家庭破裂、压力和下一代的心理健康:评论

IF 10.5 1区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

American Economic Review Pub Date : 2018-03-30 DOI:10.1257/AER.20161124

Brett Matsumoto

{"title":"家庭破裂、压力和下一代的心理健康:评论","authors":"Brett Matsumoto","doi":"10.1257/AER.20161124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The empirical methodology used by Persson and Rossin-Slater (2018) to estimate the causal effect of in utero exposure to stress contains a potentially significant flaw. They define the control group in a way that may bias their causal estimates and can lead to the finding of a significant relationship when there is none. In this note, I describe the source of the bias and suggest an alternative specification of the control group.","PeriodicalId":48472,"journal":{"name":"American Economic Review","volume":"108 1","pages":"1253-1255"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1257/AER.20161124","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Ruptures, Stress, and the Mental Health of the Next Generation: Comment\",\"authors\":\"Brett Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1257/AER.20161124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The empirical methodology used by Persson and Rossin-Slater (2018) to estimate the causal effect of in utero exposure to stress contains a potentially significant flaw. They define the control group in a way that may bias their causal estimates and can lead to the finding of a significant relationship when there is none. In this note, I describe the source of the bias and suggest an alternative specification of the control group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"1253-1255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1257/AER.20161124\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.20161124\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.20161124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

Persson和Rossin-Slater（2018）用于估计子宫内暴露于压力的因果影响的经验方法包含一个潜在的重大缺陷。他们定义对照组的方式可能会使他们的因果估计产生偏差，并在没有因果关系的情况下导致发现显著关系。在本说明中，我描述了偏差的来源，并提出了对照组的替代规范。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Family Ruptures, Stress, and the Mental Health of the Next Generation: Comment

The empirical methodology used by Persson and Rossin-Slater (2018) to estimate the causal effect of in utero exposure to stress contains a potentially significant flaw. They define the control group in a way that may bias their causal estimates and can lead to the finding of a significant relationship when there is none. In this note, I describe the source of the bias and suggest an alternative specification of the control group.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American Economic Review ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

18.60

自引率

2.80%

发文量

122

期刊介绍： The American Economic Review (AER) stands as a prestigious general-interest economics journal. Founded in 1911, it holds the distinction of being one of the nation's oldest and most esteemed scholarly journals in economics. With a commitment to academic excellence, the AER releases 12 issues annually, featuring articles that span a wide spectrum of economic topics.