新地缘政治条件下的北极科学外交:从“软”实力到“硬”对话?

IF 1.4 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY

Polar Record Pub Date : 2023-07-19 DOI:10.1017/S0032247423000141

Y. Zaika, M. Lagutina

{"title":"新地缘政治条件下的北极科学外交:从“软”实力到“硬”对话?","authors":"Y. Zaika, M. Lagutina","doi":"10.1017/S0032247423000141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent years have shown that international science dialogue exists at the edge of turbulence and is disturbed by different geopolitical events. The notion of science diplomacy has taken the critical discourse to different levels of actors. Such a discourse exposes the epistemological ambivalence and methodological imbalance of both science and diplomacy in this phenomenon. Current geopolitical conditions have revealed new edges of science diplomacy instruments that spread from “soft” to “hard” practices. Different levels of dialogue and cooperation have shown different examples of resilience and adaptability (or the opposite) to the external turbulence. The phenomenon of regionalisation in science diplomacy is facing criticism from the science community while the current geopolitical situation has dramatically influenced the Arctic science dialogue, as well as governance practices. This commentary discusses particular examples of existing Arctic science diplomacy practices in current geopolitical conditions which are reflected in the Arctic theoretical and practical discourse.","PeriodicalId":49685,"journal":{"name":"Polar Record","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?\",\"authors\":\"Y. Zaika, M. Lagutina\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0032247423000141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Recent years have shown that international science dialogue exists at the edge of turbulence and is disturbed by different geopolitical events. The notion of science diplomacy has taken the critical discourse to different levels of actors. Such a discourse exposes the epistemological ambivalence and methodological imbalance of both science and diplomacy in this phenomenon. Current geopolitical conditions have revealed new edges of science diplomacy instruments that spread from “soft” to “hard” practices. Different levels of dialogue and cooperation have shown different examples of resilience and adaptability (or the opposite) to the external turbulence. The phenomenon of regionalisation in science diplomacy is facing criticism from the science community while the current geopolitical situation has dramatically influenced the Arctic science dialogue, as well as governance practices. This commentary discusses particular examples of existing Arctic science diplomacy practices in current geopolitical conditions which are reflected in the Arctic theoretical and practical discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar Record\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247423000141\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Record","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247423000141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要近年来，国际科学对话处于动荡的边缘，受到不同地缘政治事件的干扰。科学外交的概念已经将批判性话语带到了不同层面的行动者。这样的话语暴露了这一现象中科学与外交的认识论矛盾和方法论失衡。当前的地缘政治条件揭示了科学外交工具从“软”到“硬”的新边缘。不同级别的对话与合作展示了对外部动荡的韧性和适应性（或相反）的不同例子。科学外交中的区域化现象正面临科学界的批评，而当前的地缘政治局势极大地影响了北极科学对话和治理实践。这篇评论讨论了当前地缘政治条件下现有北极科学外交实践的具体例子，这些例子反映在北极理论和实践话语中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Arctic science diplomacy in new geopolitical conditions: From “soft” power to “hard” dialogue?

Abstract Recent years have shown that international science dialogue exists at the edge of turbulence and is disturbed by different geopolitical events. The notion of science diplomacy has taken the critical discourse to different levels of actors. Such a discourse exposes the epistemological ambivalence and methodological imbalance of both science and diplomacy in this phenomenon. Current geopolitical conditions have revealed new edges of science diplomacy instruments that spread from “soft” to “hard” practices. Different levels of dialogue and cooperation have shown different examples of resilience and adaptability (or the opposite) to the external turbulence. The phenomenon of regionalisation in science diplomacy is facing criticism from the science community while the current geopolitical situation has dramatically influenced the Arctic science dialogue, as well as governance practices. This commentary discusses particular examples of existing Arctic science diplomacy practices in current geopolitical conditions which are reflected in the Arctic theoretical and practical discourse.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Polar Record 环境科学-环境科学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

25.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>36 weeks

期刊介绍： Polar Record is an international, peer-reviewed scholarly periodical publishing results from a wide range of polar research areas. The journal covers original primary research papers in the humanities, social sciences, physical sciences, life sciences, and polar technology, as well as papers concerning current political, economic, legal, and environmental issues in the Arctic or Antarctic. Polar Record endeavours to provide rapid publication, normally within nine months of initial submission.