历史的内在性与新的问题——论季尔吉·卢卡奇的“必要的亚时主义”

IF 0.2 4区文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM

DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM Pub Date : 2021-07-08 DOI:10.1353/dia.2020.0008

Roberto M. Dainotto

{"title":"历史的内在性与新的问题——论季尔吉·卢卡奇的“必要的亚时主义”","authors":"Roberto M. Dainotto","doi":"10.1353/dia.2020.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The essay discusses Rancière's \"The Concept of Anachronism\" by placing it in the context of Althusser's critique of historicism and historical immanence. While this critique builds on the assumption that all theories of immanence are inherently conservative, if not altogether fascistic, the essay argues instead for the profoundly revolutionary character of György Lukács's concept of historical immanence.","PeriodicalId":46840,"journal":{"name":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","volume":"48 1","pages":"18 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/dia.2020.0008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Immanence and the Problem of the New: On the \\\"Necessary Anachronism\\\" of György Lukács\",\"authors\":\"Roberto M. Dainotto\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/dia.2020.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The essay discusses Rancière's \\\"The Concept of Anachronism\\\" by placing it in the context of Althusser's critique of historicism and historical immanence. While this critique builds on the assumption that all theories of immanence are inherently conservative, if not altogether fascistic, the essay argues instead for the profoundly revolutionary character of György Lukács's concept of historical immanence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"18 - 35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/dia.2020.0008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2020.0008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2020.0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要：本文将兰齐埃的“时间主义概念”置于阿尔都塞对历史主义和历史内在性的批判语境中加以论述。虽然这一批评建立在这样一个假设之上，即所有的内在性理论都是固有的保守主义，如果不是完全的法西斯主义的话，但这篇文章反而论证了György Lukács的历史内在性概念的深刻革命性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Historical Immanence and the Problem of the New: On the "Necessary Anachronism" of György Lukács

Abstract:The essay discusses Rancière's "The Concept of Anachronism" by placing it in the context of Althusser's critique of historicism and historical immanence. While this critique builds on the assumption that all theories of immanence are inherently conservative, if not altogether fascistic, the essay argues instead for the profoundly revolutionary character of György Lukács's concept of historical immanence.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： For over thirty years, diacritics has been an exceptional and influential forum for scholars writing on the problems of literary criticism. Each issue features articles in which contributors compare and analyze books on particular theoretical works and develop their own positions on the theses, methods, and theoretical implications of those works.