雅典本土国王和他们的家庭:他们神话的共同模式

IF 0.2 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS

ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/are.2023.a899547

L. Edmunds

{"title":"雅典本土国王和他们的家庭:他们神话的共同模式","authors":"L. Edmunds","doi":"10.1353/are.2023.a899547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The myths of four Athenian autochthonous kings (Kekrops, Kranaus, Erichthonius, Erechtheus) share a story pattern. The royal line extends only to the third generation and not always so far. The gene of autochthony does not persist beyond the second generation. The \"speaking names\" of the kings' wives and children overdetermine this pattern. Lévi-Strauss' notion of the affirmation and denial of their autochthony by the same people applies to these myths and is played out in fifth- and fourth-century Athens, when \"autochthonous\" may mean either \"born from the earth\" or simply \"indigenous.\"","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"56 1","pages":"1 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Athenian Autochthonous Kings and their Families: The Shared Patterns of their Myths\",\"authors\":\"L. Edmunds\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/are.2023.a899547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The myths of four Athenian autochthonous kings (Kekrops, Kranaus, Erichthonius, Erechtheus) share a story pattern. The royal line extends only to the third generation and not always so far. The gene of autochthony does not persist beyond the second generation. The \\\"speaking names\\\" of the kings' wives and children overdetermine this pattern. Lévi-Strauss' notion of the affirmation and denial of their autochthony by the same people applies to these myths and is played out in fifth- and fourth-century Athens, when \\\"autochthonous\\\" may mean either \\\"born from the earth\\\" or simply \\\"indigenous.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":44750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2023.a899547\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2023.a899547","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要：四位雅典本土国王（凯克洛普、克拉诺、埃里希托尼乌斯、埃雷希修斯）的神话有着共同的故事模式。皇室血统只延续到第三代，并不总是延续到现在。本土基因不会持续到第二代以后。国王的妻子和孩子的“会说话的名字”过度决定了这种模式。莱维·斯特劳斯（Lévi Strauss）关于同一个人肯定和否认他们的本土性的概念适用于这些神话，并在五世纪和四世纪的雅典上演，当时“本土”可能意味着“从地球上出生”或简单地“土著”

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Athenian Autochthonous Kings and their Families: The Shared Patterns of their Myths

Abstract:The myths of four Athenian autochthonous kings (Kekrops, Kranaus, Erichthonius, Erechtheus) share a story pattern. The royal line extends only to the third generation and not always so far. The gene of autochthony does not persist beyond the second generation. The "speaking names" of the kings' wives and children overdetermine this pattern. Lévi-Strauss' notion of the affirmation and denial of their autochthony by the same people applies to these myths and is played out in fifth- and fourth-century Athens, when "autochthonous" may mean either "born from the earth" or simply "indigenous."

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ARETHUSA CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.