非光滑图像分割中最小化方法的比较

IF 0.3 Q4 MATHEMATICS
L. Antonelli, V. De Simone
{"title":"非光滑图像分割中最小化方法的比较","authors":"L. Antonelli, V. De Simone","doi":"10.1515/caim-2018-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Segmentation is a typical task in image processing having as main goal the partitioning of the image into multiple segments in order to simplify its interpretation and analysis. One of the more popular segmentation model, formulated by Chan-Vese, is the piecewise constant Mumford-Shah model restricted to the case of two-phase segmentation. We consider a convex relaxation formulation of the segmentation model, that can be regarded as a nonsmooth optimization problem, because the presence of the l1-term. Two basic approaches in optimization can be distinguished to deal with its non differentiability: the smoothing methods and the nonsmoothing methods. In this work, a numerical comparison of some first order methods belongs of both approaches are presented. The relationships among the different methods are shown, and accuracy and efficiency tests are also performed on several images.","PeriodicalId":37903,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics","volume":"9 1","pages":"68 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of minimization methods for nonsmooth image segmentation\",\"authors\":\"L. Antonelli, V. De Simone\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/caim-2018-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Segmentation is a typical task in image processing having as main goal the partitioning of the image into multiple segments in order to simplify its interpretation and analysis. One of the more popular segmentation model, formulated by Chan-Vese, is the piecewise constant Mumford-Shah model restricted to the case of two-phase segmentation. We consider a convex relaxation formulation of the segmentation model, that can be regarded as a nonsmooth optimization problem, because the presence of the l1-term. Two basic approaches in optimization can be distinguished to deal with its non differentiability: the smoothing methods and the nonsmoothing methods. In this work, a numerical comparison of some first order methods belongs of both approaches are presented. The relationships among the different methods are shown, and accuracy and efficiency tests are also performed on several images.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"68 - 86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/caim-2018-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/caim-2018-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

摘要分割是图像处理中的一项典型任务,其主要目标是将图像分割为多个片段,以简化其解释和分析。Chan-Vese提出的一种更流行的分割模型是分段常数Mumford-Shah模型,该模型仅限于两阶段分割的情况。我们考虑分割模型的凸松弛公式,它可以被视为一个非光滑优化问题,因为l1项的存在。优化中的两种基本方法可以用来处理其不可微性:光滑方法和非光滑方法。在这项工作中,对属于这两种方法的一些一阶方法进行了数值比较。显示了不同方法之间的关系,并对几个图像进行了准确性和效率测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of minimization methods for nonsmooth image segmentation
Abstract Segmentation is a typical task in image processing having as main goal the partitioning of the image into multiple segments in order to simplify its interpretation and analysis. One of the more popular segmentation model, formulated by Chan-Vese, is the piecewise constant Mumford-Shah model restricted to the case of two-phase segmentation. We consider a convex relaxation formulation of the segmentation model, that can be regarded as a nonsmooth optimization problem, because the presence of the l1-term. Two basic approaches in optimization can be distinguished to deal with its non differentiability: the smoothing methods and the nonsmoothing methods. In this work, a numerical comparison of some first order methods belongs of both approaches are presented. The relationships among the different methods are shown, and accuracy and efficiency tests are also performed on several images.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications in Applied and Industrial Mathematics (CAIM) is one of the official journals of the Italian Society for Applied and Industrial Mathematics (SIMAI). Providing immediate open access to original, unpublished high quality contributions, CAIM is devoted to timely report on ongoing original research work, new interdisciplinary subjects, and new developments. The journal focuses on the applications of mathematics to the solution of problems in industry, technology, environment, cultural heritage, and natural sciences, with a special emphasis on new and interesting mathematical ideas relevant to these fields of application . Encouraging novel cross-disciplinary approaches to mathematical research, CAIM aims to provide an ideal platform for scientists who cooperate in different fields including pure and applied mathematics, computer science, engineering, physics, chemistry, biology, medicine and to link scientist with professionals active in industry, research centres, academia or in the public sector. Coverage includes research articles describing new analytical or numerical methods, descriptions of modelling approaches, simulations for more accurate predictions or experimental observations of complex phenomena, verification/validation of numerical and experimental methods; invited or submitted reviews and perspectives concerning mathematical techniques in relation to applications, and and fields in which new problems have arisen for which mathematical models and techniques are not yet available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信