特奥运动员的平衡和力量评估:Fun Fitness测试电池的可行性和可靠性如何?

Q3 Social Sciences
Debbie van Biesen, R. C. Pineda
{"title":"特奥运动员的平衡和力量评估:Fun Fitness测试电池的可行性和可靠性如何?","authors":"Debbie van Biesen, R. C. Pineda","doi":"10.5507/EUJ.2019.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the test-retest reliability and feasibility of four muscle strength and three balance tests included in the Special Olympics (SO) FUNfitness test battery. The test is used worldwide to assess physical fitness of SO athletes with intellectual disabilities (ID). A sample of 36 Belgian participants with ID (22 men, 14 women) aged 8–30 years, completed a battery of seven tests twice within a two-week time interval. We assessed test-retest reliability by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman plots. All tests demonstrated good feasibility and relative and absolute reliability. The ICC ranged between 0.75 and 0.89. All SEM values demonstrated acceptable measurement precision (SEM<SD/2). The scatter around the Bland-Altman plots were randomly distributed. Despite the promising findings, further research is recommended to determine whether these balance and strength tests are also reliable in less standardized environments such as the SO testing-area.","PeriodicalId":37918,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balance and strength assessment of Special Olympics athletes: how feasible and reliable is the Fun Fitness test battery?\",\"authors\":\"Debbie van Biesen, R. C. Pineda\",\"doi\":\"10.5507/EUJ.2019.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the test-retest reliability and feasibility of four muscle strength and three balance tests included in the Special Olympics (SO) FUNfitness test battery. The test is used worldwide to assess physical fitness of SO athletes with intellectual disabilities (ID). A sample of 36 Belgian participants with ID (22 men, 14 women) aged 8–30 years, completed a battery of seven tests twice within a two-week time interval. We assessed test-retest reliability by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman plots. All tests demonstrated good feasibility and relative and absolute reliability. The ICC ranged between 0.75 and 0.89. All SEM values demonstrated acceptable measurement precision (SEM<SD/2). The scatter around the Bland-Altman plots were randomly distributed. Despite the promising findings, further research is recommended to determine whether these balance and strength tests are also reliable in less standardized environments such as the SO testing-area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5507/EUJ.2019.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/EUJ.2019.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本研究考察了特奥FUNfitness测试组中四项肌肉力量和三项平衡测试的重新测试可靠性和可行性。该测试在世界范围内用于评估SO智力残疾运动员的身体素质。36名年龄在8-30岁的比利时ID参与者(22名男性,14名女性)在两周内完成了两次七项测试。我们通过组内相关系数(ICC)、标准测量误差(SEM)和Bland-Altman图来评估重测的可靠性。所有测试都证明了良好的可行性以及相对和绝对的可靠性。ICC介于0.75和0.89之间。所有SEM值均显示出可接受的测量精度(SEM本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文 本刊更多论文
Balance and strength assessment of Special Olympics athletes: how feasible and reliable is the Fun Fitness test battery?
This study examined the test-retest reliability and feasibility of four muscle strength and three balance tests included in the Special Olympics (SO) FUNfitness test battery. The test is used worldwide to assess physical fitness of SO athletes with intellectual disabilities (ID). A sample of 36 Belgian participants with ID (22 men, 14 women) aged 8–30 years, completed a battery of seven tests twice within a two-week time interval. We assessed test-retest reliability by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and Bland-Altman plots. All tests demonstrated good feasibility and relative and absolute reliability. The ICC ranged between 0.75 and 0.89. All SEM values demonstrated acceptable measurement precision (SEM
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity (EUJAPA) is an international, multidisciplinary journal, introduced to communicate, share and stimulate academic inquiry focusing on physical activity of persons with special needs. Articles appearing in EUJAPA reflect cross disciplinary nature of the academic discipline of adapted physical activity ranging from physical education, through sport, recreation, rehabilitation, dance, sport medicine or health care. EUJAPA is the official journal of the European Federation of Adapted Physical Activity. This multidisciplinary journal provides the latest academic inquiry related to physical activity for special populations. Regular features include qualitative and quantitative research studies, case studies, review articles, viewpoints, methodological guidelines, and editorial commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信