance of these cultivars by growers and processors.","PeriodicalId":20251,"journal":{"name":"Plant Health Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial Hard Squash Cultivars Exhibit Differences in Susceptibility to Phytophthora Crown Rot\",\"authors\":\"David E. Perla, Z. Hayden, M. Hausbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/php-01-23-0009-rs\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Crown rot and fruit rot, caused by the oomycete Phytophthora capsici, limit yield and quality of hard squash grown for processing. In a two-year field study, we compared four Butternut types (Cucurbita moschata), two Delicious varietal Hubbard types (Cucurbita maxima), and six Kabocha types (C. maxima) for crown rot resistance, and fruit characteristics relevant to processing including mesocarp soluble solids, percent dry matter, and average fruit weight in 2019 and 2020. To evaluate crown rot, plants were inoculated in replicated field trials. The C. moschata cultivars ‘Dickinson’, ‘Buckskin’, ‘New England Cheddar’, and ‘Ultra Butternut’ had significantly less plant death for both years (<15%) than other cultivars. Significantly fewer 'Thunder' plants died in 2020 (59.6%) compared to the Kabocha cultivars 'Sweet Mama' (>94.2%), 'Delica' (>92.3%), and 'Sunshine' (>90.4%) and had a lower rAUDPC value (≤22.4) in both years. In non-inoculated field trials, mature fruits were assessed for fruit characteristics. Of the resistant C. moschata cultivars, only ‘Ultra Butternut’ exhibited similar °Brix than ‘NK 580’ in both years and had comparable or greater dry matter and fruit weight. Kabocha cultivars with moderate crown rot susceptibility (i.e., ‘Thunder’) exhibited higher °Brix and dry matter and smaller fruit weight compared to ‘NK 580’ each year. Integrated management programs can be advanced by selecting cultivars with crown rot resistance. Further evaluation of desirable yield and quality characteristics of the resistant cultivars could accelerate acceptance of these cultivars by growers and processors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Health Progress\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Health Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1094/php-01-23-0009-rs\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Health Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/php-01-23-0009-rs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辣椒疫霉菌引起的冠腐病和果腐病限制了加工用硬南瓜的产量和质量。在一项为期两年的实地研究中,我们比较了四种Butternut类型(Cucurbita moschata)、两种美味品种Hubbard类型(Cuurbita maxima)和六种Kabocha类型(C.maxima。为了评估冠腐病,在重复的田间试验中接种植物。moschata品种“Dickinson”、“Buckskin”、“New England Cheddar”和“Ultra Butternut”的植物死亡率在两年内都显著降低(94.2%),“Delica”(>92.3%)和“Sunshine”(>90.4%),rAUDPC值在两年内均较低(≤22.4)。在未接种的田间试验中,对成熟果实的果实特性进行了评估。在抗性C.moschata品种中,只有“Ultra Butternut”在这两年中表现出与“NK 580”相似的°Brix,并且具有相当或更大的干物质和果实重量。与每年的“NK 580”相比,具有中等冠腐敏感性的Kabocha品种(即“Thunder”)表现出更高的白利糖度和干物质,以及更小的果实重量。可以通过选择具有抗冠腐病能力的品种来推进综合管理计划。进一步评估抗性品种的理想产量和质量特征可以加速种植者和加工商对这些品种的接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commercial Hard Squash Cultivars Exhibit Differences in Susceptibility to Phytophthora Crown Rot
Crown rot and fruit rot, caused by the oomycete Phytophthora capsici, limit yield and quality of hard squash grown for processing. In a two-year field study, we compared four Butternut types (Cucurbita moschata), two Delicious varietal Hubbard types (Cucurbita maxima), and six Kabocha types (C. maxima) for crown rot resistance, and fruit characteristics relevant to processing including mesocarp soluble solids, percent dry matter, and average fruit weight in 2019 and 2020. To evaluate crown rot, plants were inoculated in replicated field trials. The C. moschata cultivars ‘Dickinson’, ‘Buckskin’, ‘New England Cheddar’, and ‘Ultra Butternut’ had significantly less plant death for both years (<15%) than other cultivars. Significantly fewer 'Thunder' plants died in 2020 (59.6%) compared to the Kabocha cultivars 'Sweet Mama' (>94.2%), 'Delica' (>92.3%), and 'Sunshine' (>90.4%) and had a lower rAUDPC value (≤22.4) in both years. In non-inoculated field trials, mature fruits were assessed for fruit characteristics. Of the resistant C. moschata cultivars, only ‘Ultra Butternut’ exhibited similar °Brix than ‘NK 580’ in both years and had comparable or greater dry matter and fruit weight. Kabocha cultivars with moderate crown rot susceptibility (i.e., ‘Thunder’) exhibited higher °Brix and dry matter and smaller fruit weight compared to ‘NK 580’ each year. Integrated management programs can be advanced by selecting cultivars with crown rot resistance. Further evaluation of desirable yield and quality characteristics of the resistant cultivars could accelerate acceptance of these cultivars by growers and processors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Health Progress
Plant Health Progress Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Plant Health Progress, a member journal of the Plant Management Network, is a multidisciplinary science-based journal covering all aspects of applied plant health management in agriculture and horticulture. Both peer-reviewed and fully citable, the journal is a credible online-only publication. Plant Health Progress is a not-for-profit collaborative endeavor of the plant health community at large, serving practitioners worldwide. Its primary goal is to provide a comprehensive one-stop Internet resource for plant health information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信