对“森林生态系统破坏非法起诉”的科学批评

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal Pub Date : 2022-08-26 DOI:10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.745

R. G. Garrido

{"title":"对“森林生态系统破坏非法起诉”的科学批评","authors":"R. G. Garrido","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed in the article “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction,” aiming to expand its discussion, especially from a comparison between the Polish and the Brazilian reality. For this purpose, exploratory, documentary, and bibliographic research was carried out, allowing the recognition that the similarities in the prosecution of environmental crimes bring both countries closer together than they are further apart despite clear distinctions of environmental reality and criminal procedural diversity, especially concerning evidence.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific criticism of “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction\",\"authors\":\"R. G. Garrido\",\"doi\":\"10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed in the article “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction,” aiming to expand its discussion, especially from a comparison between the Polish and the Brazilian reality. For this purpose, exploratory, documentary, and bibliographic research was carried out, allowing the recognition that the similarities in the prosecution of environmental crimes bring both countries closer together than they are further apart despite clear distinctions of environmental reality and criminal procedural diversity, especially concerning evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这一科学批评是基于文章“关于森林生态系统破坏的非法起诉”中提出的内容，旨在扩大讨论范围，特别是通过对波兰和巴西现实的比较。为此目的，进行了探索性研究、文献研究和书目研究，认识到环境犯罪起诉方面的相似之处使两国联系更紧密，而不是彼此疏远，尽管环境现实和刑事诉讼程序的多样性，特别是在证据方面存在明显差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Scientific criticism of “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction

This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed in the article “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction,” aiming to expand its discussion, especially from a comparison between the Polish and the Brazilian reality. For this purpose, exploratory, documentary, and bibliographic research was carried out, allowing the recognition that the similarities in the prosecution of environmental crimes bring both countries closer together than they are further apart despite clear distinctions of environmental reality and criminal procedural diversity, especially concerning evidence.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal LAW-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

66.70%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks