亚历克西斯·德·托克维尔:现代民主国家及其竞争对手

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Glyn Morgan
{"title":"亚历克西斯·德·托克维尔:现代民主国家及其竞争对手","authors":"Glyn Morgan","doi":"10.3138/TTR.39.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper draws on Tocqueville's Democracy in America to distinguish three different types of modern democracy—(i) the democratic nation-state, (ii) the post sovereign, multinational democracy, and (iii) the populist national democracy. The paper argues that all three have characteristic deficits—respectively, a security deficit, a democratic deficit, and a liberal deficit. The paper discusses the likely impact of Brexit and Trump on these forms of democracy in modern Europe. The paper concludes that while Trump—and more especially, \"Trumpism\"—poses a challenge to the European Union, Brexit presents an opportunity to demonstrate to its own citizens the benefits of this type of polity.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"11 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alexis De Tocqueville, The Modern Democratic Nation-State, and Its Competitors\",\"authors\":\"Glyn Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/TTR.39.1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This paper draws on Tocqueville's Democracy in America to distinguish three different types of modern democracy—(i) the democratic nation-state, (ii) the post sovereign, multinational democracy, and (iii) the populist national democracy. The paper argues that all three have characteristic deficits—respectively, a security deficit, a democratic deficit, and a liberal deficit. The paper discusses the likely impact of Brexit and Trump on these forms of democracy in modern Europe. The paper concludes that while Trump—and more especially, \\\"Trumpism\\\"—poses a challenge to the European Union, Brexit presents an opportunity to demonstrate to its own citizens the benefits of this type of polity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"11 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.39.1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.39.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文借鉴托克维尔的《美国的民主》来区分三种不同类型的现代民主——(i)民主的民族国家,(ii)后主权的跨国民主,以及(iii)民粹主义的民族民主。这篇论文认为,这三者都有各自的特征性赤字——分别是安全赤字、民主赤字和自由主义赤字。本文讨论了英国脱欧和特朗普对现代欧洲这些民主形式的可能影响。该论文的结论是,尽管特朗普——尤其是“特朗普主义”——对欧盟构成了挑战,但英国脱欧为其公民展示这种政治的好处提供了一个机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alexis De Tocqueville, The Modern Democratic Nation-State, and Its Competitors
Abstract:This paper draws on Tocqueville's Democracy in America to distinguish three different types of modern democracy—(i) the democratic nation-state, (ii) the post sovereign, multinational democracy, and (iii) the populist national democracy. The paper argues that all three have characteristic deficits—respectively, a security deficit, a democratic deficit, and a liberal deficit. The paper discusses the likely impact of Brexit and Trump on these forms of democracy in modern Europe. The paper concludes that while Trump—and more especially, "Trumpism"—poses a challenge to the European Union, Brexit presents an opportunity to demonstrate to its own citizens the benefits of this type of polity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tocqueville Review
Tocqueville Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信