建筑病理学意见的技术论证模型

IF 0.4 4区 工程技术 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
L. Gómez-Martinho Palacio, F. Lasheras Merino
{"title":"建筑病理学意见的技术论证模型","authors":"L. Gómez-Martinho Palacio, F. Lasheras Merino","doi":"10.3989/ic.68833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of construction, a technical pathology report is a document where a technical expert in this discipline makes known their technical opinion thereon to a layman who has no real understanding or to another expert with less knowledge. In order for the addressee to trust the technician’s opinion, it’s necessary to appreciate internal consistency and plausibility in the report, among other things. Scientific and technical knowledge, presupposed in the author is not enough because the best technical argumentation can not properly transmit its content. Therefore, it’s possible and necessary to introduce argument criteria, supplementary to purely technical ones, in order to improve transparency and comprehensibility in the report. For this reason, we are presenting a technical argumentation model, developed from others logic argument models, especially Toulmin’s one. It was exposed in 1979 and has been applied in very different fields, but not, unless we know, in building pathology.","PeriodicalId":54981,"journal":{"name":"Informes De La Construccion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelo de argumentación técnica para el dictamen de patología de la edificación\",\"authors\":\"L. Gómez-Martinho Palacio, F. Lasheras Merino\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/ic.68833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the field of construction, a technical pathology report is a document where a technical expert in this discipline makes known their technical opinion thereon to a layman who has no real understanding or to another expert with less knowledge. In order for the addressee to trust the technician’s opinion, it’s necessary to appreciate internal consistency and plausibility in the report, among other things. Scientific and technical knowledge, presupposed in the author is not enough because the best technical argumentation can not properly transmit its content. Therefore, it’s possible and necessary to introduce argument criteria, supplementary to purely technical ones, in order to improve transparency and comprehensibility in the report. For this reason, we are presenting a technical argumentation model, developed from others logic argument models, especially Toulmin’s one. It was exposed in 1979 and has been applied in very different fields, but not, unless we know, in building pathology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informes De La Construccion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informes De La Construccion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.68833\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informes De La Construccion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.68833","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在建筑领域,技术病理报告是本学科的技术专家向没有真正理解的外行人或知识较少的另一位专家表明其技术意见的文件。为了让收件人相信技术人员的意见,有必要了解报告的内部一致性和合理性。科学技术知识,预设在作者是不够的,因为最好的技术论证不能恰当地传递其内容。因此,为了提高报告的透明度和可理解性,在纯技术性标准的基础上引入论证标准是可能的,也是必要的。因此,我们提出了一种技术论证模型,它是从其他逻辑论证模型,特别是图尔敏的逻辑论证模型发展而来的。它于1979年被曝光,并被应用于非常不同的领域,但除非我们知道,否则它不会应用于建筑病理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelo de argumentación técnica para el dictamen de patología de la edificación
In the field of construction, a technical pathology report is a document where a technical expert in this discipline makes known their technical opinion thereon to a layman who has no real understanding or to another expert with less knowledge. In order for the addressee to trust the technician’s opinion, it’s necessary to appreciate internal consistency and plausibility in the report, among other things. Scientific and technical knowledge, presupposed in the author is not enough because the best technical argumentation can not properly transmit its content. Therefore, it’s possible and necessary to introduce argument criteria, supplementary to purely technical ones, in order to improve transparency and comprehensibility in the report. For this reason, we are presenting a technical argumentation model, developed from others logic argument models, especially Toulmin’s one. It was exposed in 1979 and has been applied in very different fields, but not, unless we know, in building pathology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informes De La Construccion
Informes De La Construccion 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1948 by the Instituto Técnico de la Construcción y del Cemento, Informes de la Construcción is a scientific journal issued quarterly. Its articles cover fields such as architecture, engineering, public works, environment, building services, rehabilitation, construction systems, testing techniques, results of research on building components and systems and so forth. Journal"s readership includes architects, engineers and construction companies, as well as researchers and professionals engaging in building construction and public works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信