法律决策中的启发式

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Thomas Hoffmann
{"title":"法律决策中的启发式","authors":"Thomas Hoffmann","doi":"10.11590/abhps.2020.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of algorithm-based decisions, generated in the “black boxes” of deep learning ensembles and their controversially discussed ethical and legal implications, the fact that human legal decision-making is to a large degree not based on rational choices, and thus also neither deducible nor predictable, tends to be neglected in legal discussion. this article intends to provide an overview on heuristic patterns in human legal decision-making by pointing out their flaws and benefits, and also provides some advice on how to hedge its risks in legal practice.","PeriodicalId":37693,"journal":{"name":"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum","volume":"8 1","pages":"62-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heuristics in Legal Decision-Making\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.11590/abhps.2020.1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advent of algorithm-based decisions, generated in the “black boxes” of deep learning ensembles and their controversially discussed ethical and legal implications, the fact that human legal decision-making is to a large degree not based on rational choices, and thus also neither deducible nor predictable, tends to be neglected in legal discussion. this article intends to provide an overview on heuristic patterns in human legal decision-making by pointing out their flaws and benefits, and also provides some advice on how to hedge its risks in legal practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"62-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.1.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着基于算法的决策的出现,这些决策是在深度学习系统的“黑盒子”中生成的,它们对伦理和法律的影响引起了争议,人类的法律决策在很大程度上不是基于理性选择,因此既不可演绎也不可预测,这一事实往往在法律讨论中被忽视。本文对人类法律决策中的启发式模式进行了概述,指出了启发式模式的缺陷和优点,并对在法律实践中如何规避启发式模式的风险提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heuristics in Legal Decision-Making
With the advent of algorithm-based decisions, generated in the “black boxes” of deep learning ensembles and their controversially discussed ethical and legal implications, the fact that human legal decision-making is to a large degree not based on rational choices, and thus also neither deducible nor predictable, tends to be neglected in legal discussion. this article intends to provide an overview on heuristic patterns in human legal decision-making by pointing out their flaws and benefits, and also provides some advice on how to hedge its risks in legal practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum sees its mission in offering publishing opportunities for Baltic and non-Baltic scholars in the field of the history and philosophy of natural and social sciences (including legal studies) to promote and further international cooperation between scholars of different countries in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信