扫罗的儿子们是替罪羊吗?

IF 0.3 3区哲学 0 RELIGION

Biblical Interpretation-A Journal of Contemporary Approaches Pub Date : 2022-04-18 DOI:10.1163/15685152-20221541

Nathan J. Chambers

{"title":"扫罗的儿子们是替罪羊吗?","authors":"Nathan J. Chambers","doi":"10.1163/15685152-20221541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nA number of scholars have praised the work of René Girard as opening a way forward for biblical interpretation. This essay seeks to test the utility of Girard’s theories by applying them to a close reading of 2 Samuel 21:1–14. It concludes that Girard’s work draws attention to certain neglected themes but is unable to account for the narrative of 2 Samuel 21 in its final form.","PeriodicalId":43103,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Interpretation-A Journal of Contemporary Approaches","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Saul’s Sons Scapegoats?\",\"authors\":\"Nathan J. Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685152-20221541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nA number of scholars have praised the work of René Girard as opening a way forward for biblical interpretation. This essay seeks to test the utility of Girard’s theories by applying them to a close reading of 2 Samuel 21:1–14. It concludes that Girard’s work draws attention to certain neglected themes but is unable to account for the narrative of 2 Samuel 21 in its final form.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biblical Interpretation-A Journal of Contemporary Approaches\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biblical Interpretation-A Journal of Contemporary Approaches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685152-20221541\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Interpretation-A Journal of Contemporary Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685152-20221541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

许多学者称赞勒内·吉拉德的工作为圣经解释开辟了一条前进的道路。本文试图通过将吉拉德的理论应用于《撒母耳记下》21:1-14的细读来检验其效用。它得出的结论是，吉拉德的作品引起了人们对某些被忽视的主题的关注，但无法解释《撒母耳记下21》的最终形式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Are Saul’s Sons Scapegoats?

A number of scholars have praised the work of René Girard as opening a way forward for biblical interpretation. This essay seeks to test the utility of Girard’s theories by applying them to a close reading of 2 Samuel 21:1–14. It concludes that Girard’s work draws attention to certain neglected themes but is unable to account for the narrative of 2 Samuel 21 in its final form.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Biblical Interpretation-A Journal of Contemporary Approaches RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This innovative and highly acclaimed journal publishes articles on various aspects of critical biblical scholarship in a complex global context. The journal provides a medium for the development and exercise of a whole range of current interpretive trajectories, as well as deliberation and appraisal of methodological foci and resources. Alongside individual essays on various subjects submitted by authors, the journal welcomes proposals for special issues that focus on particular emergent themes and analytical trends. Over the past two decades, Biblical Interpretation has provided a professional forum for pushing the disciplinary boundaries of biblical studies: not only in terms of what biblical texts mean, but also what questions to ask of biblical texts, as well as what resources to use in reading biblical literature. The journal has thus the distinction of serving as a site for theoretical reflection and methodological experimentation.