Ciona物种复合体的生态学研究进展

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Biological Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1086/719476
Emmerson R. Wilson, Kieran J. Murphy, R. Wyeth
{"title":"Ciona物种复合体的生态学研究进展","authors":"Emmerson R. Wilson, Kieran J. Murphy, R. Wyeth","doi":"10.1086/719476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The set of four closely related solitary ascidians Ciona spp. were once considered a single cosmopolitan species, Ciona intestinalis, but are now recognized as genetically and morphologically distinct species. The possibility of ecological differences between the species was not widely considered in studies preceding the schism of Ciona spp. Consequently, there may be an over-generalization of the ecology of Ciona spp., with potential implications for the broad range of studies targeting these species, encompassing the evolution, development, genomics, and invasion biology of Ciona spp. We completed a comprehensive review of the ecology of Ciona spp. to establish the similarities and differences between the widely distributed Ciona robusta and C. intestinalis (and what little is known of the two other species, Ciona sp. C and Ciona sp. D). When necessary, we used study locations and the species’ geographic ranges to infer the species in each study in the review. As expected, ecological similarities are the norm between the two species, spanning both abiotic and biotic interactions. However, there are also important differences that have potential implications for other aspects of the biology of Ciona spp. For example, differences in temperature and salinity tolerances likely correspond with the disparities in the geographic distribution of the species. Asymmetries in topics studied in each species diminish our ability to fully compare several aspects of the ecology of Ciona spp. and are priority areas for future research. We anticipate that our clarification of common and unique aspects of each species’ ecology will help to provide context for future research in many aspects of the biology of Ciona spp.","PeriodicalId":55376,"journal":{"name":"Biological Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological Review of the Ciona Species Complex\",\"authors\":\"Emmerson R. Wilson, Kieran J. Murphy, R. Wyeth\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/719476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The set of four closely related solitary ascidians Ciona spp. were once considered a single cosmopolitan species, Ciona intestinalis, but are now recognized as genetically and morphologically distinct species. The possibility of ecological differences between the species was not widely considered in studies preceding the schism of Ciona spp. Consequently, there may be an over-generalization of the ecology of Ciona spp., with potential implications for the broad range of studies targeting these species, encompassing the evolution, development, genomics, and invasion biology of Ciona spp. We completed a comprehensive review of the ecology of Ciona spp. to establish the similarities and differences between the widely distributed Ciona robusta and C. intestinalis (and what little is known of the two other species, Ciona sp. C and Ciona sp. D). When necessary, we used study locations and the species’ geographic ranges to infer the species in each study in the review. As expected, ecological similarities are the norm between the two species, spanning both abiotic and biotic interactions. However, there are also important differences that have potential implications for other aspects of the biology of Ciona spp. For example, differences in temperature and salinity tolerances likely correspond with the disparities in the geographic distribution of the species. Asymmetries in topics studied in each species diminish our ability to fully compare several aspects of the ecology of Ciona spp. and are priority areas for future research. We anticipate that our clarification of common and unique aspects of each species’ ecology will help to provide context for future research in many aspects of the biology of Ciona spp.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/719476\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

四种亲缘关系密切的单生海鞘Ciona spp.曾经被认为是一个单一的世界性物种,即肠海鞘,但现在被认为是遗传和形态上不同的物种。在Ciona分裂之前的研究中,物种之间存在生态差异的可能性没有得到广泛考虑。因此,Ciona的生态学可能存在过度概括。这可能会对针对这些物种的广泛研究产生潜在影响,包括Ciona属的进化、发展、基因组学和入侵生物学。我们完成了对Ciona sp.生态学的全面审查,以确定广泛分布的Ciona robusta和C.intestinalis之间的相似性和差异性(以及对另外两个物种Ciona sp.C和Ciona sp.D知之甚少)。必要时,我们使用研究地点和物种的地理范围来推断综述中每项研究中的物种。正如预期的那样,生态相似性是两个物种之间的常态,涵盖了非生物和生物的相互作用。然而,也有一些重要的差异对Ciona spp.生物学的其他方面有潜在的影响。例如,温度和盐度耐受性的差异可能与物种地理分布的差异相对应。每个物种研究主题的不对称性削弱了我们充分比较Ciona spp.生态学几个方面的能力,也是未来研究的优先领域。我们预计,我们对每个物种生态学的共同和独特方面的澄清将有助于为未来在Ciona spp.生物学的许多方面的研究提供背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological Review of the Ciona Species Complex
The set of four closely related solitary ascidians Ciona spp. were once considered a single cosmopolitan species, Ciona intestinalis, but are now recognized as genetically and morphologically distinct species. The possibility of ecological differences between the species was not widely considered in studies preceding the schism of Ciona spp. Consequently, there may be an over-generalization of the ecology of Ciona spp., with potential implications for the broad range of studies targeting these species, encompassing the evolution, development, genomics, and invasion biology of Ciona spp. We completed a comprehensive review of the ecology of Ciona spp. to establish the similarities and differences between the widely distributed Ciona robusta and C. intestinalis (and what little is known of the two other species, Ciona sp. C and Ciona sp. D). When necessary, we used study locations and the species’ geographic ranges to infer the species in each study in the review. As expected, ecological similarities are the norm between the two species, spanning both abiotic and biotic interactions. However, there are also important differences that have potential implications for other aspects of the biology of Ciona spp. For example, differences in temperature and salinity tolerances likely correspond with the disparities in the geographic distribution of the species. Asymmetries in topics studied in each species diminish our ability to fully compare several aspects of the ecology of Ciona spp. and are priority areas for future research. We anticipate that our clarification of common and unique aspects of each species’ ecology will help to provide context for future research in many aspects of the biology of Ciona spp.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Bulletin
Biological Bulletin 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Biological Bulletin disseminates novel scientific results in broadly related fields of biology in keeping with more than 100 years of a tradition of excellence. The Bulletin publishes outstanding original research with an overarching goal of explaining how organisms develop, function, and evolve in their natural environments. To that end, the journal publishes papers in the fields of Neurobiology and Behavior, Physiology and Biomechanics, Ecology and Evolution, Development and Reproduction, Cell Biology, Symbiosis and Systematics. The Bulletin emphasizes basic research on marine model systems but includes articles of an interdisciplinary nature when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信