强调东亚对学习和教育的特殊文化重视

IF 1.8 4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

High Ability Studies Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13598139.2017.1423281

Daniel Patrick Balestrini, H. Stoeger

{"title":"强调东亚对学习和教育的特殊文化重视","authors":"Daniel Patrick Balestrini, H. Stoeger","doi":"10.1080/13598139.2017.1423281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Claims of a special cultural emphasis on learning and education (SCELE) in East Asia versus the West – the United States in particular – are legion in the research literature. The evidence is, however, largely anecdotal, severely geographically limited, or reflects an unrepresentative selection of respondents. We review the evidentiary strategies of earlier studies, situate the assumed SCELE in a theoretical framework, and compare the prevalence of learning and education words in general-interest newswriting samples from across East Asia and the United States (N = 61). Our findings confirm earlier unsubstantiated claims, provide new insight into the strength of the difference, and illustrate a novel means of quantifying the difference in magnitude of SCELE in East Asia in comparison to the United States.","PeriodicalId":46343,"journal":{"name":"High Ability Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"106 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13598139.2017.1423281","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substantiating a special cultural emphasis on learning and education in East Asia\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Patrick Balestrini, H. Stoeger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13598139.2017.1423281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Claims of a special cultural emphasis on learning and education (SCELE) in East Asia versus the West – the United States in particular – are legion in the research literature. The evidence is, however, largely anecdotal, severely geographically limited, or reflects an unrepresentative selection of respondents. We review the evidentiary strategies of earlier studies, situate the assumed SCELE in a theoretical framework, and compare the prevalence of learning and education words in general-interest newswriting samples from across East Asia and the United States (N = 61). Our findings confirm earlier unsubstantiated claims, provide new insight into the strength of the difference, and illustrate a novel means of quantifying the difference in magnitude of SCELE in East Asia in comparison to the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"High Ability Studies\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"106 - 79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13598139.2017.1423281\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"High Ability Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1423281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Ability Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1423281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要东亚与西方（尤其是美国）相比，对学习和教育（SCELE）的文化重视在研究文献中比比皆是。然而，这些证据大多是轶事，地理位置严重受限，或者反映了对受访者的不具代表性的选择。我们回顾了早期研究的证据策略，将假设的SCELE置于理论框架中，并比较了东亚和美国的一般兴趣新闻写作样本中学习和教育词汇的流行率（N=61）。我们的发现证实了早期未经证实的说法，为这种差异的强度提供了新的见解，并说明了一种新的方法来量化东亚与美国相比SCELE的幅度差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Substantiating a special cultural emphasis on learning and education in East Asia

ABSTRACT Claims of a special cultural emphasis on learning and education (SCELE) in East Asia versus the West – the United States in particular – are legion in the research literature. The evidence is, however, largely anecdotal, severely geographically limited, or reflects an unrepresentative selection of respondents. We review the evidentiary strategies of earlier studies, situate the assumed SCELE in a theoretical framework, and compare the prevalence of learning and education words in general-interest newswriting samples from across East Asia and the United States (N = 61). Our findings confirm earlier unsubstantiated claims, provide new insight into the strength of the difference, and illustrate a novel means of quantifying the difference in magnitude of SCELE in East Asia in comparison to the United States.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

High Ability Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： High Ability Studies provides a forum for scholars in a variety of disciplines associated with the development of human abilities to their highest level. It is a medium for the promotion of high ability, whether through the communication of scientific research, theory, or the exchange of practical experience and ideas. The contents of this journal are unique in reflecting concerns and recent developments in this area from childhood and across the whole life span in a variety of contexts. Far from being restricted to the traditional focus on high-level cognitive development, it also presents investigations into all other areas of human endeavour, including sport, technology, the arts, business, management and social relations.