阅读自己与他人:罗斯的《为什么写作?》以及萨特的《为什么写作?》

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Philip Roth Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1353/prs.2023.0003

James Duban

{"title":"阅读自己与他人:罗斯的《为什么写作?》以及萨特的《为什么写作?》","authors":"James Duban","doi":"10.1353/prs.2023.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:What might readers infer from the identical titles and related concerns of Sartre's \"Pourquoi écrire?\" (\"Why Write?\") and Roth's Why Write?, his collected nonfiction, 1960-2013? Some of the concerns of that volume appear to link the more pervasive synthesis of nothingness and possibility in Sartre's Being and Nothingness (1943) to Arthur Koestler's advocacy, in Insight and Outlook (1949), of \"bisociative\" cognition. At stake, for Roth, when reading himself and others, are incisive rejoinders to \"insensate readers\" who, ignoring the difference between personal identity and imaginative excursion, surrender personal responsibility while denigrating artistic prowess.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Himself and Others: Roth's Why Write? and Sartre's \\\"Why Write?\\\"\",\"authors\":\"James Duban\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/prs.2023.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:What might readers infer from the identical titles and related concerns of Sartre's \\\"Pourquoi écrire?\\\" (\\\"Why Write?\\\") and Roth's Why Write?, his collected nonfiction, 1960-2013? Some of the concerns of that volume appear to link the more pervasive synthesis of nothingness and possibility in Sartre's Being and Nothingness (1943) to Arthur Koestler's advocacy, in Insight and Outlook (1949), of \\\"bisociative\\\" cognition. At stake, for Roth, when reading himself and others, are incisive rejoinders to \\\"insensate readers\\\" who, ignoring the difference between personal identity and imaginative excursion, surrender personal responsibility while denigrating artistic prowess.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2023.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2023.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:读者可以从萨特的《Pourquoi samcrire》的相同标题和相关关注点中推断出什么?(《为什么写作?》)和罗斯的《为什么写作?》他的非虚构类文集(1960-2013)?该卷的一些关注似乎将萨特的《存在与虚无》(1943)中更普遍的虚无和可能性的综合与阿瑟·凯斯特勒在《洞察与展望》(1949)中倡导的“分离”认知联系起来。对于罗斯来说，在阅读自己和他人的作品时，他对“麻木的读者”进行了尖锐的反驳，这些读者忽视了个人身份和想象漫游之间的区别，放弃了个人责任，同时贬低了艺术才能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reading Himself and Others: Roth's Why Write? and Sartre's "Why Write?"

Abstract:What might readers infer from the identical titles and related concerns of Sartre's "Pourquoi écrire?" ("Why Write?") and Roth's Why Write?, his collected nonfiction, 1960-2013? Some of the concerns of that volume appear to link the more pervasive synthesis of nothingness and possibility in Sartre's Being and Nothingness (1943) to Arthur Koestler's advocacy, in Insight and Outlook (1949), of "bisociative" cognition. At stake, for Roth, when reading himself and others, are incisive rejoinders to "insensate readers" who, ignoring the difference between personal identity and imaginative excursion, surrender personal responsibility while denigrating artistic prowess.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量