精神分析遭遇:冲突与变革——第29届IFPS论坛论文,2020年2月,里斯本

IF 0.9 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS
M. Conci, G. Maniadakis
{"title":"精神分析遭遇:冲突与变革——第29届IFPS论坛论文,2020年2月,里斯本","authors":"M. Conci, G. Maniadakis","doi":"10.1080/0803706X.2022.2093082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The papers we have put together in this issue represent the selection that our Editorial Board made of the many papers presented at the XXIst IFPS Forum held in Lisbon on February 5–8, 2020, about which one of us wrote the report published in No. 2 of Vol. 29 of this journal (Conci, 2020). Writing now, with the pandemics not fully behind us and the war in the Ukraine accompanying our daily life, we can only hope to be lucky enough to be able to meet next October 19–22 in Madrid, for the XXIInd IFPS Forum, organized by the Centro Psicoanalìtico deMadrid under the title “Psychoanalytic Theories and Techniques: Dialogue, Difficulties and Future. 60 Anniversary of the IFPS.” Of the eight papers of this issue, three come from Portugal, three from the USA, Brazil and Italy, and the last two –which were not presented in Lisbon – from Iran and from Israel. One of the best and most appreciated papers given in Lisbon was Sandra Buechler’s paper “King Lear and the challenge of retirement,” dealing as it does with a question that most of us experience as rather embarrassing, problematic, if not wholly impossible to deal with. But Sandra was courageous enough to be able to draw a line and retire from working with patients, on May 31, 2019 – the day before she turned 73. This allowed her to formulate a series of thoughtful considerations on how such a decision impacts our personal identity, and on how we can survive living without the structuring – and reassuring – routine of our analytic work. Of course, Sandra was helped in such a difficult transition by her passion for writing, which allowed her to publish her seventh book, Poetic dialogues, in the fall of 2021 (Buechler, 2021). Her first book, Clinical values: Emotions that guide psychoanalytic treatment (Buechler, 2004), was reviewed by one of us in this journal (Conci, 2006). Sandra Buechler is not only one of the most productive colleagues of the W.A. White Institute of her generation, but also the one who has most actively participated in the life of our Federation since the time in which Gerard Chrzanowski and Buechler’s own analyst, Rose Spiegel, contributed so greatly in linking their society to the IFPS (see Conci, 2021). A similar function has also been played by Jô Gondar, a Brazilian colleague and a member of the Circulo Psicoanalitico de Rio de Janeiro, a member society of the IFPS since 1980; for many years it was represented on the Executive Committee by Edson Lannes – who had trained in the 1960s with Katrin Kemper, a German pioneer of the Brazilian IPA and IFPS psychoanalysis. In her paper “‘To hear with eyes’: Gestures, expressions, rhythms,” the author borrows a Shakespearean expression used by Masud Kahn in The privacy of the self (1974), to show how his eyes could detect inscribed in the body of a patient lying on his couch different things from the ones he was hearing from the patient. Referring also to Sándor Ferenczi’s Clinical diary (Ferenczi, 1988), Jô Gondar shows how important it is to pay attention to the nonverbal aspects and to the rhythm of each patient, a dimension of our work that becomes particularly important when we work with patients suffering from traumatic experiences beyond verbal formulation. In such a case – and here the author refers also to Haag, Maiello, and Roussilion – we can even speak of psychic suffering as “a rhythmic disturbance, a dysrhythmia.” The chair of the organizing committee of the 2018 IFPS Forum, Anna Maria Loiacono, presented in Lisbon her own clinical work with a female patient through the paper “Countertransference and Oedipal love.” This is centered around the famous paper that Harold Searles wrote on this subject (Searles, 1959) and around Thomas Ogden’s revisitation of it (Ogden, 2007). The “mature relatedness” that Searles offers as a model of treatment consists in accepting the paradoxical character of the Oedipal dimension in the treatment, that is, its being at the same time both real and imaginary. In the light of her treatment of Mrs. K., the author shows how “there exists a direct proportional relationship","PeriodicalId":43212,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychoanalytic encounter: Conflict and change – Papers from the XXIst IFPS Forum, February 2020, Lisbon\",\"authors\":\"M. Conci, G. Maniadakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0803706X.2022.2093082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The papers we have put together in this issue represent the selection that our Editorial Board made of the many papers presented at the XXIst IFPS Forum held in Lisbon on February 5–8, 2020, about which one of us wrote the report published in No. 2 of Vol. 29 of this journal (Conci, 2020). Writing now, with the pandemics not fully behind us and the war in the Ukraine accompanying our daily life, we can only hope to be lucky enough to be able to meet next October 19–22 in Madrid, for the XXIInd IFPS Forum, organized by the Centro Psicoanalìtico deMadrid under the title “Psychoanalytic Theories and Techniques: Dialogue, Difficulties and Future. 60 Anniversary of the IFPS.” Of the eight papers of this issue, three come from Portugal, three from the USA, Brazil and Italy, and the last two –which were not presented in Lisbon – from Iran and from Israel. One of the best and most appreciated papers given in Lisbon was Sandra Buechler’s paper “King Lear and the challenge of retirement,” dealing as it does with a question that most of us experience as rather embarrassing, problematic, if not wholly impossible to deal with. But Sandra was courageous enough to be able to draw a line and retire from working with patients, on May 31, 2019 – the day before she turned 73. This allowed her to formulate a series of thoughtful considerations on how such a decision impacts our personal identity, and on how we can survive living without the structuring – and reassuring – routine of our analytic work. Of course, Sandra was helped in such a difficult transition by her passion for writing, which allowed her to publish her seventh book, Poetic dialogues, in the fall of 2021 (Buechler, 2021). Her first book, Clinical values: Emotions that guide psychoanalytic treatment (Buechler, 2004), was reviewed by one of us in this journal (Conci, 2006). Sandra Buechler is not only one of the most productive colleagues of the W.A. White Institute of her generation, but also the one who has most actively participated in the life of our Federation since the time in which Gerard Chrzanowski and Buechler’s own analyst, Rose Spiegel, contributed so greatly in linking their society to the IFPS (see Conci, 2021). A similar function has also been played by Jô Gondar, a Brazilian colleague and a member of the Circulo Psicoanalitico de Rio de Janeiro, a member society of the IFPS since 1980; for many years it was represented on the Executive Committee by Edson Lannes – who had trained in the 1960s with Katrin Kemper, a German pioneer of the Brazilian IPA and IFPS psychoanalysis. In her paper “‘To hear with eyes’: Gestures, expressions, rhythms,” the author borrows a Shakespearean expression used by Masud Kahn in The privacy of the self (1974), to show how his eyes could detect inscribed in the body of a patient lying on his couch different things from the ones he was hearing from the patient. Referring also to Sándor Ferenczi’s Clinical diary (Ferenczi, 1988), Jô Gondar shows how important it is to pay attention to the nonverbal aspects and to the rhythm of each patient, a dimension of our work that becomes particularly important when we work with patients suffering from traumatic experiences beyond verbal formulation. In such a case – and here the author refers also to Haag, Maiello, and Roussilion – we can even speak of psychic suffering as “a rhythmic disturbance, a dysrhythmia.” The chair of the organizing committee of the 2018 IFPS Forum, Anna Maria Loiacono, presented in Lisbon her own clinical work with a female patient through the paper “Countertransference and Oedipal love.” This is centered around the famous paper that Harold Searles wrote on this subject (Searles, 1959) and around Thomas Ogden’s revisitation of it (Ogden, 2007). The “mature relatedness” that Searles offers as a model of treatment consists in accepting the paradoxical character of the Oedipal dimension in the treatment, that is, its being at the same time both real and imaginary. In the light of her treatment of Mrs. K., the author shows how “there exists a direct proportional relationship\",\"PeriodicalId\":43212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Forum of Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Forum of Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2022.2093082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2022.2093082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在本期中整理的论文代表了我们的编辑委员会对2020年2月5日至8日在里斯本举行的第二十九届IFPS论坛上发表的许多论文的选择,我们中的一人撰写了发表在本杂志第29卷第2期的报告(Conci,2020)。现在,随着流行病尚未完全过去,乌克兰战争伴随着我们的日常生活,我们只能希望有幸于明年10月19日至22日在马德里举行由马德里精神分析中心组织的第二十二届国际精神分析论坛,题为“精神分析理论和技术:对话、困难和未来。国际精神分析大会60周年”。“在本期的八篇论文中,三篇来自葡萄牙,三篇出自美国、巴西和意大利,最后两篇——没有在里斯本发表——来自伊朗和以色列。在里斯本发表的最好、最受赞赏的论文之一是Sandra Buechler的论文《李尔王与退休的挑战》,它处理了一个我们大多数人都觉得相当尴尬、有问题甚至完全不可能处理的问题。但桑德拉足够勇敢,能够在2019年5月31日,也就是她73岁的前一天,划清界限,从与患者的合作中退休。这使她能够就这样的决定如何影响我们的个人身份,以及我们如何在没有结构化和令人放心的日常分析工作的情况下生存下来,提出一系列深思熟虑的考虑。当然,桑德拉在如此艰难的转变中得到了写作热情的帮助,这使她在2021年秋天出版了第七本书《诗意对话》(Buechler,2021)。她的第一本书《临床价值观:指导精神分析治疗的情绪》(Buechler,2004)由我们中的一位在本杂志上进行了评论(Conci,2006)。Sandra Buechler不仅是她那一代W.A.White研究所最富有成效的同事之一,也是自Gerard Chrzanowski和Buechler自己的分析师Rose Spiegel在将他们的社会与IFPS联系起来方面做出巨大贡献以来,最积极参与我们联邦生活的人(见Conci,2021)。JôGondar也发挥了类似的作用,他是一位巴西同事,也是1980年以来一直是IFPS成员协会的里约热内卢精神病院的成员;多年来,它在执行委员会的代表是Edson Lannes,他在20世纪60年代接受了巴西IPA和IFPS精神分析的德国先驱Katrin Kemper的培训。在她的论文《用眼睛听:手势、表情、节奏》中,作者借用了马苏德·卡恩在《自我的隐私》(1974)中使用的莎士比亚式表达,展示了他的眼睛如何检测到躺在沙发上的病人身上刻着的与他从病人身上听到的不同的东西。还参考了Sándor Ferenczi的临床日记(Ferenczi,1988),JôGondar展示了关注非语言方面和每个患者的节奏是多么重要,当我们与遭受言语表述之外的创伤经历的患者合作时,我们工作的这一方面变得尤为重要。在这种情况下——在这里,作者还提到了Haag、Maiello和Roussilion——我们甚至可以将心理痛苦称为“一种节律紊乱,一种节律失常”。2018年IFPS论坛组委会主席Anna Maria Loiacono在里斯本通过论文《反移情与俄狄浦尔之爱》介绍了她自己与一名女性患者的临床工作。“这是围绕哈罗德·西尔斯写的关于这个主题的著名论文(西尔斯,1959年)和托马斯·奥格登对它的重新审视(奥格登,2007年)展开的。西尔斯作为一种治疗模式所提供的“成熟的关联性”在于接受治疗中俄狄浦斯维度的矛盾性,即它同时存在于真实和想象中。根据她对待K夫人的态度,作者展示了“存在着直接的比例关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychoanalytic encounter: Conflict and change – Papers from the XXIst IFPS Forum, February 2020, Lisbon
The papers we have put together in this issue represent the selection that our Editorial Board made of the many papers presented at the XXIst IFPS Forum held in Lisbon on February 5–8, 2020, about which one of us wrote the report published in No. 2 of Vol. 29 of this journal (Conci, 2020). Writing now, with the pandemics not fully behind us and the war in the Ukraine accompanying our daily life, we can only hope to be lucky enough to be able to meet next October 19–22 in Madrid, for the XXIInd IFPS Forum, organized by the Centro Psicoanalìtico deMadrid under the title “Psychoanalytic Theories and Techniques: Dialogue, Difficulties and Future. 60 Anniversary of the IFPS.” Of the eight papers of this issue, three come from Portugal, three from the USA, Brazil and Italy, and the last two –which were not presented in Lisbon – from Iran and from Israel. One of the best and most appreciated papers given in Lisbon was Sandra Buechler’s paper “King Lear and the challenge of retirement,” dealing as it does with a question that most of us experience as rather embarrassing, problematic, if not wholly impossible to deal with. But Sandra was courageous enough to be able to draw a line and retire from working with patients, on May 31, 2019 – the day before she turned 73. This allowed her to formulate a series of thoughtful considerations on how such a decision impacts our personal identity, and on how we can survive living without the structuring – and reassuring – routine of our analytic work. Of course, Sandra was helped in such a difficult transition by her passion for writing, which allowed her to publish her seventh book, Poetic dialogues, in the fall of 2021 (Buechler, 2021). Her first book, Clinical values: Emotions that guide psychoanalytic treatment (Buechler, 2004), was reviewed by one of us in this journal (Conci, 2006). Sandra Buechler is not only one of the most productive colleagues of the W.A. White Institute of her generation, but also the one who has most actively participated in the life of our Federation since the time in which Gerard Chrzanowski and Buechler’s own analyst, Rose Spiegel, contributed so greatly in linking their society to the IFPS (see Conci, 2021). A similar function has also been played by Jô Gondar, a Brazilian colleague and a member of the Circulo Psicoanalitico de Rio de Janeiro, a member society of the IFPS since 1980; for many years it was represented on the Executive Committee by Edson Lannes – who had trained in the 1960s with Katrin Kemper, a German pioneer of the Brazilian IPA and IFPS psychoanalysis. In her paper “‘To hear with eyes’: Gestures, expressions, rhythms,” the author borrows a Shakespearean expression used by Masud Kahn in The privacy of the self (1974), to show how his eyes could detect inscribed in the body of a patient lying on his couch different things from the ones he was hearing from the patient. Referring also to Sándor Ferenczi’s Clinical diary (Ferenczi, 1988), Jô Gondar shows how important it is to pay attention to the nonverbal aspects and to the rhythm of each patient, a dimension of our work that becomes particularly important when we work with patients suffering from traumatic experiences beyond verbal formulation. In such a case – and here the author refers also to Haag, Maiello, and Roussilion – we can even speak of psychic suffering as “a rhythmic disturbance, a dysrhythmia.” The chair of the organizing committee of the 2018 IFPS Forum, Anna Maria Loiacono, presented in Lisbon her own clinical work with a female patient through the paper “Countertransference and Oedipal love.” This is centered around the famous paper that Harold Searles wrote on this subject (Searles, 1959) and around Thomas Ogden’s revisitation of it (Ogden, 2007). The “mature relatedness” that Searles offers as a model of treatment consists in accepting the paradoxical character of the Oedipal dimension in the treatment, that is, its being at the same time both real and imaginary. In the light of her treatment of Mrs. K., the author shows how “there exists a direct proportional relationship
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Forum of Psychoanalysis
International Forum of Psychoanalysis PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信