修改我们的基因:神学、科学和“扮演上帝”

IF 1.4 Q2 ETHICS
T. Stammers
{"title":"修改我们的基因:神学、科学和“扮演上帝”","authors":"T. Stammers","doi":"10.1080/20502877.2022.2066828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"omy illustrates how decision-making might proceed based on a specific understanding of the patient’s interests, and would likely not conform with all different accounts of harm. In sum, this is a helpful, engaging, accessible book. It does not provide a complete guide for action, but for those who wish to think more about the meaning of harm, there are many other places to look. Amajor strength of the book is its discussion of a broad range of relevant considerations and arguments, with nuanced and clear analysis. Those who are interested in the subject but lacking background knowledge will benefit from reading this book, although I would recommend that they also read Nudge. For those who are already well-acquainted with nudge theory, and who wish to consider its application to medical ethics, this book is an excellent resource.","PeriodicalId":43760,"journal":{"name":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","volume":"28 1","pages":"191 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modifying Our Genes: Theology, Science and ‘Playing God’\",\"authors\":\"T. Stammers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20502877.2022.2066828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"omy illustrates how decision-making might proceed based on a specific understanding of the patient’s interests, and would likely not conform with all different accounts of harm. In sum, this is a helpful, engaging, accessible book. It does not provide a complete guide for action, but for those who wish to think more about the meaning of harm, there are many other places to look. Amajor strength of the book is its discussion of a broad range of relevant considerations and arguments, with nuanced and clear analysis. Those who are interested in the subject but lacking background knowledge will benefit from reading this book, although I would recommend that they also read Nudge. For those who are already well-acquainted with nudge theory, and who wish to consider its application to medical ethics, this book is an excellent resource.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"191 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2022.2066828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2022.2066828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Omy说明了如何根据对患者利益的具体理解进行决策,并且可能不符合所有不同的伤害描述。总之,这是一本有益的、引人入胜的、通俗易懂的书。它并没有提供一个完整的行动指南,但对于那些希望更多地思考伤害的意义的人来说,还有很多其他的地方可以看。这本书的主要优势在于它对广泛的相关考虑和论点的讨论,以及细致入微和清晰的分析。那些对这个主题感兴趣但缺乏背景知识的人将从这本书中受益,尽管我建议他们也阅读Nudge。对于那些已经非常熟悉轻推理论,并希望考虑其应用于医学伦理学的人来说,这本书是一个很好的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modifying Our Genes: Theology, Science and ‘Playing God’
omy illustrates how decision-making might proceed based on a specific understanding of the patient’s interests, and would likely not conform with all different accounts of harm. In sum, this is a helpful, engaging, accessible book. It does not provide a complete guide for action, but for those who wish to think more about the meaning of harm, there are many other places to look. Amajor strength of the book is its discussion of a broad range of relevant considerations and arguments, with nuanced and clear analysis. Those who are interested in the subject but lacking background knowledge will benefit from reading this book, although I would recommend that they also read Nudge. For those who are already well-acquainted with nudge theory, and who wish to consider its application to medical ethics, this book is an excellent resource.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信