引文:学术文本中的引文爱欲

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Chase Gregory
{"title":"引文:学术文本中的引文爱欲","authors":"Chase Gregory","doi":"10.1353/dia.2020.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Dissatisfied by traditional metaphors of generational inheritance, this piece explores alternative ways of relating to a citational archive in order to open up the possibility for an erotics of citation. I performatively read two texts—Lee Edelman's \"Seeing Things: Representation, the Scene of Surveillance, and the Spectacle of Gay Male Sex\" (1991) and D.A. Miller's \"Call for Papers: In MemoriumBarbara Johnson\" (2011)—and chronicle my own experience as a reader in order to provide two examples of the ways citational association can productively spin out of control.","PeriodicalId":46840,"journal":{"name":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Ex)Citation: Citational Eros in Academic Texts\",\"authors\":\"Chase Gregory\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/dia.2020.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Dissatisfied by traditional metaphors of generational inheritance, this piece explores alternative ways of relating to a citational archive in order to open up the possibility for an erotics of citation. I performatively read two texts—Lee Edelman's \\\"Seeing Things: Representation, the Scene of Surveillance, and the Spectacle of Gay Male Sex\\\" (1991) and D.A. Miller's \\\"Call for Papers: In MemoriumBarbara Johnson\\\" (2011)—and chronicle my own experience as a reader in order to provide two examples of the ways citational association can productively spin out of control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2020.0019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2020.0019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本文对代际传承的传统隐喻感到不满,探索了与引文档案相关的其他方式,以开辟引文情色的可能性。我以表演的方式阅读了两篇文章——李·埃德尔曼的《看见事物:表象、监视的场景和男同性恋的景象》(1991)和D.A.米勒的《征文:纪念芭芭拉·约翰逊》(2011)——并记录了我自己作为读者的经历,以便提供两个例子,说明引用联想可能会有效地脱离控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
(Ex)Citation: Citational Eros in Academic Texts
Abstract:Dissatisfied by traditional metaphors of generational inheritance, this piece explores alternative ways of relating to a citational archive in order to open up the possibility for an erotics of citation. I performatively read two texts—Lee Edelman's "Seeing Things: Representation, the Scene of Surveillance, and the Spectacle of Gay Male Sex" (1991) and D.A. Miller's "Call for Papers: In MemoriumBarbara Johnson" (2011)—and chronicle my own experience as a reader in order to provide two examples of the ways citational association can productively spin out of control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over thirty years, diacritics has been an exceptional and influential forum for scholars writing on the problems of literary criticism. Each issue features articles in which contributors compare and analyze books on particular theoretical works and develop their own positions on the theses, methods, and theoretical implications of those works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信