质疑实验经济学中贿赂的结构有效性

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Carlos Maximiliano Senci
{"title":"质疑实验经济学中贿赂的结构有效性","authors":"Carlos Maximiliano Senci","doi":"10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bribery construct employed by experimental studies of corruption faces three interrelated challenges. First, the notion of trust used in the bribery construct reduces it to a mere calculation of risk. Second, and as a consequence of the above, the appropriate context of interaction is undetermined. Finally, the experiments show an insufficient clarification of the normative framework. In short, researchers on corruption should be mindful of the challenges of the construct they employ in the lab, and they should tackle the aforementioned issues in order not to compromise the validity of their results.","PeriodicalId":40583,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Filosofia de la Ciencia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging the construct validity of bribery in experimental economics\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Maximiliano Senci\",\"doi\":\"10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The bribery construct employed by experimental studies of corruption faces three interrelated challenges. First, the notion of trust used in the bribery construct reduces it to a mere calculation of risk. Second, and as a consequence of the above, the appropriate context of interaction is undetermined. Finally, the experiments show an insufficient clarification of the normative framework. In short, researchers on corruption should be mindful of the challenges of the construct they employ in the lab, and they should tackle the aforementioned issues in order not to compromise the validity of their results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Filosofia de la Ciencia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Filosofia de la Ciencia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Filosofia de la Ciencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腐败实验研究所采用的贿赂结构面临三个相互关联的挑战。首先,贿赂结构中使用的信任概念将其简化为对风险的计算。第二,由于上述情况,互动的适当背景尚未确定。最后,实验表明,对规范框架的澄清不够充分。简言之,腐败问题研究人员应该注意他们在实验室中使用的结构所带来的挑战,他们应该解决上述问题,以免影响他们结果的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenging the construct validity of bribery in experimental economics
The bribery construct employed by experimental studies of corruption faces three interrelated challenges. First, the notion of trust used in the bribery construct reduces it to a mere calculation of risk. Second, and as a consequence of the above, the appropriate context of interaction is undetermined. Finally, the experiments show an insufficient clarification of the normative framework. In short, researchers on corruption should be mindful of the challenges of the construct they employ in the lab, and they should tackle the aforementioned issues in order not to compromise the validity of their results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Filosofia de la Ciencia
Revista Colombiana de Filosofia de la Ciencia HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信